It is a false claim that you read my post when you use that language to describe it.
No I read it. So not a false claim. When your conclusion is false then your reasoning or premise are likely in error
No, you're not going to transfer your fault onto me. All that above that you wrote is all you.
I have no fault here. You are the one that jumped to a conclusion in a display of mental gymnastics in an effort to defend Trump supporters and by virtue of them Trump.
No, it wasn't. Your entire screed here is a non sequitur. You're not referring to anything I actually said in that post. It is all your imagination.
It is not my imagination that you saw that and were like "oh that old thing, how could you not get the meaning of that."
If you're going to take issue with my perception of that fake photo, don't forget your remarks about the perception of the In God We Trust motto in schools...
Not sure how my perception that some Christians are celebrating posting "in god we trust" as a gotcha moment is related.
do try to be consistent in your observations of perceptions next time, and your perceptions are completely your imagination, none the less, you should take issue first with the person who deemed it proper to post a fake photo once it was exposed as such.
That person was called out and they deleted their post. There is nothing left to take issue with there. As I said, that was addressed.
Don't create your own vulgar language fiction and attribute it to my post that in actual language I wrote made a personal observation of what turned out to be a fake photo, based on a personal attire item I own, and think that which came first, the fake photo, that invites commentary isn't relevant.
I am not sure what your reasoning for themental gymnastics was. I offered several possibilities and the all encompassing "some other reason." Unless you are stating that you had no reason, then my post didn't misrepresent your reasoning.
Of course you can do that but you look bias and myopic in your pejorative attack against me.
There was no pejorative attack. I stated that you jumped the gun to defend Trump. You did. That shows bias.
That's really bad given your pre-existing example of fabrication so as to then take issue with me based on what is your imagination alone.
I am not taking issue with you. If you felt personally attacked, that was not my intention. Biases are real. And just as some anti-trumpers need to address their bias of distorting every move of Trump's or Trump's supporter's as racism, sexism, or scandal so too do some Trump supporters need to address their bias of defending every action as wholesome, rough speaking, or misinterpreted.
In short, you're attacking yourself there. While ignoring the first cause of any commentary that arrived regarding the fake picture.
Again the fake picture was addressed. My thoughts on the fake picture? Some people have stereotyped, categorized and vilified Trump and his supporters so far that they will jump to believe anything negative because f*** Trump, see I told you how horrible they were, literally Hitler! Or some other reason.
But that post was deleted. Called out, and deleted, i.e. addressed.
