• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Appearance and DNA mismatch

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
In multicellular differentiation within the human body, all the different cells, will have the same DNA, but each type of differentiated cell will be different in terms of form and function. These differences allows us to catalog them.

A neuron, for example, is quite different in form and function from a blood cell, even though both share the exact same DNA. When any of these differentiated cells replicate, they reproduce more of their same kind, such as our skin cells defoliating and being replaced with new skin cells, but not kidney cells, even though both use the exact same DNA. There is a control system that keeps order.

The percent approach of DNA does not tell the whole story. This is especially true in multicellular animals where there is cellular overlap, in part, allowing us to grow human ears on mice.

My theory is cellular differentiation, unfolding from stem cells, and then its control, using one set of DNA, has to do with the potential in water gradients, with the main potential created between the blood supply and the nervous system. Blood vessels and nerve tissue are near, nearly all differentiated cells ,with different ratios of the two setting the potentials needed for control. The blood water is slightly alkaline; negative, while neurons and nerves move positive charge around the water.

Consciousness and willpower, which are processed in the brain, can impact the control system by altering the nerve side of the potential gradient. For example, stress, which is often in the eyes of the beholder, can impact health; impact control over a wide range of cellular differentiations. Or, through will and choice the 90 pound weakling can chose to pump iron and become a muscle head; new body style not anticipated by the DNA of a thin person.

The story of Adam and Eve appear to be speaking less about DNA percents; new type of human DNA, and more about a change in the control system; ego and the conscious mind, that started to play a role in terms of the nerve side of the control system; new types of sickness and transcending the body.

This science is still ahead of its time and is still misunderstood, The black box empirical approach of biology misses things that are in the black box, that was once open to view. Many forms of cancer can be explained as due to a local defect in the control system, such as a dead nerve endings so cells change into transient forms that are between the quantum differentiations of heathy cell types. Someday we may be able to bing the nervous system and find these defects before they can lead to non-quantum changes.


DNA, not cells, cells are made of DNA.

Of course A&E didn't speak of DNA, it had not been discovered way back then.

And when are you going to publish your theory? I am sure thousands of cancer specialist would be keen to learn how to prevent and cure some of the deadlier cancers.
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
As of now isnt the theory of evolution just a theory in it self?
The English word 'theory' comes from θεωρίᾱ ─ a viewing. That fits well with the meaning in science, an account of what we see in nature, leading to an explanation. So when you say,

Of course the theory could one day become facts....
you're way behind the game. Scientific theories are derived from the viewing, the facts, the observation of nature, empiricism.

But of course there are no absolute statements outside of this sentence. Science advances by learning, and from learning, revising.

However, you'll find you're on particularly solid ground with the theory of evolution.
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
In appearance, purpose, functions, and characteristics, a banana (or macaque) differs 100% from a human, and the difference in DNA is 0%. Are you being deceived?

Dr. Kent Hovind. Why Kent the true PhD? He deserved even the
title ``King of England'' because of the soul's pain he suffered.
He has saved me from Darwinism and, thus, the hell.
What about him? He was destroyed. He is more hated than Adolf Hitler.
Yes, it is hatred you feel, not dis-love.
Love or Hatred, no other gods there. Christians must love own enemies. Therefore, if
the Kent is enemy, you must show perfect love to him.
It is a merciful view of reality. Jesus Christ said: Forgive them, Father, for they do not know their deed.
Is this the same Dr Kent Hovind that is a tax dodger and wife beater - has spent most of the last 10-years in Jail?
His son has disowned him and stolen his show.
Kent got his PhD from a shed in the middle of nowhere from an unrecognised college.

This is the sort of person you are glorifying
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Humans lie as DNA is naturally not seen.

Body types seen direct in status is direct. Seen by light.

And if a human can't tell the difference to a banana being the banana owning no human associated status.. body. As I'm not attached to a banana. I eat bananas.

DNA does not lie.

As i said just because you don't understand (or don't want to understand) the science does not make the science change. There is much evidence for my claims, if you would care to educate yourself i could point you in the right direction for a few peer reviewed scientific papers for you to read.

Obviously you think differently.

You don't say?
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
DNA does not lie.

