• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Abortion

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Good.
You'd be surprised how many feticide rights people don't think that the life cycle of a Primate applies to human beings.
Tom
You are simply wrong in this statement. And using loaded terminology is not an honest approach to the problem. This is a dishonest attempt to shift the burden of proof at the best.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I read it in a science textbook.
You might want to try that.

Or continue posting like a Creationist, where science doesn't matter if it interferes with a pre-existing condition.
Tom
I understood that textbook. You obviously did not. Your misapplication of science does you no good here.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Where?
Tom

You keep claiming that a fetus is human but the best that you can offer is an equivocation fallacy. If you want to claim that a fetus has the same rights as a person the burden of proof is upon you. Failed analogies do you no good in this debate, you need to prove your claim first, then you can apply the analogies that you have been trying to use.
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
It's rather like driving a car.
If you can't take responsibility for the possible outcome of causing harm, then driving is irresponsible.
Same with sex. If having potentially fertile sex, while in a situation where you'd rather kill your offspring than provide the most basic needs, you are behaving irresponsibly.
Tom
Again that is a matter of perspective. Calling someone irresponsible is really just name calling here. I get that you feel they are irresponsible but the argument making that connection has not been shown.
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
Good.
You'd be surprised how many feticide rights people don't think that the life cycle of a Primate applies to human beings.
Tom
The problem here, for many, is the term "human being" as distinguished from "homo sapiens" It is a waste of time to argue over definitions. If you want to call them human beings that is fine. I am okay with justified killings of human beings.
 

allright

Active Member
You are not paying attention. I don't know. You don't know. You can't ban an activity based upon a lack of knowledge. The only ones that can be said to know are those that are pregnant in regards to their own pregnancy. Until you prove that it is a "human" life the burden of proof is upon those opposing abortion.

Your not sure if a baby in its ninth month is a human
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
I am okay with justified killings of human beings.
Who does the justifying?
You? Hitler? 19th century slavers? Genghis Khan? Cortez? Mao? Pol Pot? Roy Moore?

I am a hard core Pro-Lifer. I am not Ok with anybody choosing death for other human beings.
Tom
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
Who does the justifying?
You? Hitler? 19th century slavers? Genghis Khan? Cortez? Mao? Pol Pot? Roy Moore?

I am a hard core Pro-Lifer. I am not Ok with anybody choosing death for other human beings.
Tom
Well each individual does the justifying, they are the ones who are making the choice. If there is no justification for you imposing the restriction not to kill, then it is a justified killings because it is within their choice.

You don't believe in self defense? On what grounds do you exempt human beings. If you are a hardcore pro lifer why not be against any loss of life? You can enjoy martyrdom and turning the other cheek. I am realistic about the world. I believe killing is a part of it.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I don't know who that is.
Tom
There was a link.

Savita Halappanavar was a pregnant woman who was admitted to an Irish hospital with a blood infection. She needed an abortion to address the problem, but Irish law prohibits abortion except to save the woman's life. Because of this, the doctors waited... despite the fact that they deemed a miscarriage inevitable and despite the fact that Halappanavar requested one. They waited until the fetus actually miscarried before taking action. By the time they did, it was too late: she became septic and died.

This is the sort of situation that is created by laws that prohibit abortion except to save the woman's life: they make doctors unwilling to do life-saving abortions unless they're sure the woman is past the point where, at an inquest or trial after the fact, no expert witness would be able to say "it's possible she could have survived without an abortion."

So you are okay with those deaths, right?
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
There was a link.

Savita Halappanavar was a pregnant woman who was admitted to an Irish hospital with a blood infection. She needed an abortion to address the problem, but Irish law prohibits abortion except to save the woman's life. Because of this, the doctors waited... despite the fact that they deemed a miscarriage inevitable and despite the fact that Halappanavar requested one. They waited until the fetus actually miscarried before taking action. By the time they did, it was too late: she became septic and died.

This is the sort of situation that is created by laws that prohibit abortion except to save the woman's life: they make doctors unwilling to do life-saving abortions unless they're sure the woman is past the point where, at an inquest or trial after the fact, no expert witness would be able to say "it's possible she could have survived without an abortion."

So you are okay with those deaths, right?
As I understood him, he is not okay for choosing to kill a human (including all stages of the human life cycle for any reason). In other words, he is not okay with abortion even to save the pregnant woman's life.
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
No, actually we don't.
We humans learn from each other.
And get better at living quality lives.
Tim
That makes no sense in this context. If someone is about to kill my son and I kill them first, I made a decision. I justified that decision on my beliefs. So how is it not the individual who does the justifying?
 
Top