Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber
Both places are predominantly Republican. Especially Indiana.Yup. And the Democrats in both places initiated that.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Both places are predominantly Republican. Especially Indiana.Yup. And the Democrats in both places initiated that.
Both places are predominantly Republican. Especially Indiana.
In my town, Republicans cannot be blamed....there areAll it takes is one Democrat to initiate it.
Indiana was not a Democrat stronghold the last time that I checked.Yup. And the Democrats in both places initiated that.
...Whenever you see a speed light camera, thank the Democrats.
Someone is not dealing with reality.All it takes is one Democrat to initiate it.
Indiana was not a Democrat stronghold the last time that I checked.
Someone is not dealing with reality.
It is not wise to say that just because a politician does something that you do not like that he is a "Democrat". By doing so you put yourself out on the fringes. A useful tool for the Republicans but your views will easily be tossed aside if they get in the way.You think Arizona is or was? All it took was Janet Napolitano.
It is not wise to say that just because a politician does something that you do not like that he is a "Democrat". By doing so you put yourself out on the fringes. A useful tool for the Republicans but your views will easily be tossed aside if they get in the way.
You just lost. When you make a rather exorbitant claim you put the burden of proof upon yourself. If you cannot support your claim the only logical action is to treat it as false.You can't prove me wrong, because there has never been a Republican who has pushed for legislation on this.
You just lost. When you make a rather exorbitant claim you put the burden of proof upon yourself. If you cannot support your claim the only logical action is to treat it as false.
Attempting to shift the burden of proof is a losing tactic.
How about we take turns, I'll show you a Democrat maintaining speed cameras, and then you show me a Republican... If you can...
...Or are you too chicken to accept the challenge?
I'll start:
Arizona Speed Cameras Expect $165 Million Annual Revenue
Not really interested since you already lost the debate. I never claimed that Democrats do not install those cameras.
By the way, trying to change the debate after you lost is a losing strategy as well.
No, you lost and are running away yourself. You tried to change the debate. If anyone is chicken here it is not me.
Yeah, except it wasn't democrats. They were very rare breed in rural north central Indiana, and even rarer in power. This being the same state where in the other thread my biology teacher skipped teaching evolution because it went against her conservative christian beliefs.All it takes is one Democrat to initiate it.
No, you lost and are running away yourself. You tried to change the debate. If anyone is chicken here it is not me.
You failed. Try again.
George Bush Jr. is one of the worst with his PATRIOT act that he did sign into law.Come on, @Subduction Zone... Show me one...Single...Republican calling for the cameras.
...That's all you have to do.
Nope, you made a positive assertion. Try again.You're the one asking me to prove a negative. The fallacy is on you... you lose.
Nope, you made a positive assertion. Try again.
You might want to try to work on your logic skills just a tad. Do you need me to quote you where you doomed yourself?
George Bush Jr. is one of the worst with his PATRIOT act that he did sign into law.