As i said just because you don't understand (or don't want to understand) the science does not make the science change. There is much evidence for my claims, if you would care to educate yourself i could point you in the right direction for a few peer reviewed scientific papers for you to read.



You don't say?
I truly don't know why you think machine use is the truth.

Natural form is species by type species.

You say DNA is species specific.

Congratulations on natural observations only.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
If a man's name Dar win. Named by men who think codes read codes apply codes. Naming.

Man says I want by need to win a humans argument.

Then obviously it was.

As his topic was change to a species as the species existed first.

So summer versus win Ter. Two balances as bodies not the same type... ice then pressure returned by ice...melt versus heat...waters body then transported.

Balances.

If a human said I must make a claim to win. Then he did.

He brought our attention to the fact an ape as a species can change into a new form of ape.

So a human can also change into a new type of human by and as you lived on earth. Already.

Being the bible theme itself.

God he said changed and did it. Confessed. Of the scientist.

As we are humans and always are humans choosing both subject and topic.

Both of which don't exist when a human wasn't existing living.

A pretty basic human explanation.

You cannot thesis non self presence when you exist first.

First he said is highest status alpha species type.

Therefore we always existed said the term in explanations of a changing God stated by the human.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I truly don't know why you think machine use is the truth.

Natural form is species by type species.

You say DNA is species specific.

Congratulations on natural observations only.


DNA is not machine use

Eh?

No i say DNA is common across species, this is evidenced.


Thats how science works, by observation.
 

mangalavara

सो ऽहम्
Premium Member
He has helped me with sin of Darwinism.

As you probably know, the Koine Greek word for 'sin' is ἁμαρτία, which comes from the verb ἁμαρτάνω. The very meaning of that verb is 'to miss the mark.' If Darwinism is a sin, a failure to hit the mark, then you have to believe in a theory of evolution that makes you hit the mark. Lamarckism is obviously that theory.

I'm kidding, of course. :)
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
I could forgive him if he really wasn't knowing what he is doing. I'm all for applying Hanlon's Razor. But Kent hasn't that excuse. He has been educated about evolution multiple times but he keeps on lying about it.
What if evolution is the lie?
 

Sand Dancer

Crazy Cat Lady
In appearance, purpose, functions, and characteristics, a banana (or macaque) differs 100% from a human, and the difference in DNA is 0%. Are you being deceived?

Dr. Kent Hovind. Why Kent the true PhD? He deserved even the
title ``King of England'' because of the soul's pain he suffered.
He has saved me from Darwinism and, thus, the hell.
What about him? He was destroyed. He is more hated than Adolf Hitler.
Yes, it is hatred you feel, not dis-love.
Love or Hatred, no other gods there. Christians must love own enemies. Therefore, if
the Kent is enemy, you must show perfect love to him.
It is a merciful view of reality. Jesus Christ said: Forgive them, Father, for they do not know their deed.

He got his degrees from a diploma mill.
 

BilliardsBall

Veteran Member
In appearance, purpose, functions, and characteristics, a banana (or macaque) differs 100% from a human, and the difference in DNA is 0%. Are you being deceived?

Dr. Kent Hovind. Why Kent the true PhD? He deserved even the
title ``King of England'' because of the soul's pain he suffered.
He has saved me from Darwinism and, thus, the hell.
What about him? He was destroyed. He is more hated than Adolf Hitler.
Yes, it is hatred you feel, not dis-love.
Love or Hatred, no other gods there. Christians must love own enemies. Therefore, if
the Kent is enemy, you must show perfect love to him.
It is a merciful view of reality. Jesus Christ said: Forgive them, Father, for they do not know their deed.

One reason to stay in the Christian faith is how Christians love their enemies and non-Christians trash people like Dr. H.!
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
Tell me examples of my Grammar mistakes.
The Germany was [a] nation of liars during 1938-1945 AD.

Some countries require an article before the name, like the United States or the Netherlands. Others don't, liken Sweden, Russia or Germany.
As well, the noun "nation" requires an article in the context of the sentence.
And that are only the grammar errors.
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
What if god magic is a lie.

Evolution is one of the most researched aspects of science. Different independent scientists from all different parts pf the world. Are you saying hundreds of thousands of people, of scientists of researchers could lying when their future in science is at stake?
No I'm saying they could be misunderstanding the natural world.
 
Top