• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

5 Little known but amazing scientific facts about Hinduism

Spirit_Warrior

Active Member
I was inspired by the thread religion adapting to scientific discoveries to start this thread. The idea that science and religion are mutually exclusive, which has its roots in Cartesian thought, is not something which occurs in Hinduism. In Hinduism science and religion compliment one another. It is the only religion that has its own systems of philosophy, the so-called 6 systems(sad-darsanas) and it the only religion that actually has science as a part of it -- like the science of politics economics(arthashastra) science of medicine(ayurveda) science of linguistics(vyakarana) --- and hundreds more. The Hindu scriptures teach that we need both material knowledge(apara vidya) and spiritual knowledge(paravidya) Hence, why science was cultivated by Hindus as a religious principle. Sounds strange, that doing science is actually a religious practice! Maybe that may explain why Hindus even today have a reputation for being patrons of science.

But there are some scientific facts and claims in Hinduism which are so staggering that are they are unbelievable, and yet completely true. I wanted to present just 5 examples of of these, which are taught as fully developed doctrine in Hinduism.

1. Evolution: Hinduism teaches that life evolves over billions of years of evolution from the first form of life produced by water and heat, over 8.4 million(they even quantify it, that's amazing) life forms. Remarkably, this number includes hundreds of thousands of humans living on other planets. It goes beyond humans though too, beyond humans are higher dimensional entities(gods basically) and beyond them is the creator lord(Brahma) The mechanism of this evolution is sort of like modern epigenetic theories, the life form reacts with its environment, and evolves those features that it needs to survive in the environment. However, it does not do this necessarily intelligently(so it is not intelligent design) its intelligence evolves too over a long time, it is more through a process of trial and error that these features -- or mutations appear.

There is some new research now that suggests that Darwin knew about Hindu theory of evolution, through Buddhist sources. Hindus also made attempts in zoology and botany science(another science that is a part of Hinduism) and enumerated thousands of types of plants and animals, long before origin of species was written.

2. Big bang: Hinduism teaches that the universe constantly expands and contracts, known as the doctrine of evolution and involution, represented with the metaphor of the life of Brahma. 100 years of the life of Brahma is the entire life span of the universe and that is 311.08 trillion years. In those 311 trillion years many universes form(brahmandas) and in those universes stars and planets form(surya mandala, pritvhi mandala), each with the life span of 8.64 billion years(1 day and night of Brahma). It describes that towards the end of that period(after 4.32 billion years) the sun starts to swallow the Earth, the sky turns red, the oceans boil away and the Earth can no longer support life. I mean seriously, where did they pull these numbers from accurate to two decimal places. This even impressed Carl Sagan, who noted they are staggeringly close to modern estimates.

Another startling revelation in Hinduism is the notion of an age of Manu(Manvantara) which lasts 306.72 million years, at the end of this all life on the planet is destroyed. It is taught we are 7th life on this planet, there have already been 6 mass extinctions of life on this planet. There will be 14 such Manus in the day phase of Brahma. The current Manu is called Vaishvata Manu.

It still gets more amazing. It describes the universe coming into being from nothing(well not exactly nothing, some sort of fuzzy state between existence and non-existence) which sounds like something from inflation and supersymmetry though. It says that in the beginning the three fundamental qualities of nature or the gunas are in a state of super-balance(meaning they have not yet diverged) The first one to break away is the guna responsible for activity, expansion(rajas). It causes the universe to expand rapidly, then the guna that is responsible for inertia, contraction acts against it, and the expansion slows down. The final guna, responsible for balance(sattva) acts on both to maintain harmony. In the end(after 311 trillion years) the gunas will resolve back into a state of super-balance and the universe will be destroyed. The cycle then repeats forever. This great cosmic cycle is mirrored at the atomic level, where every moment atoms are being created and destroyed. This atomic dance, is represented beautifully by dancing Shiva image(nataraja) and has been adopted by CERN which has a giant version outside of it.

3. Atoms: Hinduism teaches the existence of atoms as a matter of fact basis. I think it is the only religion(the other one being Jainism) that actually fully accepts doctrine of atoms. But this atomism is far far superior to the one of Democritus(some research shows that Democritus probably learned it in India, as there are Hellenic records of his contact with India -- who knows?) Hinduism teaches the classical doctrine of 5 elements as what matter is made of, but it is more sophisticated then the classical Greek version; the 5 elements range from subtle to gross, with the subtle part being atoms of the element. So fire for example is only the most gross version of the subtle fire atoms. The subtle atoms are characterised by the property they are responsible for --- so fire atoms give the property of colour(its a dead ringer for photons) and these atoms are infinitesimal, described as having point like dimension and imperceptible. Atomic aggregates gain magnitude not because of different size of atoms, but because of clusters of atoms. Akasha(often translated as ether) is the only element which is non-atomic, it is described as propagating through waves and it the most fundamental state of physical matter -- this is why Hindus believe it is in fact sound that creates all physical mater.(It is not sound in the audible sense, but the inaudible sound(pranava) that yogis claim to hear in meditation --- AUM


The most amazing part is even how atoms combine is described. The Greeks said atoms combine through random collisions, and they joint together through micro-nuts and bolts. In Hinduism atoms do not combine randomly, they combine according to precise laws. Primary atoms combine to form binary atoms, binary atoms to form trinary atoms and so on, until the most gross visible atom, motes of dust in a sun beam. So central are atoms in Hindu thought, that even classical Hindu measurements of time and space begin with the time and length of primary atoms, then binary and so on.

They combine though exchange of energy(doctrine of paka, means cooking) and the chemical properties of the compound change based on its atomic combinations. There are three types of reactions 1) where atomic bonds are broken and recombine to form new products 2) Where atoms bonds are not broken, but molecular changes take place. The third type of reaction is just a state change, where neither atomic bonds are broken or molecular changes take place, but the atoms gain or lose more fluidity to become either solid, liquid or gas.

It is wrongly thought that by some Indologists(like A L Basham) atomic theories of Hindus were just pure speculation that just happened to get it right(like epistemic luck) in fact they were based in empirical observation. The texts describe observations of say colour changes of how bricks change when heated, and then explain it terms of atomic and molecular changes. There are entire treatises written on chemistry(rasashatra) and lab equipment described, including chemical tests like flame tests to identify elements.

4. Gravity: Hinduism teaches the cause of falling to be Sanskrit "gurutva" literally translates to heaviness. Interestingly, the word gravity has the same etymology. In the Vaiseshika sutras, the laws of gravity and motion are stated in a matter of fact aphorisms. The most startling of these aphorisms(sutras) is the description of why an arrow follows a parabolic path. It goes something like this: The energy transferred from the bow to the arrow causes the arrow to course forward in proportion to the energy, this is reproduced at every moment causing its forward motion, the arrow would course forward forever were it not for gravity, the arrow gradually loses energy at every moment because gravity acts against it. The most startling revelation here is that motion is instantaneous not continuous. Later, this understanding was used by Brahmagupta to explain that things fall towards the centre of the planet Earth due to Earth's gravity, in order to explain why we don't fall of the Earth though it is spherical and spins on its axis. Later differential calculus to calculate the instantaneous motion of a body was developed by Bhaskara II (see Bhāskara II - Wikipedia) .

