Just one thing fire dragon. Whether we agree or not, I respect your views and I’m trying to learn from you as well, so I value what you share. It’s just friendly discussion, nothing confrontational. You have your own beliefs and you should stick with them.
Having looked into the major religions though, there is a strong case, I believe, that they all await a Promised One.
Buddhists - Maitreya, AmitAbha (Pure Land)
Hinduism (some sects not all) - Kalki Avatar
Zoroastrian Faith - Shah Bahram
Judaism - Lord of Hosts, King of Glory
Christianity - second coming
Islam - 12th Imam
I dont know much about the Zoroastrian scripture, and my knowledge in Hindu scripture is very limited. Judaism is just too vast for me to claim much. Well, in that case even Buddhism is too vast. On that route, all religions you have pointed out are way too vast to claim some kind of standard.
Thats why, very specific information and references are needed.
Nevertheless, I do respect your manner of discourse. So lets have a Dheega Nikaya. A long discourse.
You see LOH, you have made the statement that 80,000 as a life time was a long time ago and their perception of years was different. But you see, it also says that the life time has come down to 100 years. So did they think 100 years was also some kind of cosmic illusion to another type of time? How about the reduction of the lifespan to "10 year"? And reaching sexual maturity at the age of "5"? Compared to 80,000 lifespan which you say they calculated differently, 5 must be a few seconds, and the born will be dead as soon as they are.
It clearly explains that people who had 50,000 years of life span will go down to 2,500 and so on and so on. Pancha vasasa sahasasa sasaayukesu. (My English transliteration is bad). Pancha vasasathaayukanan, attathevyava sasathayukesu. The eventually it goes down to dasavasasayukesu. 10 years.
It keeps going down.
I am trying to belittle your theory brother, but if you just read this simple Sutta, your theory is completely unfounded. It seems like whoever gave this theory to you has not read the full Sutta. In fact, most of the Buddhist scholars have not read the full text. But when someone needs to analyse a part of it, one has to do it thoroughly. But was not done.
Peace.