A Trophy Hunt

[Secret Chief]

That was, i hope, unworthy of you.
Its certainly unworthy of an answer.

Eta
Ok, @ we never know, ya got me....what's funny?

Why?

 

[Audie]

Why?

Why dont i want to honour a buncha snark?

If you are interested in why what I said re hunting and conservation makes sense,
ask sensible questions in a normally
respectful way and i dont mind addressing them.

 

[Secret Chief]

Why dont i want to honour a buncha snark?

If you are interested in why what I said re hunting and conservation makes sense,
ask sensible questions in a normally
respectful way and i dont mind addressing them.

I simply responded to your "points", which I found to demonstrate a dismissive and callous attitude to the lives of non-human animals. You apparently believe that the life of a non-human sentient being is of so little value that if it is not required (sic) for breeding then it does not matter if it is killed even if for no other reason than to provide a perverse thrill. Such an attitude is what lies at the root of the human abuse and destruction of the biosphere.

 

[Revoltingest]

I simply responded to your "points", which I found to demonstrate a dismissive and callous attitude to the lives of non-human animals. You apparently believe that the life of a non-human sentient being is of so little value that if it is not required (sic) for breeding then it does not matter if it is killed even if for no other reason than to provide a perverse thrill. Such an attitude is what lies at the root of the human abuse and destruction of the biosphere.

If I may clarify, breeding of valued animals whose population
is threatened (eg, by habitat loss) is important. Human breeding
is no problem....nay, human over-breeding is the problem.
I suggest not making breeding about her personally.
That's inappropriately personal.

 

[Audie]

I simply responded to your "points", which I found to demonstrate a dismissive and callous attitude to the lives of non-human animals. You apparently believe that the life of a non-human sentient being is of so little value that if it is not required (sic) for breeding then it does not matter if it is killed even if for no other reason than to provide a perverse thrill. Such an attitude is what lies at the root of the human abuse and destruction of the biosphere.

Your "findings", your chosen interpretation is very far from correct.
And you choose to double down rather than ask.

" dismissive, callous, perverse, abuse, destruction" is hardly an improvement on snark.

Nothing sensible, zero respect
in what you wrote.

You are welcome to try again.

 

[Audie]

If I may clarify, breeding of valued animals whose population
is threatened (eg, by habitat loss) is important. Human breeding
is no problem....nay, human over-breeding is the problem.
I suggest not making breeding about her personally.
That's inappropriately personal.

All this thread has seen from the "anti"
folks is emotionalism.
Im no hunter, I am vegetarian for ethical
reasons, and, yeah, I only finished one year
of grad school in biology but i do have some-
I will be a whole lot more- awareness of population dynamics, ecological relationships
and blah than any here who are indulging themselves virtue signaling how concerned
they are.

 

[Secret Chief]

You are welcome to try again.

My words result from my perception of your words, I stand by them all. They are not "snark" imo but don't worry there'll be no more.

 

[Audie]

My words result from my perception of your words, I stand by them all. They are not "snark" imo but don't worry there'll be no more.

Dont know, dont care, do t want to know but you are
a gonna stand by it.

Makings for a good creationist, there.

Get new batteries for yr snark detector.