5. The equivalence of energy and matter: Many don't actually know this, but before Einstein published his theory of relativity, Tesla inspired by his meetings with the famous Hindu guru Swami Vivekananda who taught him the Samkhya philosophy(one of 6 schools of Hindu philosophy) tried to prove all energy and matter were equivalent. In an unpublished essay he tried to prove this using Sanskrit terms Akasha and Prana. Samkhya basically teaches that all matter, including light and energy manifests from a single substratum(moolaprakriti, means root matter) which is infinitely subtle, hence imperceptible, and remarkably it says at this level all matter is undifferentiated, non-dual and unified(avyukta) How matter goes from this level to the manifest level(where it is particular) is the subject of great debate in Samkhya and later Advaita philosophy. It is either a real change(parinam-vada) or an apparent change(vivarta-vada) In Samkhya the explanation will literally astound you: It is the observer that observes the root level of matter that causes the state to collapse into the manifest particular state(it also collapses the super-balance state of the gunas)

If you think this sounds like quantum physics, then you then are right. Just as many don't know Tesla's Hindu connection, many do not know that Schrodinger(considered the father of quantum mechanics) developed his theories after reading Samkhya. He was so convinced that Samkhya was true, that he wanted to give empirical and mathematical proofs of it -- his biographer confirms it. He converted to Hinduism, often used Sanskrit terms in his writings to describe concepts in quantum physics, kept a copy of the Bhagvad Gita on his bedside table and even named his cat Atman. It is even confirmed, that his famous Schrodinger's cat paradox(to show the absurdity of observer-collapse theory) was based on an old debate of the same observer paradox. Just as observer collapse is controversial today in quantum physics, it was controversial back then too, almost 2000 years ago. Schrodinger was not the only one, all the pioneers of quantum physics all made huge studies of Samkhya, including Heisenberg, Wigner and Bohm(who sided with apparent change doctrine of Advaita, and even had an Advaita mentor, the illustrious Krishnamurthy)


I would like to add some words of caution. We cannot overstate that Hinduism is all science, what I have presented above is a distilled version to extract only the scientific part. In Hinduism science, spirituality, mythology, history, ritual, art all are mixed with each other.
 
Last edited:

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
I was inspired by the thread religion adapting to scientific discoveries to start this thread. The idea that science and religion are mutually exclusive, which has its roots in Cartesian thought, is not something which occurs in Hinduism. In Hinduism science and religion compliment one another. It is the only religion that has its own systems of philosophy, the so-called 6 systems(sad-darsanas) and it the only religion that actually has science as a part of it -- like the science of politics economics(arthashastra) science of medicine(ayurveda) science of linguistics(vyakarana) --- and hundreds more. The Hindu scriptures teach that we need both material knowledge(apara vidya) and spiritual knowledge(paravidya) Hence, why science was cultivated by Hindus as a religious principle. Sounds strange, that doing science is actually a religious practice! Maybe that may explain why Hindus even today have a reputation for being patrons of science.

But there are some scientific facts and claims in Hinduism which are so staggering that are they are unbelievable, and yet completely true. I wanted to present just 5 examples of of these, which are taught as fully developed doctrine in Hinduism.

1. Evolution: Hinduism teaches that life evolves over billions of years of evolution from the first form of life produced by water and heat, over 8.4 million(they even quantify it, that's amazing) life forms. Remarkably, this number includes hundreds of thousands of humans living on other planets. It goes beyond humans though too, beyond humans are higher dimensional entities(gods basically) and beyond them is the creator lord(Brahma) The mechanism of this evolution is sort of like modern epigenetic theories, the life form reacts with its environment, and evolves those features that it needs to survive in the environment. However, it does not do this necessarily intelligently(so it is not intelligent design) its intelligence evolves too over a long time, it is more through a process of trial and error that these features -- or mutations appear.

There is some new research now that suggests that Darwin knew about Hindu theory of evolution, through Buddhist sources. Hindus also made attempts in zoology and botany science(another science that is a part of Hinduism) and enumerated thousands of types of plants and animals, long before origin of species was written.

2. Big bang: Hinduism teaches that the universe constantly expands and contracts, known as the doctrine of evolution and involution, represented with the metaphor of the life of Brahma. 100 years of the life of Brahma is the entire life span of the universe and that is 311.08 trillion years. In those 311 trillion years many universes form(brahmandas) and in those universes stars and planets form(surya mandala, pritvhi mandala), each with the life span of 8.64 billion years(1 day and night of Brahma). It describes that towards the end of that period(after 4.32 billion years) the sun starts to swallow the Earth, the sky turns red, the oceans boil away and the Earth can no longer support life. I mean seriously, where did they pull these numbers from accurate to two decimal places. This even impressed Carl Sagan, who noted they are staggeringly close to modern estimates.

Another startling revelation in Hinduism is the notion of an age of Manu(Manvantara) which lasts 306.72 million years, at the end of this all life on the planet is destroyed. It is taught we are 7th life on this planet, there have already been 6 mass extinctions of life on this planet. There will be 14 such Manus in the day phase of Brahma. The current Manu is called Vaishvata Manu.

It still gets more amazing. It describes the universe coming into being from nothing(well not exactly nothing, some sort of fuzzy state between existence and non-existence) which sounds like something from inflation and supersymmetry though. It says that in the beginning the three fundamental qualities of nature or the gunas are in a state of super-balance(meaning they have not yet diverged) The first one to break away is the guna responsible for activity, expansion(rajas). It causes the universe to expand rapidly, then the guna that is responsible for inertia, contraction acts against it, and the expansion slows down. The final guna, responsible for balance(sattva) acts on both to maintain harmony. In the end(after 311 trillion years) the gunas will resolve back into a state of super-balance and the universe will be destroyed. The cycle then repeats forever. This great cosmic cycle is mirrored at the atomic level, where every moment atoms are being created and destroyed. This atomic dance, is represented beautifully by dancing Shiva image(nataraja) and has been adopted by CERN which has a giant version outside of it.

