Booko said:
OK, if we're doing dueling quotes, than I'm wondering how this one squares:
Mat. 24:22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. (cf. Mark 13:20)
If it's undeniable that the Bible teaches that this earth and heaven are going to be destroyed with intense fire, then were are the rest of the "flesh" going to be saved? Or do we have to wait until Mars is colonized before the end times will arrive? And no, that was not a smart remark...it's a serious question.
Ushta booko
The point is that literalist Christians , believe, rightly in my opinion and I have searched the linguistics of the New Testament and know Koine Greek pretty good, that the Bible teaches that the earth, world, humanity, will end in an Armageddon like scenario.
You make a point that is very good, but the problem is that a literalist will not accept an obvious contradiction but will 'harmonize' the passages somehow.
I, not being Christian, (although I once was) can see the contradiction you see, and can just chalk it up to the contradictory nature of Biblical theology like the other many contradictions that the 'true believers; can't and don't want to see.
I notice that you are Bahai, like my friend Scott, so I will venture that, like him, you assign this contradicxtion to an allegory. From a hermeneutical point of view, allegories to be accepatable, as possible interpretation of passages, will have to have independent support, that is there has to be other similar uses of the central points of a story as allegorical elsewhere, preferably in literature that is non-biblical
Take the idea of fire being a symbol, it certainly is in many instances but it is not in others, so when specifically Peter says that the earth will be destroyed by fire and chimes in that the very elements will be destroyed, it can hardly be an allegory since there is no other place in the Bible or outside the Bible within the Jewsih culture ( it is important that we relate the Biblical allegories to at least turnof the 1st Century Jewish culture) where fire is seen burning the elements ( Earth, Fire, Air and Water)
This is a literal fire that Peter is talking about Therefore as your post points out , even if you do not agree, this is a contradiction. One of many, I am afraid.
Ushta te
Ashai