Atheism people (non-believers) should be invited by the believers for a peaceful dialogue

[paarsurrey]

We, believers, should convince Atheism people with our reasonable and brilliant signs and arguments on one to one basis in and outside the Academia, over a cup of tea and or coffee, like thus:

Hello! Hello! Hello!

Peace be on you and your family.
Over a cup of hot coffee or tea in the Tim Hortons
Without the burden of “Burden of proof”
Let us compare our notes on:
“Does God exist or does not exist?”
Don’t worry; I will pay the bill of Tim Hortons.
Cordially invited to one to one discussion
Open to everybody, the Theists (the believers in God) of all denominations and the Atheists (the non-believers) of all hues and colors.
It will be a peaceful dialogue and without derision or ridicule.
Just call me, please:
I am, Skeptic of the Skeptic, a believer in God very naturally.​

I am confident we can convince them with peaceful dialogue .
Regards

 

[LuisDantas]

Convince us of the convenience or need to believe in God, you mean?

I am somewhat sad that you would even feel such a need, you know.

 

[Corthos]

Some of the people who's opinions I respect most in this world are atheists. I think atheists and agnostics tend to be more intellectually honest, and their questions and opinions certainly help me to stay intellectually honest with myself. =)

 

[lewisnotmiller]

Meh, I'm all for cordial dialogue, so I'd have no issue with you trying, so long as you were listening as well as talking.
I wish more people in the world promoted peaceful discussion.

 

[Deathbydefault]

We, believers, should convince Atheism people with our reasonable and brilliant signs and arguments on one to one basis in and outside the Academia, over a cup of tea and or coffee, like thus:

Atheists*
It's only brilliant to those such as yourself.
People like me describe it, at best, as "meh".

Hello! Hello! Hello!

Peace be on you and your family.
Over a cup of hot coffee or tea in the Tim Hortons
Without the burden of “Burden of proof”
Let us compare our notes on:
“Does God exist or does not exist?”
Don’t worry; I will pay the bill of Tim Hortons.
Cordially invited to one to one discussion
Open to everybody, the Theists (the believers in God) of all denominations and the Atheists (the non-believers) of all hues and colors.
It will be a peaceful dialogue and without derision or ridicule.
Just call me, please:
I am, Skeptic of the Skeptic, a believer in God very naturally.

Peaceful dialogue is fine as long as nobody acts like they have the moral high ground.

I am confident we can convince them with peaceful dialogue .
Regards

Convince us of what?
Peaceful dialogue is conversation on points of views, not debate.

 

[Riverwolf]

I see no need to convince non-believers of anything, nor do I particularly want to. People can believe whatever they want, and there's no inherent detriment to either belief or non-belief.

 

[icehorse]

Ok, sign me up, convince me!

 

[Skwim]

We, believers, should convince Atheism people with our reasonable and brilliant signs and arguments on one to one basis in and outside the Academia, over a cup of tea and or coffee, like thus:

Hello! Hello! Hello!

Peace be on you and your family.
Over a cup of hot coffee or tea in the Tim Hortons
Without the burden of “Burden of proof”
Let us compare our notes on:
“Does God exist or does not exist?”
Don’t worry; I will pay the bill of Tim Hortons.
Cordially invited to one to one discussion
Open to everybody, the Theists (the believers in God) of all denominations and the Atheists (the non-believers) of all hues and colors.
It will be a peaceful dialogue and without derision or ridicule.
Just call me, please:
I am, Skeptic of the Skeptic, a believer in God very naturally.​

I am confident we can convince them with peaceful dialogue .
Regards

It's already being tried,

and from what I've heard, not a profitable enterprise at all.

Might want to round up the choir and work on their commitment. I think I saw them at Hooters.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

Ok, sign me up, convince me!

You just want a free coffee..

 

[Noa]

I'll converse with someone of virtually any worldview as long as neither of us is trying to alter the worldview of the other.

 

[George-ananda]

Isn't RF like Tim Horton's in that regard? Anyway, paradigm shifting moments are not many.

 

[Laika]

you can count me in.

 

[Riverwolf]

Ok, sign me up, convince me!

you can count me in.

We have mead.

 

[Kirran]

I don't feel either atheist or theist describes me. Do I get to come?

 

[LuisDantas]

I don't feel either atheist or theist describes me. Do I get to come?

Good question. The divide is actually nearly meaningless, or at least greatly exagerated in significance.

 

[DawudTalut]

We, believers, should convince Atheism people with our reasonable and brilliant signs and arguments on one to one basis in and outside the Academia, over a cup of tea and or coffee, like thus:

Hello! Hello! Hello!

Peace be on you and your family.
Over a cup of hot coffee or tea in the Tim Hortons
Without the burden of “Burden of proof”
Let us compare our notes on:
“Does God exist or does not exist?”
Don’t worry; I will pay the bill of Tim Hortons.
Cordially invited to one to one discussion
Open to everybody, the Theists (the believers in God) of all denominations and the Atheists (the non-believers) of all hues and colors.
It will be a peaceful dialogue and without derision or ridicule.
Just call me, please:
I am, Skeptic of the Skeptic, a believer in God very naturally.​

I am confident we can convince them with peaceful dialogue .
Regards

Is it international ?

 

[Kirran]

Good question. The divide is actually nearly meaningless, or at least greatly exagerated in significance.

Quite so. And rather a phenomenon of Abrahamic-centric thinking, too.

 

[LuisDantas]

Quite so. And rather a phenomenon of Abrahamic-centric thinking, too.

Indeed. Abrahamists often fail to notice how utterly unimportant it is that (say) Shivaists and Vishnaivas disagree on the relative importance of their Gods, or even on how "true" their existences are.

The fact of the matter is that there is no need to agree on such a strictly personal matter. God does not need my approval.

 

[Kirran]

Indeed. Abrahamists often fail to notice how utterly unimportant it is that (say) Shivaists and Vishnaivas disagree on the relative importance of their Gods, or even on how "true" their existences are.

The fact of the matter is that there is no need to agree on such a strictly personal matter. God does not need my approval.

Interesting thoughts! Certainly, God does not. What's more, I think the ideas of God being both personal and separate from reality are both widely assumed and rather cheapening.

 

[LuisDantas]

Can you give an example? I'm not sure I understand.