3. Atoms: Hinduism teaches the existence of atoms as a matter of fact basis. I think it is the only religion(the other one being Jainism) that actually fully accepts doctrine of atoms. But this atomism is far far superior to the one of Democritus(some research shows that Democritus probably learned it in India, as there are Hellenic records of his contact with India -- who knows?) Hinduism teaches the classical doctrine of 5 elements as what matter is made of, but it is more sophisticated then the classical Greek version; the 5 elements range from subtle to gross, with the subtle part being atoms of the element. So fire for example is only the most gross version of the subtle fire atoms. The subtle atoms are characterised by the property they are responsible for --- so fire atoms give the property of colour(its a dead ringer for photons) and these atoms are infinitesimal, described as having point like dimension and imperceptible. Atomic aggregates gain magnitude not because of different size of atoms, but because of clusters of atoms. Akasha(often translated as ether) is the only element which is non-atomic, it is described as propagating through waves and it the most fundamental state of physical matter -- this is why Hindus believe it is in fact sound that creates all physical mater.(It is not sound in the audible sense, but the inaudible sound(pranava) that yogis claim to hear in meditation --- AUM


The most amazing part is even how atoms combine is described. The Greeks said atoms combine through random collisions, and they joint together through micro-nuts and bolts. In Hinduism atoms do not combine randomly, they combine according to precise laws. Primary atoms combine to form binary atoms, binary atoms to form trinary atoms and so on, until the most gross visible atom, motes of dust in a sun beam. So central are atoms in Hindu thought, that even classical Hindu measurements of time and space begin with the time and length of primary atoms, then binary and so on.

They combine though exchange of energy(doctrine of paka, means cooking) and the chemical properties of the compound change based on its atomic combinations. There are three types of reactions 1) where atomic bonds are broken and recombine to form new products 2) Where atoms bonds are not broken, but molecular changes take place. The third type of reaction is just a state change, where neither atomic bonds are broken or molecular changes take place, but the atoms gain or lose more fluidity to become either solid, liquid or gas.

It is wrongly thought that by some Indologists(like A L Basham) atomic theories of Hindus were just pure speculation that just happened to get it right(like epistemic luck) in fact they were based in empirical observation. The texts describe observations of say colour changes of how bricks change when heated, and then explain it terms of atomic and molecular changes. There are entire treatises written on chemistry(rasashatra) and lab equipment described, including chemical tests like flame tests to identify elements.

4. Gravity: Hinduism teaches the cause of falling to be Sanskrit "gurutva" literally translates to heaviness. Interestingly, the word gravity has the same etymology. In the Vaiseshika sutras, the laws of gravity and motion are stated in a matter of fact aphorisms. The most startling of these aphorisms(sutras) is the description of why an arrow follows a parabolic path. It goes something like this: The energy transferred from the bow to the arrow causes the arrow to course forward in proportion to the energy, this is reproduced at every moment causing its forward motion, the arrow would course forward forever were it not for gravity, the arrow gradually loses energy at every moment because gravity acts against it. The most startling revelation here is that motion is instantaneous not continuous. Later, this understanding was used by Brahmagupta to explain that things fall towards the centre of the planet Earth due to Earth's gravity, in order to explain why we don't fall of the Earth though it is spherical and spins on its axis. Later differential calculus to calculate the instantaneous motion of a body was developed by Bhaskara II (see Bhāskara II - Wikipedia) .

5. The equivalence of energy and matter: Many don't actually know this, but before Einstein published his theory of relativity, Tesla inspired by his meetings with the famous Hindu guru Swami Vivekananda who taught him the Samkhya philosophy(one of 6 schools of Hindu philosophy) tried to prove all energy and matter were equivalent. In an unpublished essay he tried to prove this using Sanskrit terms Akasha and Prana. Samkhya basically teaches that all matter, including light and energy manifests from a single substratum(moolaprakriti, means root matter) which is infinitely subtle, hence imperceptible, and remarkably it says at this level all matter is undifferentiated, non-dual and unified(avyukta) How matter goes from this level to the manifest level(where it is particular) is the subject of great debate in Samkhya and later Advaita philosophy. It is either a real change(parinam-vada) or an apparent change(vivarta-vada) In Samkhya the explanation will literally astound you: It is the observer that observes the root level of matter that causes the state to collapse into the manifest particular state(it also collapses the super-balance state of the gunas)

If you think this sounds like quantum physics, then you then are right. Just as many don't know Tesla's Hindu connection, many do not know that Schrodinger(considered the father of quantum mechanics) developed his theories after reading Samkhya. He was so convinced that Samkhya was true, that he wanted to give empirical and mathematical proofs of it -- his biographer confirms it. He converted to Hinduism, often used Sanskrit terms in his writings to describe concepts in quantum physics, kept a copy of the Bhagvad Gita on his bedside table and even named his cat Atman. It is even confirmed, that his famous Schrodinger's cat paradox(to show the absurdity of observer-collapse theory) was based on an old debate of the same observer paradox. Just as observer collapse is controversial today in quantum physics, it was controversial back then too, almost 2000 years ago. Schrodinger was not the only one, all the pioneers of quantum physics all made huge studies of Samkhya, including Heisenberg, Wigner and Bohm(who sided with apparent change doctrine of Advaita, and even had an Advaita mentor, the illustrious Krishnamurthy)


I would like to add some words of caution. We cannot overstate that Hinduism is all science, what I have presented above is a distilled version to extract only the scientific part. In Hinduism science, spirituality, mythology, history, ritual, art all are mixed with each other.

Without supporting scientific papers and references, you don't have anything here to talk about.
 

Spirit_Warrior

Active Member
Without supporting scientific papers and references, you don't have anything here to talk about.

Sorry I did not post references, my aim was not to prove anything, but just mention some interesting and rather well known doctrines within Hinduism and those who study the religion, doctrines which correspond strongly to modern scientific facts. When I say doctrines, I mean fully formulated systems of thought, and not just some wishfully interpreted words in some scripture. You will read about these doctrines throughout Hindu scriptures, stated in a matter of fact basis, even taken for granted. However, you asked for references, so I thought I would provide some for some of the statements I made. These are just quick references I am finding with google searches and include articles and blog entries along with some scholarly papers, just enough to give you a basic idea. To get into more detail you will need further reading, and I will recommend some books at the end if you are interested in doing that.

1. Evolution

Natural Evolution According to Hinduism
Hinduism and Human Evolution
Evolution; Not as Recent as You Might Think!
Decode Hindu Mythology: Evolution in Hinduism
Dashavatara - Wikipedia

Evolution is ubiquitous not only in Hinduism, but in Dharmic religions, literally taken for granted as a matter of fact. Modern census shows about 80% of Hindus believe in evolution:

Even the belief of traditional tens incarnations on of Vishnu(dash avatara) on Earth from the beginning today follow an evolutionary path. First incarnation is fish, second is turtle, third is boar, fourth is half man half lion, firth is dwarf, 6th is man with axe, 7th is virtuous man Lord Rama, 8th is Krishna or intelligent man, 9th is Buddha or spiritual man, and the 10th which is yet to come is machine-man.

