1. Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Are meat and bhaang disallowed in Dharmic religion?

Discussion in 'Dharmic Religions DIR' started by ronki23, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:44 PM.

  1. ronki23

    ronki23 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2013
    Messages:
    691
    Ratings:
    +15
    Why do some Hindus sacrifice animals if the Vedas say you should be vegetarian? It is a sin to give animals as sacrifice. I even read Saraswati is given calf and Nepalis kill bison and buffalo.

    Only 25% of India is vegetarian when over 80% is Hindu. That obviously means not all Hindus are vegetarian. The Chinese, Far East and South East Asians all eat every kind of meat (even dogs and insects but not cats) even though Buddhism promotes ahimsa.

    According to Wikipedia, Sikhs serve Maha Prasad during Holla Mohalla which is normally goat meat. It also said Guru Hargobind and Guru Gobind Singh were hunters and they themselves ate meat. Where does it say Sikhs should be vegetarian and if vegetarian is not a necessity, why so many vegetarian Sikhs?

    Why do Nihang Sikhs drink bhaang if drugs are disallowed?
     
  2. SomeRandom

    SomeRandom Still learning to be wise

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2014
    Messages:
    2,909
    Ratings:
    +2,013
    Umm, I think that was prohibited by later Puranas actually. I have a vague feeling that it was a thing in Vedic times, at least among certain groups. But the timeline for me is a bit fuzzy so.
    Animal sacrifice is a very ancient thing. Though I do not personally condone it. It seems to be strongly associated with Kali "cults" which are pretty freaking old. So I'd be very surprised if animal sacrifice was a legitimately new addition. Relatively speaking, of course.
    Kali also seems to take offerings of alcohol! At least according to the "left handers" so to speak. I don't know how "Vedic" Tantra paths are though.

    Same reason there are Catholics and Christians I suppose. Differing interpretations often branch off into various places.
    Bhang is often used for meditation purposes among certain (often fringe) sects of various Dharmic adherents. I know there are some Saivas (not all or even a large amount) who partake in such a practice. Though I think it's usually through smoking.
    I've also heard stories about some crazy shenanigans of various Buddhist Monks.

    Indeed I've had to imbibe Kava a fair few times at certain Temple events. Which is nothing more than tribal anesthetic or "jungle juice." Honestly Bhang sounds much more appealing at least.
     
    #2 SomeRandom, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:39 PM
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2017 at 10:54 PM
  3. Aupmanyav

    Aupmanyav Be your own guru

    Joined:
    May 5, 2007
    Messages:
    14,896
    Ratings:
    +5,008
    Religion:
    I am an advaitist Hindu and a strong atheist.
    Vedas do not make it compulsory for all to be vegetarian. Ancient Aryans were non-vegetarians. If the flesh of the sacrifice is eaten later, then it is no different from butchering animal for food. Yes, some Hindus do make animal sacrifices to their deities. They are welcome to continue the practice till the time they may want a change. I will not vouch for your statistics, but yes, IMHO more than half the Hindus are non-vegetarians.

    I am not a Sikh, so my comments should be taken as from someone who has some knowledge of Sikhism but not whole. I do not think any Sikh gurus may ever have participated in a hunt for pleasure, but yes, meat-eating is not prohibited in Sikhism. If a Sikh is vegetarian, that is his/her choice; and that is commendable. I think 'Amritdharis' are vegetarian.

    Nihangs and Hindu Sadhus traditionally use intoxicants like bhang, ganja, charas; though liquor is prohibited. Some think that it helps them in their 'sadhana', though I will differ on this point.
     
    #3 Aupmanyav, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:44 AM
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2017 at 6:06 AM
  4. Vinayaka

    Vinayaka devotee
    Premium Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2011
    Messages:
    17,815
    Ratings:
    +4,748
    In the dharmic paradigm, not much is compulsory or dictated. Within individual sects, or groups, perhaps it is a requirement for membership. The few Sikhs I know are a mix. Some are vegetarian for non-religious reasons like for their health.

    As fot the last question, both 'bhaang' and 'drugs' have differing meanings.
     
  5. ronki23

    ronki23 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2013
    Messages:
    691
    Ratings:
    +15

    I thought the Vedas didn't prohibit meat for personal consumption eating but instead promoted vegetarianism? I thought animal sacrifice was a complete no-no though.

    If the scriptures say you shouldn't sacrifice animals or eat Bovine, why are so many buffalo and bison killed in Nepal and why are animals sacrificed in certain states of India? These people are going against the scripture.

    The same applies for Sikhs; they serve maha-prasad during Holla when Sikhs believe everyone should be entitled to langar so why make this distinction? At the same time, why are there so many vegetarian Sikhs and bhaang drinkers when the Guru Granth Sahib says no to drugs and alcohol? If you say vegetarianism is a choice, then why so many vegetarian Sikhs compared to vegetarian Christians/Jews/Muslims??

    As for Buddhism, Koreans eat dogs, South East Asians eat insects, and Chinese people " eat everything with four legs except a table, anything that flies except a plane and anything that swims except a boat". These are supposed to be Buddhist people
     
  6. SomeRandom

    SomeRandom Still learning to be wise

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2014
    Messages:
    2,909
    Ratings:
    +2,013
    Because not every Hindu has the same interpretation of scripture or even has their own?
     
Loading...