• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

An Interesting challenge

Segev Moran

Well-Known Member
Some years ago I participated in a rather comprehensive on line seminar on the Kabballah, and have a great appreciation of the work. I so not share your enthusiasm concerning its relationship to science, but I am willing to follow and learn.
What is your strongest scientific purview?
And i will try and give an example that matches.
 

Segev Moran

Well-Known Member
This is an area you noted above that you do not want to go, but it is good to know anyway.
I agree.. just don't want to make this post about that.
Universal Mind is the

"......station of primal reason which is known as the Prophet and the Most Great Pillar. Here reason signifieth the divine, universal mind, whose sovereignty enlighteneth all created things—nor doth it refer to every feeble brain; for it is as the wise Saná’í hath written:
can you please describe it without using spiritual concepts? (i.e divinity, prophecy and such)
How can feeble reason encompass the Qur’án,
can you please describe what is a feeble reason and how it is measured?
Or the spider snare a phoenix in his web?

Wouldst thou that the mind should not entrap thee?
Teach it the science of the love of God!" (Baha'u'llah Seven Valleys and Four Valleys.)
Science should never teach the love of God, this will make it a religion (unless you think science will prove god? (really hope you don't))
Basically it is using Faith to tap into what is the cause of creation and when we do this in unity, all will be possible.
Lets agree to disagree :)
There are quotes on this potential of the unity in mind, if you are interested.
Thanks :) I can find them though ;)
Regards Tony
Thanks :) back at you :)[/QUOTE]
 

Segev Moran

Well-Known Member
Spoken words do not change water. Please cite a scientific article for your claim.[/QUOTE]
Lol.. indeed they are not ;)
 

sealchan

Well-Known Member
What kind of insights for example?

That Abram/Abraham's experience of God has many of the same qualities as people today (including myself) who have had the experience of having a dream or vision of God.

That the story of Jacob and Esau has numerous similarities with the story of the Mahabharata.

That the above indicates that real spiritual experience and existing epic and mythic stories were used by literary artists 2000 years ago to create the narrative we call Genesis today. That we can look to our dreams for proof of the psychological nature of spiritual experience and see that these literary artists did the same. And most importantly, that all of this speaks to a common truth in a sort of imaginal, virtual realm of human experience that provides us with a perspective for understanding our potential for good and evil and how to promote the former over the later whenever possible.

Good stuff...but if you are not interested...
 

Segev Moran

Well-Known Member
Wouldn't every word cause water to vibrate in a specific manner different from other words? Wouldn't this vibration also be dependent on the frequency of the speakers voice?
Not according to what is described.
But there is a measurable way to test such things i assume.
That's one of what interests me.
some descriptions describe an outcome that is measurable these days. wouldn't you say it will be very interesting to examine such things?
so for this question as an example, i would really love to hear from a physicists if there is any way based on our current knowledge of reality that such thing can happen.
 

TransmutingSoul

Veteran Member
Premium Member
can you please describe it without using spiritual concepts? (i.e divinity, prophecy and such)

Science should never teach the love of God, this will make it a religion (unless you think science will prove god? (really hope you don't))

Both these questions tie into each other. I am happy to say, I will confirm what you hoped would not be so ;)

Faith and Science will both take us to the same source, there is no way out of this. Call it God or a Big Bang, life is evolving from the original potential.

The Universal Mind, Holy Spirit, Primal Will is the source of all potential and all Faith and All Science can only tap into that Potential.

Everything we can Fathom or find in the future or bring from the unknown to the known, is already in this Universal Mind. The Universal Mind goes beyond our capacity to know.

can you please describe what is a feeble reason and how it is measured?

Our use of Mind, without the aid of Universal Mind. Also our distortion of Universal Mind.

Lets agree to disagree :)

Always happy to agree with this. You know we will always wish you well in your search for all Truth.

Regards Tony
 

Segev Moran

Well-Known Member
That Abram/Abraham's experience of God has many of the same qualities as people today
(including myself) who have had the experience of having a dream or vision of God.
How do you know it was Gods?
That the story of Jacob and Esau has numerous similarities with the story of the Mahabharata.
All religious writings have similarities with other religions.
That the above indicates that real spiritual experience
I have yet to encounter someone that had a real spiritual experience that was not subjective.
and subjective issues are irrelevant to a scientific approach.
When i say spiritual,
and existing epic and mythic stories were used by literary artists 2000 years ago to create the narrative we call Genesis today. That we can look to our dreams
i find the biblical literal story very disturbing.
it presents a very bad era of violence and abusive behavior.
(starting at the "6th" day)
for proof of the psychological nature of spiritual experience
and see that these literary artists did the same.
if you could prove spirituality, it will not be spirituality.
I couldn't care less about proving the spiritual :)
Eventually a spiritual realm either exist or not.
If it does and doesn't affect my reality, great. don't care :)
If it does and does affect my reality, i could have measure it thus rendering it not spiritual.
If it doesn't exist, nothing really changed from my POV.
I am not looking for proving the Kbl...
It is obviously not possible.
And most importantly, that all of this speaks to a common truth
Disagree.
It is common, not sure about the truth part ;)
in a sort of imaginal,
Thus not truth?
I think common subjective truth will be a better phrase?
virtual realm of human experience that provides us with a perspective for understanding our potential for good and evil
I really really really hope that is not what leads us to decide what is good and bad.
those stories are far from being a representation of goodness or kindness.
and how to promote the former over the later whenever possible.
Good stuff...but if you are not interested...
Indeed not interested :)
But thanks :)
 

Segev Moran

Well-Known Member
Faith and Science will both take us to the same source, there is no way out of this. Call it God or a Big Bang, life is evolving from the original potential.
I really disagree here.
how does the concept of big bang relates to having a deity?
The Universal Mind, Holy Spirit, Primal Will is the source of all potential and all Faith and All Science can only tap into that Potential.
Same can be said on any religion.
Everything we can Fathom or find in the future or bring from the unknown to the known, is already in this Universal Mind.
Or mega computer ;)
The Universal Mind goes beyond our capacity to know.
How do you know?
Always happy to agree with this. You know we will always wish you well in your search for all Truth.