Many evolutionist scientists and early scholars have commented on Hindu evolution ideas. Such as:

Sir John Woodroffe (1865-1936)

“Ages before Lamarck and Darwin, it was held in India that man has passsed through 84 lakhs births as plants, animals, inferior species and then came the ancestors of developed man existing today. The theory was an act of brilliant deduction in which observation may also have had played part

"The Hindus were Spinozas 2,000 years before the birth of Spinoza, Darwinians centuries before the birth of Darwin, and evolutionists many centuries before the doctrine of evolution had been accepted by the Huxleys of our time, and before any word like 'evolution' existed in any language of the world."

So wrote Sir M. Monier-Williams, Professor of Sanskrit, Oxford University, 1894 (source: M.L. Burke, Swami Vivekenanda in the West, Vol II, 3rd edition, p128, 1984). "

In the Vishnu Purana the 8.4 million life forms(84 lakhs) are enumerated as

"20,000 species of non-mobile plants etc. Sthavara); 900,000 species of aquatic creatures; 900,000 species of amphibian and reptiles, 1,000,000 species of birds, etc.; 3,000,000 species of other creatures such as animals, etc.; 400,000 species of anthropoids (Vanaras), after which the human species (Manushya) of 200,000 varieties come into being, and Man then engages in purposeful activity to attain perfection."

To us Hindus, even from a spiritual point of view, we take evolution for granted. We are told in all Hindu scriptures of how rare and special a human birth is to get, because we only attain it after going through millions and millions of births of lower animal species, starting all the way from a protoplasm over billions of years. So we are cautioned not to waste this great opportunity. We also believe it is possible to devolve and revert back to lower animal species based on bad karma in this life. There is a lot of debate on this though, some believe you can never go back because the quality of human karmas will only lead to further human births, but others say particularly sinful karma could lead to nature providing a lower animal body in order to work those karmas out e.g. a murderer could be born in a tigers body.

In Ayurveda texts it even describes, what is basically the hereditary theory of Mendel, the embroyo inherits its characteristics from its parents ovum and sperm, which contain the specific information that develops its features, some come from the ovum and some sperm. The information contained in an animals parents is specific, so animal parents cannot produce another species. The text even describes homosexuality as being the result of mutations in the information from the ovum and sperm i.e. genetic mutations. If you want a citation directly from the text, I will find it for you, this is only to give you an idea of how taken for granted evolution is in Hinduism.

2. Big Bang

Journal of Cosmology
Untitled
Hindu cosmology - Wikipedia


ttime.jpg


In his classic, Cosmos, Carl Sagan describes Hinduism’s agreement with modern science:

"The Hindu religion is the only one of the world's great faiths dedicated to the idea that the Cosmos itself undergoes an immense, indeed an infinite, number of deaths and rebirths. It is the only religion in which time scales correspond to those of modern scientific cosmology. Its cycles run from our ordinary day and night to a day and night of Brahma, 8.64 billion years long, longer than the age of the Earth or the Sun and about half the time since the Big Bang.”

The theory of evolution and involution based on gunas breaking out of balance:

The Triple Gunas, Sattva, Rajas and Tamas
Guṇa - Wikipedia
Philosophy Sankhya

3. Atoms

Atomism - Wikipedia
Vyesheshika Darsana
The atomic theory of the ancient Hindus
The Indian Sage who developed Atomic Theory 2,600 years ago
Creation, God and Atoms - Sanskriti - Indian Culture

In Hinduism atoms are described in all the major Hindu scriptures, and in Jainism atoms are formally studied as part of religious practice(as one of the 7 elements of existence) In Hinduism atoms occur more explicitly in the Vaiseshika school, in which they are described in greater detail, including how they combine, their shape, their mass, size. Later, when Vaiseshika combined with Nyaya, God's will was postulated as the one who arranges the atoms to form the objects of the world:

Some scriptures which mention atoms, include Srimad Bhagvat Puranam:

Atomic theory from Bhagvatgita

The five elements in their gross and subtle atomic forms and how they combine

https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0701/0701077.pdf
PANCHABUTA or FIVE ELEMENTS by Dr. Gautam Chatterjee
 
Last edited:

Spirit_Warrior

Active Member
4. Gravity

Analytic Philosophy in Early Modern India (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Although the earliest texts that mention gravity by name are found in 600BCE, the idea of gravity is also alluded to in older scriptures, which say "The sun holds all the planets in its orbit like pearls on a necklace" the sun is called "guru" which also means the most heaviest. However, as a fully developed doctrine it appears only in the Vaiseshika school. John Adams, second president of America who studied the Vaiseshika, stated this:

He wrote to Jefferson in 1817 that his respect for ancient Indian civilization had increased:

We find that Materialists and Immaterialists existed in India and that they accused each other of Atheism, before Berkly or Priestley, or Dupuis, or Plato, or Pythagoras were born. Indeed Neuton himself, appears to have discovered nothing that was not known to the Antient Indians. He has only furnished more ample demonstrations of the doctrines they taught. (quoted in Jackson 31)

Adams was impressed.9 He insisted that his religious loyalties had not been affected by his study of Hinduism, but he was excited by the discovery of philosophical sophistication to rival if not to exceed that of the West.Source: Unitarianism and early American interest in Hinduism - Christopher L. Walton


5, Equivalence of energy and matter

The unpublished essay of Tesla trying to prove the equivalence of energy and matter with reference to Samkhya philosophy and using Sanskrit terms:

Nikola Tesla and Swami Vivekananda

The strong Hindu influences on Schrodinger and other quantum physicists: Quotes from the men themselves:

“The multiplicity is only apparent. This is the doctrine of the Upanishads. And not of the Upanishads only. The mystical experience of the union with God regularly leads to this view, unless strong prejudices stand in the West.” (Erwin Schrödinger, What is Life?, p. 129, Cambridge University Press)

“There is no kind of framework within which we can find consciousness in the plural; this is simply something we construct because of the temporal plurality of individuals, but it is a false construction… The only solution to this conflict insofar as any is available to us at all lies in the ancient wisdom of the Upanishad.” (Mein Leben, Meine Weltansicht [My Life, My World View] (1961), Chapter 4)

In his biography on Schrödinger, Moore wrote: “His system – or that of the Upanishads – is delightful and consistent: the self and the world are one and they are all… He rejected traditional western religious beliefs (Jewish, Christian, and Islamic) not on the basis of any reasoned argument, nor even with an expression of emotional antipathy, for he loved to use religious expressions and metaphors, but simply by saying that they are naive. Vedanta and gnosticism are beliefs likely to appeal to a mathematical physicist, a brilliant only child, tempted on occasion by intellectual pride. Such factors may help to explain why Schrödinger became a believer in Vedanta, but they do not detract from the importance of his belief as a foundation for his life and work. It would be simplistic to suggest that there is a direct causal link between his religious beliefs and his discoveries in theoretical physics, yet the unity and continuity of Vedanta are reflected in the unity and continuity of wave mechanics. In 1925, the world view of physics was a model of the universe as a great machine composed of separable interacting material particles, During the next few years, Schrödinger and Heisenberg and their followers created a universe based on superimposed inseparable waves of probability amplitudes. This new view would be entirely consistent with the vedantic concept of the All in One.” (Schrödinger: Life and Thought (Meine Weltansicht), p. 173)

