How little he knows about science is shown by how the thinks two different tests designed to find the same thing confirms his "theory". If I trusted the first test I would have predicted that the second test would show the same thing to. No ancient science needed. Too bad that I did not make a prediction. I am out of the running
Any single test can confirm, deny, or be irrelevant to any theory.
The first test, the gravimetric scan, measures gravity and "confirms" my hypothesis that the Great Pyramid (et al) are each composed of five steps which the ancients called the "five fingers of the earth". It is irrelevant to all Egyptological hypotheses other than that the pyramids were built dragging stones up ramps. The five steps make it less likely that ramps were used due to the difficulty of designing and using ramps with the steps in the way. It also raises the question that if they used ramps then why would they build steps at all. It is strong confirmation for my hypothesis that the steps were necessary because they could raise stones only the height of the water source (at a time). Since the water source was at 81' 3" the steps are 81' 3" high.
Egyptologists were hardly surprised by the test results but misinterpreted the meaning.
The second test is very old technology called infrared. They had such film for cameras as far back as the 1920's. Today's infrared imaging and use of computers to amalgamate results is far more sensitive but unnecessary to see the gross data displayed by the pyramid. These stones were extremely hot even to the touch. Technology was not even necessary to find these. Infrared is given off by "everything" that is warmer than 0 degrees kelvin. This is very cold! With this kind of technology its the warmth of something which determines its color. Things that are higher temperature are lighter colors and cooler things are darker colors. Nothing else matters except the temperature of the surface.
Temperature of a surface is determined by a multitude of factors but one is whether or not it's being heated from behind. It was knowing that there is a large object that heats during the summer and cools during the winter that told me there would be hot spots in exactly these places every October.
Conversely these spots will be very cold every March. I not only have explained these hot spots but I predicted them just as I predicted the unreleased results in the preceding sentence that is underlined.
Gravimetric and infrared imaging are not at all related in any way except that like all things they all occur simultaneously in the real world. The tides of Alpha Centauri affect the density and temperature of the Great Pyramid but in reality these effects are very very small.
Egyptologists not only couldn't predict the results of the infrared scan they can't even explain them. When they were found Egyptology issued an urgent plea to Egyptologists everywhere to explain them but NO EGYPTOLOGIST even had a guess. This is because these hot spots are incongruous with every single existing theory. They are "anomalies" which is why they are called "anomalies". But I knew in advance they were there because the builders described things that required water to flow to various points on the exterior and to flow inside and because they described a huge subsumed structure under the NE corner. Some of these could be very small and not show up but others had to show up because they needed to be tended as the pyramid was built. Specifically they needed sand shoveled out of them which is why there is sand and vaterite in the walls of the horizontal passage. "Vaterite" is a highly unstable form of calcium carbonate that is usually only seen in hot springs, and various types of geysers. The builders talked about many things that came up with the water and all of them are very interesting. They didn't describe things like sulfur dioxide in terms that we understand. They may or may not have had the words but they described the physical properties and anyone can put two and two together. This is what our species does best; add 2 ands 2. They described simpler compounds like CO2 in very great detail and even suggested that if you find it in a temperature inversion you should tip toe to survive. And they said all these things literally using words that translate as being literal.
The fact my theory makes predictions is really sufficient evidence that it is essentially correct. This doesn't mean that every point is spot on or that I really understand "Ancient Reality" merely that they did not use ramps to build the pyramids and it's a virtual certainty they were never intended or used as "tombs" by our definitions. It means they used linear funiculars or waterfilled counterweights to lift the stones to build the great pyramids just as all the physical evidence suggests.
