To be clear, this is your opinion of what the Bible teaches. It is not the opinion of other Christians. Personally, I do not think saying that only Christianity is the only way to God, is good news at all. It's pretty terrible news for those who can't swallow what is presented as Christianity to them by fundamentalist preachers. I do not believe the path to God is fundamentalism. Only fundamentalists think that. They insert themselves between God and humans, claiming they speak for the Christ.
You're playing bad semantics here. Exclusivism means something specific when it comes to Christian views. It contrasts with inclusivism and with pluralism within Christian beliefs:
Exclusivism - Wikipedia
Religious exclusivism, one of the three classic typologies created by
Alan Race in order to describe religions relative to one another, states that one religion, to the exclusion of all others, has the correct understanding of God, truth and salvation and eternal paradise is contingent on one's belief in the core tenets of that religion.
Diana Eck states, ‘Exclusivism is more than simply a conviction about the transformative power of the particular vision one has; it is a conviction about its finality and its absolute priority over competing views’.
[1]
While it was originally used to define Christianity, exclusivism can apply to any religious belief system, as can Race’s other two categories
inclusivism and
pluralism. In his 1982
Christians and Religious Pluralism, Race defined pluralism as all religions being equally beneficial, with no single religion dominating. Inclusivism attempts to straddle the poles of pluralism and exclusivism by agreeing with the latter that one religion (Christianity) has the most value, and agreeing with the former by stating that other religions still have significant value.
[2] While Race’s three categories have been criticized, amended and refuted, most religious studies and interfaith scholars and students find the typologies useful as a starting point for conversations about the diversity of religions.
[3]
So we're going to set aside playing games with the word "exclusive" here, and go with these
typologies, as that is a meaningful discussion. If you want to twist words around to make them fit, and lose these distinctions, then you have no legitimate argument worth anyone's time to listen to.
Again, you are playing semantic games here. This is not meaningful. It's only making you believe you are right, without actually understanding the actual distinctions that make meaningful conversation.