Fritjof Capra, when interviewed by Renee Weber in the book The Holographic Paradigm (page 217–218), stated that Schrödinger, in speaking about Heisenberg, has said:

“I had several discussions with Heisenberg. I lived in England then [circa 1972], and I visited him several times in Munich and showed him the whole manuscript chapter by chapter. He was very interested and very open, and he told me something that I think is not known publicly because he never published it. He said that he was well aware of these parallels. While he was working on quantum theory he went to India to lecture and was a guest of Tagore. He talked a lot with Tagore about Indian philosophy. Heisenberg told me that these talks had helped him a lot with his work in physics, because they showed him that all these new ideas in quantum physics were in fact not all that crazy. He realized there was, in fact, a whole culture that subscribed to very similar ideas. Heisenberg said that this was a great help for him. Niels Bohr had a similar experience when he went to China.”

Schrodinger's cat was a reformulated Samkhya observer paradox

Development of Quantum Mechanics

Excerpt:

You may recall the Schrödinger's Cat paradox, which was first published in its "scientific form" in 1935 in Zeitschrift der Physick. However in his 1925 essay he recounts an ancient Sankhya Hindu paradox that, jazzed up with some technology, became the cat paradox. In that original form the paradox was cast in the form of two people, one looking at a garden, the other in a dark room. The modern equivalent would be one person looking in the box to see if the cat is alive or dead, while a second person waits out in the hall. As we discussed, in this modern form the state "collapses" for the first person while it does not collapse for the second person.

In 1925 Schrõdinger resolved that paradox the way the Vedantists did: he asserted that all consciousness is one. As he wrote:

"But it is quite easy to express the solution in words, thus: the plurality [of viewpoints] that we perceive is only "an appearance; it is not real. Vedantic philosophy, in which this is a fundamental dogma, has sought to clarify it by a number of analogies, one of the most attractive being the many-faceted crystal which, while showing hundreds of little pictures of what is in reality a single existent object, does not really multiply the object."

Further reading:

These are considered very reliable sources, and used as main reference guides in major universities for Indian philosophy and Hindu studies.

Positive Sciences of the Hindus, by Sir Brijendra Nath Seal: The Positive Sciences Of The Ancient Hindus : Seal, Brajendranath, Sir, 1864-1938 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
History of Hindu Chemistry, by P.C Ray: A history of Hindu chemistry from the earliest times to the middle of the sixteenth century, A.D. : with Sanskrit texts, variants, translation and illustrations : Ray, Prafulla Chandra, 1861-1944 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

I hope the references were helpful and inspire you for further research.
 
Last edited:

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
4. Gravity

Analytic Philosophy in Early Modern India (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Although the earliest texts that mention gravity by name are found in 600BCE, the idea of gravity is also alluded to in older scriptures, which say "The sun holds all the planets in its orbit like pearls on a necklace" the sun is called "guru" which also means the most heaviest. However, as a fully developed doctrine it appears only in the Vaiseshika school. John Adams, second president of America who studied the Vaiseshika, stated this:

He wrote to Jefferson in 1817 that his respect for ancient Indian civilization had increased:

We find that Materialists and Immaterialists existed in India and that they accused each other of Atheism, before Berkly or Priestley, or Dupuis, or Plato, or Pythagoras were born. Indeed Neuton himself, appears to have discovered nothing that was not known to the Antient Indians. He has only furnished more ample demonstrations of the doctrines they taught. (quoted in Jackson 31)

Adams was impressed.9 He insisted that his religious loyalties had not been affected by his study of Hinduism, but he was excited by the discovery of philosophical sophistication to rival if not to exceed that of the West.Source: Unitarianism and early American interest in Hinduism - Christopher L. Walton


5, Equivalence of energy and matter

The unpublished essay of Tesla trying to prove the equivalence of energy and matter with reference to Samkhya philosophy and using Sanskrit terms:

Nikola Tesla and Swami Vivekananda

The strong Hindu influences on Schrodinger and other quantum physicists: Quotes from the men themselves:

“The multiplicity is only apparent. This is the doctrine of the Upanishads. And not of the Upanishads only. The mystical experience of the union with God regularly leads to this view, unless strong prejudices stand in the West.” (Erwin Schrödinger, What is Life?, p. 129, Cambridge University Press)

“There is no kind of framework within which we can find consciousness in the plural; this is simply something we construct because of the temporal plurality of individuals, but it is a false construction… The only solution to this conflict insofar as any is available to us at all lies in the ancient wisdom of the Upanishad.” (Mein Leben, Meine Weltansicht [My Life, My World View] (1961), Chapter 4)

In his biography on Schrödinger, Moore wrote: “His system – or that of the Upanishads – is delightful and consistent: the self and the world are one and they are all… He rejected traditional western religious beliefs (Jewish, Christian, and Islamic) not on the basis of any reasoned argument, nor even with an expression of emotional antipathy, for he loved to use religious expressions and metaphors, but simply by saying that they are naive. Vedanta and gnosticism are beliefs likely to appeal to a mathematical physicist, a brilliant only child, tempted on occasion by intellectual pride. Such factors may help to explain why Schrödinger became a believer in Vedanta, but they do not detract from the importance of his belief as a foundation for his life and work. It would be simplistic to suggest that there is a direct causal link between his religious beliefs and his discoveries in theoretical physics, yet the unity and continuity of Vedanta are reflected in the unity and continuity of wave mechanics. In 1925, the world view of physics was a model of the universe as a great machine composed of separable interacting material particles, During the next few years, Schrödinger and Heisenberg and their followers created a universe based on superimposed inseparable waves of probability amplitudes. This new view would be entirely consistent with the vedantic concept of the All in One.” (Schrödinger: Life and Thought (Meine Weltansicht), p. 173)

Fritjof Capra, when interviewed by Renee Weber in the book The Holographic Paradigm (page 217–218), stated that Schrödinger, in speaking about Heisenberg, has said:

“I had several discussions with Heisenberg. I lived in England then [circa 1972], and I visited him several times in Munich and showed him the whole manuscript chapter by chapter. He was very interested and very open, and he told me something that I think is not known publicly because he never published it. He said that he was well aware of these parallels. While he was working on quantum theory he went to India to lecture and was a guest of Tagore. He talked a lot with Tagore about Indian philosophy. Heisenberg told me that these talks had helped him a lot with his work in physics, because they showed him that all these new ideas in quantum physics were in fact not all that crazy. He realized there was, in fact, a whole culture that subscribed to very similar ideas. Heisenberg said that this was a great help for him. Niels Bohr had a similar experience when he went to China.”

