Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is it better to fall in love and/or to be crushed by it? or is it better never to have been hurt?
Anyone who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; anyone on whom it falls will be crushed."
what you think?
Sometimes I think love is a Rite of Passage.Is it better to fall in love and/or to be crushed by it? or is it better never to have been hurt?
Anyone who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; anyone on whom it falls will be crushed."
what you think?
I think you are quoting a scripture that has nothing to do with love.Is it better to fall in love and/or to be crushed by it? or is it better never to have been hurt?
Anyone who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; anyone on whom it falls will be crushed."
what you think?
Is it better to fall in love and/or to be crushed by it? or is it better never to have been hurt?
Anyone who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; anyone on whom it falls will be crushed."
what you think?
Sometimes I think love is a Rite of Passage.
I think you are quoting a scripture that has nothing to do with love.
Humans were made to live as wife and husband bound by the bond of love. At first the love is emotional mostly, later it turns to become something stronger. A couple becomes one flesh, though they will have various problems during their time. If they work through these they will end their lives together having enjoyed their time together mostly.
love between friends is greater than the love between a male and female.
jesus said there was no greater love than that of a friend. a husband and wife are not necessarily friends.
Not is greater, but may be greater. It depends - doesn't it.love between friends is greater than the love between a male and female.
Also depending on that couple. When they become one, that love is not one of Eros, as it is one of being ehh, one.a husband and wife are not necessarily friends.
If one has a friendship as David and Jonathan had, it is clearly a very strong bond of love, a pure kind, a different kind than that of wife and husband.
If it had been more, a homosexual thing, God would have damned David. It is that simple. Under the Mosaic Law, there is no other way to look at it.Are you certain that's all it was between David and Jonathan?
2 Samuel 1:26 I grieve for you, Jonathan my brother; you were very dear to me. Your love for me was wonderful, more wonderful than that of women.
If it had been more, a homosexual thing, God would have damned David. It is that simple. Under the Mosaic Law, there is no other way to look at it.
wasn't the Carpenter speaking of the law?....when the quote was dealtIs it better to fall in love and/or to be crushed by it? or is it better never to have been hurt?
Anyone who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; anyone on whom it falls will be crushed."
what you think?
and the Carpenter was betrayed with a kissIf it had been more, a homosexual thing, God would have damned David. It is that simple. Under the Mosaic Law, there is no other way to look at it.
Things do not have to be physical in this kind of friendship. Especially when life and death situations are part of what the friendship turns about.
When I was a child, many women would be strong friends, hold hands, etc. Yet, this had nothing to do with being homosexual. Only lately, the last 20/30 years has this taken hold so that the old style friendships are no longer thought about when two girls hold hands. It is a shame. I am from a culture where boys do not hold hands, and kissing even a father is against my culture. However, in other cultures, when males kissed (Russia ???) it was in public and not homosexual in olden times. This, is beyond my experience and knowledge.
If it had been more, a homosexual thing, God would have damned David. It is that simple. Under the Mosaic Law, there is no other way to look at it.
Things do not have to be physical in this kind of friendship. Especially when life and death situations are part of what the friendship turns about.
When I read that, I think of a kiss on the cheek. Such can still be done tenderly, among friends, parent and child. It is not part of my culture however. Kissing even a father is giving me the chills.and the Carpenter was betrayed with a kiss
did it break His heart?
I think the laying of swords upon His Last Supper table
was the moment of His heart ache
yeh ..... a kiss on the cheek.....sureWhen I read that, I think of a kiss on the cheek. Such can still be done tenderly, among friends, parent and child. It is not part of my culture however. Kissing even a father is giving me the chills.
Breaking his heart
I am sure it was a sad experience for Jesus. However, if you recall, Judas had long had his hands in the till and stolen money. Jesus was aware of this, and if we read the account and prophecies, it was clear that one of the 12 when selected was selected so as to fulfill the prophecy. His qualities were known from that moment he was chosen; though, it was his own greed that made him fail.