I'm not Orthodox. I don't believe that Moses literally wrote the Five Books, nor do I believe that any are literally the dictated word of God. However, I am not claiming that Moses has personally taught me anything.
And I think it is entirely relevant that you are claiming that Jesus has taught you what would be unique and radically different Jewish interpretations of Jewish text, yet you seem to be perfectly comfortably admitting that everything in your scriptures is the result of an oral tradition-- an oral tradition, which, by the time it was written down only decades or centuries after Jesus' lifetime was already massively dominated by, assembled by, and redacted by non-Jews. There is, in short, ample reason to suppose that little, if anything, in the Christian scriptures is, in fact, literal teachings of the historical Jesus.
This is in stark contrast to Jewish scriptures and sacred texts, both Biblical and Rabbinic, which have never been assembled, redacted, or otherwise fundamentally interfered with by non-Jews. Whatever the authorship, it is a Jewish authorship. Whatever the redactorship, it is a Jewish redactorship. Whatever the evolutions of thought in the history of Jewish sacred texts and their interpretation, the constant has been that it was always Jews doing the thinking, writing, and interpreting.
Christianity is not Judaism. It is a separate religion. It is a religion of non-Jews, and has been since very shortly after Jesus' lifetime. And the convoluted theology and interpretation that you have been presenting in this thread is Christian. It is not Jewish. The fact that you worship a dead Jew does not make what you say Jewish. If anything, it makes it even less Jewish. I have no problem with it as Christianity, as a non-Jewish theology and interpretation for non-Jews. But as soon as you begin presenting it as having any kind of Jewish legitimacy or authenticity, we have a problem, because it has neither.