Schrodinger's cat was a reformulated Samkhya observer paradox

Development of Quantum Mechanics

Excerpt:

You may recall the Schrödinger's Cat paradox, which was first published in its "scientific form" in 1935 in Zeitschrift der Physick. However in his 1925 essay he recounts an ancient Sankhya Hindu paradox that, jazzed up with some technology, became the cat paradox. In that original form the paradox was cast in the form of two people, one looking at a garden, the other in a dark room. The modern equivalent would be one person looking in the box to see if the cat is alive or dead, while a second person waits out in the hall. As we discussed, in this modern form the state "collapses" for the first person while it does not collapse for the second person.

In 1925 Schrõdinger resolved that paradox the way the Vedantists did: he asserted that all consciousness is one. As he wrote:

"But it is quite easy to express the solution in words, thus: the plurality [of viewpoints] that we perceive is only "an appearance; it is not real. Vedantic philosophy, in which this is a fundamental dogma, has sought to clarify it by a number of analogies, one of the most attractive being the many-faceted crystal which, while showing hundreds of little pictures of what is in reality a single existent object, does not really multiply the object."

Further reading:

These are considered very reliable sources, and used as main reference guides in major universities for Indian philosophy and Hindu studies.

Positive Sciences of the Hindus, by Sir Brijendra Nath Seal: The Positive Sciences Of The Ancient Hindus : Seal, Brajendranath, Sir, 1864-1938 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
History of Hindu Chemistry, by P.C Ray: A history of Hindu chemistry from the earliest times to the middle of the sixteenth century, A.D. : with Sanskrit texts, variants, translation and illustrations : Ray, Prafulla Chandra, 1861-1944 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

I hope the references were helpful and inspire you for further research.

I appreciate you efforts in compiling this long post including the links. This is not quite what was after, however.

I was looking for references that showed that the writers of your religious texts actually KNEW what an atom was. Can you point me to where they describe electrons, neutrons, protons, and electrons in an unambiguous manner? Can you show me where they actually understood how the electrical charges of the particles held things together?

You will have to provide very strong evidence that people living before 600 BCE even knew that other planets existed. I do not think that is the case.

Contrary to your claim, gravity does not drain or absorb energy from a flying arrow. it's fall is slowed by loss of energy through the friction of the surrounding air. Gravity is nothing more than the effect of the curvature of space-time by mass.

My point is, you are blinded by your own confirmation bias and are using vague descriptions and concepts to try and justify a detailed scientific knowledge that was not there.
 

Spirit_Warrior

Active Member
I appreciate you efforts in compiling this long post including the links. This is not quite what was after, however.

I was looking for references that showed that the writers of your religious texts actually KNEW what an atom was. Can you point me to where they describe electrons, neutrons, protons, and electrons in an unambiguous manner? Can you show me where they actually understood how the electrical charges of the particles held things together?

You will have to provide very strong evidence that people living before 600 BCE even knew that other planets existed. I do not think that is the case.

Contrary to your claim, gravity does not drain or absorb energy from a flying arrow. it's fall is slowed by loss of energy through the friction of the surrounding air. Gravity is nothing more than the effect of the curvature of space-time by mass.

My point is, you are blinded by your own confirmation bias and are using vague descriptions and concepts to try and justify a detailed scientific knowledge that was not there.

I think all your doubts will be resolved if you actually read the links I have provided. You still maintain that they did not know what an atom was, when it is clear from the links I provide they postulated atoms. Did they postulate protons, neutrons and protons by name? Did they describe and quantify their mass, size, charge? No, of course not. As those are technical empirical questions which can only be determined by measuring using instruments, which requires modern technology --- however did they infer they existed? Yes they did. They inferred they existed based on arguments that account for the difference in size and magnitude of objects e.g. here is the traditional Vaiseshika arguments:

If matter is infinitely divisible, then it would be possible to infinitely divide a mustard seed and a mountain, and then from the infinite parts of the mustard seed to build a mountain. However, this is absurd, because one begins with a mustard seed and ends up with a mountain. Therefore, matter is not infinitely divisible, but there is a unit of matter which is not-divisible, this indivisible unit is the atom --- that which cannot be divided further.

Then further inferences are given for why primary atoms are imperceptible -- primary atoms have no magnitude because they are point-size in dimension, binary atoms are formed when two primary atoms combine, and trinary atoms are created when three binary atoms atoms combine, and trinary atoms are the first atoms to have magnitude. All atomic composites are based on various combinations and permutations of these primary atoms. The primary atoms of Hinduism are neither protons, electrons or neutrons, nor quarks, they are extremely subtle atoms which have absolutely no size, no mass, no dimension, but their aggregates have size, mass, dimension. Even the smallest building block of modern physics does not correspond with them, because they have size etc

As for how atoms combine. I already stated it is believed atoms combine through precise laws of nature. Various speculations are given by the Hindu philosophers for how they combine. I mentioned three of them and if you consult the sources I gave for further reading, they will mention in greater detail. The most prominent theory is that they combine through application of energy, based on observation of the changes of chemical properties of things when heat is supplied etc. This can be external heat supplied by fire, light etc, or it can be internal heat generated within the substance itself. There are two ways in which they believe the atoms are affected -- either all the atoms are broken down down to their primary atoms, and then combine to new substances --- or only upper-level atomic bonds are broken, like only molecular changes. They realised that not all reactions involved breaking something down to its primary atoms, because if that was the case if you heat the pot, the entire pot would just dissolve into particles, and not just change colour, thus some reactions were just chemical reactions and reactions where they were completely broken down were atomic reactions.

Regarding electron valency theory. The Jains actually came up with the theory that atoms combine only when they have opposite touch potential(which is the modern equivalent of charge) touch can be either smooth or rough. If an atom has 6 rough units and another atom has 8 smooth units, the two will combine. They will not combine if it has 6 rough units and 6 smooth units.

The primary atoms are eternal, and composite-atoms are non eternal because they are combinations of primary atoms. Primary atoms are responsible for all sensible properties like touch, colour, taste and smell e.g. If something has a red colour, the theory says that there is a primary atom in that substance that is responsible for the red colour -- primary fire atom.

