Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
To pose a question with such an obvious answer suggests that some tricky word play looms.An artist creates the greatest masterpiece the world has ever known. The next day a diabolical hater of art burns the masterpiece to ashes.
From a purely scientific standpoint, who was the creator and who was the destroyer?
I don't believe you.No clever catch
The question can't be answered because, as I pointed out, it isn't a scientific question. The answer you want us to give is given in the question but that leads us back to the catch you claim isn't there.but the answer is given away in the question.
Yes, your artist represents God and your arsonist represents atheists. Your proposition is that God created a perfect world and we're destroying it. I believe you're wrong (at least on the first point) but I'm more than happy debating that.I posted this in the Atheist forum.
Yes, your artist represents God and your arsonist represents atheists. Your proposition is that God created a perfect world and we're destroying it. I believe you're wrong (at least on the first point) but I'm more than happy debating that.
I don't believe you.
The question can't be answered because, as I pointed out, it isn't a scientific question. The answer you want us to give is given in the question but that leads us back to the catch you claim isn't there.
Yes, your artist represents God and your arsonist represents atheists. Your proposition is that God created a perfect world and we're destroying it. I believe you're wrong (at least on the first point) but I'm more than happy debating that.
What I'm not willing to do is play all the silly word games to just get to the basis of that debate. Don't waste your time and ours, just get to the point.
There is no need to be so sensitive but that was a great answer just as the first answer was really good. BTW both yours and the first were still wrong. The artist isn't God. The artist is just an artist and the arsonist is just a diabolical hater of art.
So what does it have to do with atheism? You're still not getting to the point.The artist isn't God. The artist is just an artist and the arsonist is just a diabolical hater of art.
Can I see my results, doc? Did I... Did I pass the test? -breathes heavily-
There is no destruction in science. Matter cannot be destroyed only changed into something else. So Both are creators.
The one who burned created something new as they destroyed.An artist creates the greatest masterpiece the world has ever known. The next day a diabolical hater of art burns the masterpiece to ashes.
From a purely scientific standpoint, who was the creator and who was the destroyer?
The one who burned created something new as they destroyed.
The one who painted destroyed materials as they created the masterpiece.
From a purely scientific standpoint, no matter or energy was created or destroyed during the events, so there was no creator or destroyer.