Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The faiths that disagree must be delusional.Scientifically, humans are considered animals, but many religions and faiths would disagree. What's your opinion?
Scientifically, humans are considered animals, but many religions and faiths would disagree. What's your opinion?
Of course. Having intellect and the ability for introspection dosent negate anything.Scientifically, humans are considered animals, but many religions and faiths would disagree. What's your opinion?
After being here at RF for a fair number of years, ya, they are animals here.Scientifically, humans are considered animals, but many religions and faiths would disagree. What's your opinion?
Yes humans are animals. Religions tend to make humans out to be some sort of higher form which can be true to a certain extent while still being animals. Do humans have some special soul that animals and even angels do not, I doubt it. The way I figure if there is some sort of spirit that it’s imbued in all life forms. Sure humans are special in many ways but there are other mammals, mainly great apes which show the same if not more advanced cognitive abilities including self awareness.Scientifically, humans are considered animals, but many religions and faiths would disagree. What's your opinion?
Religions tend to make humans out to be some sort of higher form which can be true to a certain extent while still being animals.
Most religions are freudian which is normal right handed world apparently.Scientifically, humans are considered animals, but many religions and faiths would disagree. What's your opinion?
Religion trends towards freudian. It's like freud loves the bible it's dysfunctional and normal. Believe not believe same dysfunction.Isn't this primarily found as a teaching of the Bible, though, and not a tendency of religions more broadly? I mostly just see this in the Abrahamic religions, not elsewhere.
They are "normals" it's freud dressed up in religious drag.The faiths that disagree must be delusional.
Religion trends towards freudian. It's like freud loves the bible it's dysfunctional and normal. Believe not believe same dysfunction.
It has little to do with science, nothing to do with religion and there’s no opinion about it; human beings clearly meet all standard definitions of the word animal. People are perfectly entitled to suggest human are somehow special or elevated but saying we’re not animals is just linguistically wrong.Scientifically, humans are considered animals, but many religions and faiths would disagree. What's your opinion?
Your probably right. Although I often hear the term higher consciousness as something atainable by humans but some may argue other animals are already there.Isn't this primarily found as a teaching of the Bible, though, and not a tendency of religions more broadly? I mostly just see this in the Abrahamic religions, not elsewhere.