It is irrelevant how the Hindus or the Jains were able to arrive at their understanding of atoms, whether through observation, inference or supernatural perception, my original claim was merely that the atomic doctrine is a core part of Hinduism. It is taken for granted to exist in Hindu scriptures as well, I even linked you one. Just as the other doctrines I mentioned like evolution etc. You clearly did not click on this link:

aramaH sad-visheShANAm aneko .asaMyutaH sadA |
paramANuH sa viGYeyo nR^iNAm aikya bhramo yataH || 3.11.1

The material manifestation’s ultimate particle, which is indivisible and not formed into a body, is called the atom. It exists always as an invisible identity, even after the dissolution of all forms. The material body is but a combination of such atoms, but it is misunderstood by the common man.

sata eva padArthasya svarUpAvasthitasya yat |
kaivalyaM parama-mahAn avisheSho nirantaraH | |3.11.2

Atoms are the ultimate state of the manifest universe. When they stay in their own forms without forming different bodies, they are called the unlimited oneness. There are certainly different bodies in physical forms, but the atoms themselves form the complete manifestation.
.
evaM kAlo .apy anumitaH saukShmye sthaulye ca sattama |
saMsthAna-bhuktyA bhagavAn avyakto vyakta-bhug vibhuH || 3.11.3

In the same way time also has its discrete divisions, which comprise its gross form and this can be measured by the movement and combination of particles; viShNu is that which is unmanifest, existing in movement and in potential.

sa kAlaH paramANur vai yo bhu~nkte paramANutAm |
sato .avisheSha-bhug yas tu sa kAlaH paramo mahAn || 3.11.4

Those discrete units of time, which are verily further indivisible, correspond to the time required by a paramANu to cover the space equivalent to a paramANu; this is verily the primal, supreme time.

aNur dvau paramANU syAt trasareNus trayaH smRtaH |
jAlArka-rashmy-avagataH kham evAnupatan agAt || 3.11.5

Two paramANus are combine to form an aNu, and 3 combine to form a trasareNu; the rays of light emerging from a mesh can make these [trasareNus] move up in empty space.

Contrary to your claim, gravity does not drain or absorb energy from a flying arrow. it's fall is slowed by loss of energy through the friction of the surrounding air. Gravity is nothing more than the effect of the curvature of space-time by mass.

That is not the claim. I never said, and nor does the link I posted this is by the way by a scientist delivering a presentation at the Indian institute of technology, arranged by MIT. It says the arrow falls due to gravity, when it loses momentum energy. The original momentum energy is provided by the bow to the arrow, the arrow courses forward at a velocity proportional to the momentum energy, as it travels forward it loses kinetic energy at every successive steps, if shot upwards its kinetic energy becomes 0 at its maximum height. Have studied pure mechanics myself in earlier life and I know about force vectors. The horizontal component is the original momentum energy provided by the bow and the vertical component is gravity acting down on it.
 
Last edited:

Spirit_Warrior

Active Member
Re atoms and gravity etc, I thought I would actually cite the original primary texts of the natural philosophy or physics school of Hinduism I already mentioned(Vaiseshika) which is dated about 600BCE by most scholars. I will also mention the classical commentaries given by Vaiseshika philosophers in the early medieval age.


5.7. In the absence of conjunction, falling (results) from gravity. 187

By the term, conjunction, every kind of impediment is indicated.
Hence in the absence of impediments, in consequence of gravity as its
non-combinative cause, falling i. e., an action resulting in conjunction
below, is produced. Here in fruit, etc., possessing gravity, the impedi
ment is conjunction ; in a bird, etc., however, volition to hold up is the
impediment to falling ; in an arrow, etc., when discharged, it is the re
action that is the impediment to falling. The meaning is that, in the
absence of these, falling is caused by gravity.
.
e.g. the fruit is held up by the branch on the tree, but when the conjunction
with the branch is gone, it falls due to gravity. Likewise, the bird is held
up by the volition of the bird, and the arrow by its propulsive energy, in
absence of both, both fall due to gravity.


5.8. Owing to the absence of a particular unit movement,
there arises no upward or sideward motion (in the fruit, bird, and
arrow). 188.

The upward or sideward motion which takes place in a stone, arrow,
etc., though they possess gravity, results from a particular i. ., a
violent, unit movement. So that in the case of the falling of a
fruit, a bird, an arrow, etc., in the absence of conjunction, volition,
and re-action, there does not exist a particular movement, and conse
quently there is no upward or sideward motion. This is the sense. 8.

5.9. Particular unit movement (results) from particular
volition. 189.

Particular volition is caused by the desire "I will throw sideward r
upward, far, or near." By this, particular nodana or paricular impulse
is produced, from which upward or sideward motion is possible
produced in a substance possessing gravity

e.g. A specific amount of unit movement s produced by specific effort
in words momentum is proportional to force applied. If I throw something
with less force, it travels less distance.

Now with this understood, lets jump directly to the description of the arrow

5.16. Peculiarities of non-simultaneous conjunctions of the
arrow, are the mark of the diversity of its action. 195

Note. The language is technical, but because it is saying that the arrow has different levels of energy on its path leading to it being at different heights and distances(i.e. its parabolic path) means that there are multiple forces acting on the objects in different directions. In this case the horizontal force and the vertical force. You will see that the next big natural philosopher in this school, comes up with a far more technical description of force, identified that all forces have direction and each force cannot affect each other, but act simultaneously on the object.

5. 17. The first action of the arrow is from impulse ; the next
is from resultant energy produced by that (i.e., the first) action ;
and similarly the next, and the next. 197.

Of the first action, which is produced in an arrow, when discharged
from a bowstring, drawn by the volition of a person, the arrow is the
combinative cause, volition and gravity are the efficient causes. And
by this first action, resultant energy, called impetus, and having the
same substratum, is produced, it is proved even by perception, viz.,
"It (i. e., the arrow) moves with velocity"; By that resultant energy,
action is produced in that arrow ; of which the non-combinative cause
is the resultant energy, the combinative cause is the arrow, while the
efficient cause is an intense form of unit movement. In like man
ner, a succession of actions one after another is produced by the
resultant energy which continues until the arrow falls.
Since, on an action being destroyed by subsequent conjunction
produced by (the action) itself, another action is produced by resultant
energy, therefore, a single resultant energy only is productive of a
succession of actions ; whereas, on the ground of redundancy, it is not
proper to assume a succession of resultant energy, similar to the
succession of actions. To point out this, he says "similarly the next,
and the next" and also uses the singular number in "from resultant
energy produced by that action" In the Nyaya doctrine, however,
which admits a succession of resultant energies like the succession of
actions, there is redundancy. The reason, again, that of two arrows,
simultaneously discharged, the impetus of the one is swift and that of
the other slow, is the swiftness and slownees of the impulse or unit
movement.

Vivrtti. The original action itself of a discharged arrow, etc.,
destroys, at the third moment from its own origin, its cause, viz.t
unit movement or impulse, given by the bow. Therefore, there
being absence of impulse, how will other actions be produced at the
fifth, and succeeding moments ? In view of this objection, he states
the aphorism. Falling of arrow, how caused.

If only a single resultant energy be productive of a succession of actions
there would be, under no circumstances whatever, a falling of the arrow, because of the
the resultant energy which is productive of aciton. (To this objection, he
Saiiiskara-abhave, in the absence of resultant energy he states:

5. 18. In the absence of propulsive energy generated by action,
falling (results) from gravity. 198.

