Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's a good question, Robtex. I was thinking of the ancient philosophers when I posed the question, rather than thinking of the modern day meanings of "stoic" and "hedonist". I think it's easier to see them as two extremes on a continum if you think of the ancients.robtex said:I thought the opposite of stoic would be emotional and the opposite of hedonistic would be one who shys away from pleasure ? I am not getting the question.
To be stoic is to be indifferent to passion and emotion (including pleasure). To be hedonistic is to pursue pleasure as the highest good in life.RearingArabian said:Am I the only one who does not understand head or tail of the question?!
Someone please explain. I've only been 14 for less than 1 month.
Stoic [stəʊɪk]Anoun1 StoicRearingArabian said:Am I the only one who does not understand head or tail of the question?!
Someone please explain. I've only been 14 for less than 1 month.
Im not suprised, as your religious choice follows, stoics in my opinion originally started the orthodoxy... respectful considered.No*s said:I definately fall on the Stoic side. Heck, I accept most of the philisophical principles expressed in Stoicism. I shall have to reaquaint myself with my old friend Seneca again tonight .
Reverend Jeremiah said:Im not suprised, as your religious choice follows, stoics in my opinion originally started the orthodoxy... respectful considered.
Reverend Jeremiah said:besides...If every body acted the same, the world would be a boring place. A couple of stoics, a couple of hedonists.
It seems that many of the old testament heroes/antiheroes are also that way scout, in my humble opinion.jewscout said:I'm somewhere in between the 2...