Ahmadiyyas

[Fool]

Ahmadi Muslims believe that there cannot be a conflict between the word of God and the work of God, and thus religion and science must work in harmony with each other.


Is that possible?

 

[WalterTrull]

Sure. If God is and science is, it's happening.

 

[PureX]

Ahmadiyyas

Motzimartus!

 

[Sunstone]

How do they resolve seeming conflicts between the world of God and God's works as revealed by the sciences?

 

[paarsurrey]

I don't get it exactly, please elaborate.
Regards

 

[Vinayaka]

Glas you came byy, Paar. You should be able to elucidate the Ammadiya POV for those who have questions.

 

[paarsurrey]

Ahmadi Muslims believe that there cannot be a conflict between the word of God and the work of God, and thus religion and science must work in harmony with each other.

Is that possible?

Why should it not be possible? What is the difficulty? Please
Regards

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

Came for the
"Please
Regards"

Did not leave disappointed.

 

[paarsurrey]

Sure. If God is and science is, it's happening.

Yes, science is progressing in service of humanity without any restrictions from G-d as per His scheme and design of life. Right, please?
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

Glas you came byy, Paar. You should be able to elucidate the Ammadiya POV for those who have questions.

OK, I will try.
But nobody enlightened us as to the problem difficulties the global society is to face if there is no conflict between the word of God and the work of God, and thus religion and science work in harmony with each other.
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

So, I believe it to be correct to conclude that everybody agrees that there is no primary conflict between religion (the "Word of God") and science (the "work of God"). Right, please?
Regards

 

[WalterTrull]

there is no primary conflict

True.

 

[paarsurrey]

Ahmadiyyas

There is no primary conflict between religion (the "Word of God") and science (the "work of God"). I believe there cannot be if correctly understood.

(Ahmadiyya) Muslims believe following primary articles of faith:

1. Unity of God
2. His Angels
3. His Books
4. His Prophets
5. The Last Day
6. Divine Decree

and believe following as pillars of Islam:

1. Kalima
2. Prayer
3. Fasting
4. Zakaat
5. Hajj

Islam Ahmadiyya - Ahmadiyya Muslim Community - Al Islam Online - Official Website

None of the above , I believe, has any conflict with science.
Right,please?

Regards

_________
Please click on each one of them for details.

 

[Fool]

So, I believe it to be correct to conclude that everybody agrees that there is no primary conflict between religion (the "Word of God") and science (the "work of God"). Right, please?
Regards

agreed, there can be only one Absolute.

 

[paarsurrey]

Ahmadiyyas

There is no primary conflict between religion (the "Word of God") and science (the "work of God"). I believe there cannot be if correctly understood.

(Ahmadiyya) Muslims believe following primary articles of faith:

1. Unity of God
2. His Angels
3. His Books
4. His Prophets
5. The Last Day
6. Divine Decree

and believe following as pillars of Islam:

1. Kalima
2. Prayer
3. Fasting
4. Zakaat
5. Hajj

Islam Ahmadiyya - Ahmadiyya Muslim Community - Al Islam Online - Official Website

None of the above , I believe, has any conflict with science.
Right,please?

Regards

_________
Please click on each one of them for details.

Science has never taken anything from the above for instance "Hajj" as an issue of science, because it is incapable or has no tools to tells anything about it.
It shows that religion has not conflict with science, please.
Regards

 

[England my lionheart]

Ahmadi Muslims believe that there cannot be a conflict between the word of God and the work of God, and thus religion and science must work in harmony with each other.


Is that possible?

I don't see a "must" here, to work in harmony with something it's got to be something real, if we say "can science have a conflict with something made purely of faith", for me I doubt that very much.

 

[paarsurrey]

I don't see a "must" here, to work in harmony with something it's got to be something real, if we say "can science have a conflict with something made purely of faith", for me I doubt that very much.

I believe Science does not lawfully comment on the issues of religion. Has it done it ever, please?
Regards

 

[England my lionheart]

I believe Science does not lawfully comment on the issues of religion. Has it done it ever, please?
Regards

We'll that's because God angels prophets etc cannot be tested with scientific evidence, there is none, I'm no scientist but isn't that how it works?.

 

[paarsurrey]

We'll that's because God angels prophets etc cannot be tested with scientific evidence, there is none, I'm no scientist but isn't that how it works?.

It becomes evident that Science is irrelevant in matters of Revealed Religion, so it is very wise not to indulge in it. Right, please?
Revealed Religion has its own matrices to sort its issues, it does not need Science being irrelevant. Right, please?
Regards

 

[Fool]

I don't see a "must" here, to work in harmony with something it's got to be something real, if we say "can science have a conflict with something made purely of faith", for me I doubt that very much.

science doesn't usually make a subjective decision regarding phenomena of any nature; unless it subverts or suppresses the search for truth. religion of any value shouldn't either.