I think a problem you have is that you do not read what I have said.
The problem is whar you said. Clear it up based on science.
Science does not deal with those questions outside science. It is both scientists and others who deal with them outside science and when non scientists hear that science sees life as coming from chemicals and that life could be on other planets because the chemicals are there it certainly gives the impression to laymen that science sees life as chemicals only. And let's face it, that is what science is seeking to show imo and that even consciousness comes from those chemicals.
The 'certainly gives the impression' from the layman's perspective is not meaningful unless science as science is taken into consideration. Yes, the present evidence demonstrates that life developed from inorganic chemicals, and yes it could be on other planets. This does negate the Creation of life by God through natural methods. Yes the 'Objective Verifiable evidence' demonstrates that consciousness came about through evolution as the nervous system evolved. Consciousness has been demonstrated as throughout the animal world by degrees where animals have a complex nervous system
I know you want to defend poor defenceless science, but maybe inadvertently it is heading towards showing that God is not needed. But of course it has not succeeded, it hypothesises only, but the public does not know that, especially impressionable kids who love science.
Science will not likely never be able to demonstrate God does not exist, nor determine the necessity of God, which is far far beyond the limits of science.
Biased extreme sarcasm and an arogant agressie begative view of science noted. Science is in no way 'poor defenseless.' It is supported by the 'Objective Verifiable Evidence' where theological worldviews have none beyond belief and faith, Yes science has succeeded in the consensus of 95%+ of all scientists where Theological beliefs and faith lack any sense of agreement with thousands of different and conflicting beliefs.
Where is there any 'Objective Verifiable Evidence' that supports one religious belief is true and the others are fals?