Regards Tony
There is no such thing as "all Truth", but thanks :)
 

TransmutingSoul

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I really disagree here.
how does the concept of big bang relates to having a deity?

Creation had a source. Call it what and how you wish to.

I have found the source was God, no doubt for me.

Same can be said on any religion

That is the Message given by Baha'u'llah. All Faith is from the same source. It is Baha'u'llah that has given the teaching that Science and Religion are both given to source what is Truth.

Or mega computer

The Computer required to be created and to then be programed.

It is a refelction of our brain, to which was created and needs the right program to give the right answer.

Hackers have done a good job with this.:D;)

How do you know

If what Baha'u'llah has offered is False, then nothing since time began is right. All science can find will onl make the Message given by Baha'u'llah more apparent.

We know that creation has no limits, that the worlds are beyond calculation, that all have creatures, that some have creatures that have the ability to know and love God as we can and that one day we will traverse Time and Space easily and swiftly. Magnetism will be the source of this capacity.

And, oh so much more. :)

Regards Tony
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
What is your strongest scientific purview?

Career Environmental/Hydrology Geologist and Soil Scientist with a heavy background in biology, chemistry, genetics and evolution.

I find insight into science in the different religions like, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism and the Baha'i Faith.

Baha'i example: THE SEVEN VALLEYS Baha'u'llah; "Split the atom's heart, and lo! Within it thou wilt find a sun."
 
Last edited:

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Hi All,'t know.
There is too much to learn and not much time ;)

So my challenge is finding a group of people with a vast knowledge of sciences (preferably atheists [not because i have something against theist scientists, rather because i think someone who treats god only as an idea will be more objective in this case] although if one is open minded and will not be offended of things that might be said, i think it will be a great value) that are willing to take a dive to a very interesting idea of trying and finding a scientific discoveries BASED on the Kabbalah rather then disregarding it as a myth or just another religion.

I

Cheers :)

I'm not the person you are requesting but this paragraph was intriguing. Isn't eliminating theist scientists automatically makes you less objective?
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
It will be difficult for a scientist to participate in a scientific discussion when all they have to work with is "this spoken word affects water in some particular way".

This is not science. IT is foolish bogus 'arguing from ignorance,' to justify a religious agenda.
 

Thermos aquaticus

Well-Known Member
This is not science.

It could be, but it isn't science as of now. If we had a specific and well designed methodology as well as the data from the experiment we could at least assess what type of conclusions we could begin to draw, or what types of hypotheses could be tested with the data. As of now, "when you say something it causes water to do this thing" falls quite short of what we would call science.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
It could be, but it isn't science as of now. If we had a specific and well designed methodology as well as the data from the experiment we could at least assess what type of conclusions we could begin to draw, or what types of hypotheses could be tested with the data. As of now, "when you say something it causes water to do this thing" falls quite short of what we would call science.

We have a specific methodology in science that works, because airplanes fly, computers work, and medicine is advancing cures for disease. It is Methodological Naturalism.

Again, It is foolish bogus 'arguing from ignorance,' to justify a religious agenda.
 

Segev Moran

Well-Known Member
Creation had a source. Call it what and how you wish to.
I call it unknown :)
I have found the source was God, no doubt for me.
It is good to hear :)
That is the Message given by Baha'u'llah. All Faith is from the same source.
Can you explain?
I don't wish to learn about the terms and concepts of things, rather have an understanding of what they represent.
It is Baha'u'llah that has given the teaching that Science and Religion are both given to source what is Truth.
How did it give it?
What was the process of the creation of those gitfs?
and please, do not answer in more cryptic terms, rather try and explain it in a more scientific terms.
The Computer required to be created and to then be programed.
If you assume we are a simulation ;)
It is a refelction of our brain, to which was created and needs the right program to give the right answer.
Lost me here
Hackers have done a good job with this.:D;)

If what Baha'u'llah has offered is False, then nothing since time began is right.
So how do you know that it is certain that we do not live in a false universe?
Assuming that nothing since time began is right, we treat the false as the right, we have no ability to know if we do right or wrong based on your belief?
All science can find will onl make the Message given by Baha'u'llah more apparent.
Great :) That's exactly what i am looking for :))
Can you give an example of something that can be described in a scientific manner?
We know that creation has no limits
How do you know that?
that the worlds are beyond calculation, that all have creatures, that some have creatures that have the ability to know and love God as we can and that one day we will traverse Time and Space easily and swiftly. Magnetism will be the source of this capacity.
Do you think alien civilization will worship the same god as humans? and if so which one will that be?
And, oh so much more. :)

Regards Tony
It does sound very detailed, but not in a way i understand.
Regards 2u2 :)
 
Top