• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A real American hero

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You think Arizona is or was? All it took was Janet Napolitano.
It is not wise to say that just because a politician does something that you do not like that he is a "Democrat". By doing so you put yourself out on the fringes. A useful tool for the Republicans but your views will easily be tossed aside if they get in the way.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
It is not wise to say that just because a politician does something that you do not like that he is a "Democrat". By doing so you put yourself out on the fringes. A useful tool for the Republicans but your views will easily be tossed aside if they get in the way.

You can't prove me wrong, because there has never been a Republican who has pushed for legislation on this.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You can't prove me wrong, because there has never been a Republican who has pushed for legislation on this.
You just lost. When you make a rather exorbitant claim you put the burden of proof upon yourself. If you cannot support your claim the only logical action is to treat it as false.

Attempting to shift the burden of proof is a losing tactic.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
You just lost. When you make a rather exorbitant claim you put the burden of proof upon yourself. If you cannot support your claim the only logical action is to treat it as false.

Attempting to shift the burden of proof is a losing tactic.

How about we take turns, I'll show you a Democrat maintaining speed cameras, and then you show me a Republican... If you can...;)

...Or are you too chicken to accept the challenge?

I'll start:

"Arizona Speed Cameras Expect $165 Million Annual Revenue
One-tenth of the Arizona state budget deficit will be covered by photo radar profit by 2010. Governor calls for HOV lane cameras"
Arizona Speed Cameras Expect $165 Million Annual Revenue
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
How about we take turns, I'll show you a Democrat maintaining speed cameras, and then you show me a Republican... If you can...;)

...Or are you too chicken to accept the challenge?

I'll start:
Arizona Speed Cameras Expect $165 Million Annual Revenue

Not really interested since you already lost the debate. I never claimed that Democrats do not install those cameras.


By the way, trying to change the debate after you lost is a losing strategy as well.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
Not really interested since you already lost the debate. I never claimed that Democrats do not install those cameras.


By the way, trying to change the debate after you lost is a losing strategy as well.
images.jpeg-3.jpg
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
All it takes is one Democrat to initiate it.
Yeah, except it wasn't democrats. They were very rare breed in rural north central Indiana, and even rarer in power. This being the same state where in the other thread my biology teacher skipped teaching evolution because it went against her conservative christian beliefs.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
Nope, you made a positive assertion. Try again.

You might want to try to work on your logic skills just a tad. Do you need me to quote you where you doomed yourself?

No, you just want to make it harder for me, that way you can cheat yourself a victory. You want me to prove that every speed camera is a Democrat initiative, even though it would be much simpler to just find a Republican backed speed camera.

It's quite clear you value your agenda more than facts.
 
Top