Salam dear brother.
Brother, I thnik that there is a misunderstanding here. I did not say that Al is a pronoun. I said that according to Arabic Nahv, 'Al' can be used as
an alternative for objective pronouns. Yes, Al is a definite article, but you should know that there is not any contradiction. For example, in Quran the term Al-Ma'wa (المأوى) has been used, and Al mades it a difinite noun and so that, it means his Ma'wa [Quran, 79: But as for him who is awed to stand before his Lord and restrains his soul from [following] desires, (
40) his refuge will indeed be paradise. (
41)]. according to Arabic, when an object pronoun is added to a noun, this pronoun makes it difinite. So, in this case Al-Ma'wa (المأوى) is equal to Ma'waho (مأواه) and Al has been used as an alternative for it. Because the object pronoun makes noun difinite, so using Al and object pronoun simultaneously is not allowed, i.e., Al-Ma'waho (المأواه) is incorrect.
Dear brother, here is the translations of different translators that have translated Zi Al-Qurba as the relatives of Prophet (s):
Daryabadi: And know that whatsoever ye obtain of spoils then verily unto Allah belongeth a fifth thereof and unto the apostle and unto
his kindreds ...
Hilali and Khan: And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allah, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [
of the Messenger (Muhammad SAW)], ...
Mubarakpuri: And know that whatever of war booty that you may gain, verily, one-fifth of it is assigned to Allah, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives (
of the Messenger),
Saheeh international: And know that anything you obtain of war booty - then indeed, for Allah is one fifth of it and for the Messenger and for [
his] near relatives ...
Wahiduddin Khan: Know that one-fifth of your battle gains belongs to God and the Messenger, to
his close relatives ...
And
all of Shia scholars who believe that Khums is only for the poor descendants of Prophet Muhammad (s). Also Hadhrat Ali ibn Al-Husain (as), who is our 4th Imam and one of the bests Tabeiins and Ahlul Bayt for Sunnis has said that the Ayat is about the relatives of Prophet (s).
Dear brother, Tabari is not the writer of the Satanic verses. He has indeed narrated this fabricated narration in his book. You shoul know that every scholar can make mistakes and this is one of the mistakes of Tabari. This does not reject his correct views about Arabic language and his correct Tafsirs.
Best wishes.