Gravity, which is the cause of falling, invariably follows (thearrow),
at every moment. That gravity, being counter-acted by resul
tant energ/, could not cause the falling (of the arrow;. Now, in theabsence
of the counter-active, the very same gravity causes falling. This is the meaning. 18.

Note: Here you can see what I stated in the OP is indeed true, it is recognised by
the school that motion is instantaneous and not continuous resultant energy of
the arrow from the initial momentum energy by the bow, is productive of a series
of actions causing its forward movement, the arrow begins to fall due to gravity at each successive moment, following a parabolic path. At its height, gravity could not cause its fall, due to the loss of its kinetic energy, it begins to fall under gravity. The horizontal component is not affected by gravity, gravity only accounts for the vertical component.

Note my original claim was that gravity is a doctrine in Hinduism. It is explicitly stated
as the cause of falling of all objects. I have only covered the oldest text that is the first
to mention it, there are later texts that go into more detail. This is not considered controversial
to those knew about the Vaiseshika school, such as John Adams who made a study of it
and it is also mentioned in India NCERT physics books.

Atoms:

4.2. The effect is the mark (of the existence) of the ultimate
atom. 2.

1 Accordingly the sutras of Gautama " From
the evolved is the production of the evolved, on the evidence of (ex
perience by) perception" (Nyaya-sutram IV. i. II). Now the inter
relation of parts and wholes is perceived. If it were unlimited, there
would be no difference in size of measurement between mount Meru and
a grain of mustard seed ; for, they would be without distinction, both
being orginated by infinite parts. Nor can it be said that difference
will be caused by the differences of the size of each part, and of the
aggregation of parts ; for, without a difference of number, these also would
be impossible. If it be said that pralaya or destruction of the creation
may be the limit (of the series of parts and wholes) ; (we reply that) the
final something ex-hypothesi) having no parts, pralaya itself would be
impossible, for it is only disjunction and destruction of parts which can
destroy substances. Nor is disjunction the limit, for it is impossible for
it to have only one substratum. Therefore, a substance without parts,,
must be the limit, and this is the ultimate atom. A mote is not the limit ;
for, being a visible substance, it possesses magnitude, and is composed
of more substance than one ; magnitude, as the cause of visual percep
tion, presupposes, or is dependent upon, multiplicity of substance ;
else there would be no magnitude even, what then would be the cause ?
Nor are the constituent parts of the mote atoms, for we must infer
that they also, as originatfve of a substance possessing magnitude,.
are compossed of parts, like thread, and like potsherd. Therefore.
whatever substance is an effect, is composed of parts, and whatever
substance is composed of parts, is an effect. So that from whichever
part the nature of being an effect goes away, from it goes away also
the nature of being made up of parts. This is the proof of the existence
of indivisible ultimate atoms.

4.3. The existence (of colour, etc.) in the effect, (follows) from,
(their) existence in the cause. 159.
The existence of colour, etc., in the effect, is due to their existence
in the cause. For the attributes of the effect result from the attributes
of the cause, the same being observed in the case of the water-pot,
canvas, etc. This is the meaning. 3.

/ i. e., the existence, of the effect/ i. e., compound bodies,
follows from the existence of the cause, i. e., the primary cause (viz.,
ultimate atoms). Otherwise, like the quality of being clayey, of that
which is made of clay, it would follow that effects, i. e r compound bodies
would be non-existent, because they are constituted by what is non
existent.

<snip>

4. 6. External perception (takes place), in respect of an object
possessing magnitude, by means of its possession of that which
is composed of more substances than one, and by means of its.
colour. 162.

The commentary is abtuse, so ill simplify it. Only atomic compounds
can be perceived, because they have magnitude and colour, ultimate
atoms are are responsible for originating
attributes in substances e.g. fire atoms, originate colour, wind atoms
touch potentials, earth atoms smell, and water atoms taste. They are all
specific kind of atoms, and responsible for specific properties.

Edit: Too add some corrections.
 
Last edited:

Aubrey Meyer

New Member
I was inspired by the thread religion adapting to scientific discoveries to start this thread. The idea that science and religion are mutually exclusive, which has its roots in Cartesian thought, is not something which occurs in Hinduism. In Hinduism science and religion compliment one another. It is the only religion that has its own systems of philosophy, the so-called 6 systems(sad-darsanas) and it the only religion that actually has science as a part of it -- like the science of politics economics(arthashastra) science of medicine(ayurveda) science of linguistics(vyakarana) --- and hundreds more. The Hindu scriptures teach that we need both material knowledge(apara vidya) and spiritual knowledge(paravidya) Hence, why science was cultivated by Hindus as a religious principle. Sounds strange, that doing science is actually a religious practice! Maybe that may explain why Hindus even today have a reputation for being patrons of science.

But there are some scientific facts and claims in Hinduism which are so staggering that are they are unbelievable, and yet completely true. I wanted to present just 5 examples of of these, which are taught as fully developed doctrine in Hinduism.

1. Evolution: Hinduism teaches that life evolves over billions of years of evolution from the first form of life produced by water and heat, over 8.4 million(they even quantify it, that's amazing) life forms. Remarkably, this number includes hundreds of thousands of humans living on other planets. It goes beyond humans though too, beyond humans are higher dimensional entities(gods basically) and beyond them is the creator lord(Brahma) The mechanism of this evolution is sort of like modern epigenetic theories, the life form reacts with its environment, and evolves those features that it needs to survive in the environment. However, it does not do this necessarily intelligently(so it is not intelligent design) its intelligence evolves too over a long time, it is more through a process of trial and error that these features -- or mutations appear.

There is some new research now that suggests that Darwin knew about Hindu theory of evolution, through Buddhist sources. Hindus also made attempts in zoology and botany science(another science that is a part of Hinduism) and enumerated thousands of types of plants and animals, long before origin of species was written.

2. Big bang: Hinduism teaches that the universe constantly expands and contracts, known as the doctrine of evolution and involution, represented with the metaphor of the life of Brahma. 100 years of the life of Brahma is the entire life span of the universe and that is 311.08 trillion years. In those 311 trillion years many universes form(brahmandas) and in those universes stars and planets form(surya mandala, pritvhi mandala), each with the life span of 8.64 billion years(1 day and night of Brahma). It describes that towards the end of that period(after 4.32 billion years) the sun starts to swallow the Earth, the sky turns red, the oceans boil away and the Earth can no longer support life. I mean seriously, where did they pull these numbers from accurate to two decimal places. This even impressed Carl Sagan, who noted they are staggeringly close to modern estimates.

Another startling revelation in Hinduism is the notion of an age of Manu(Manvantara) which lasts 306.72 million years, at the end of this all life on the planet is destroyed. It is taught we are 7th life on this planet, there have already been 6 mass extinctions of life on this planet. There will be 14 such Manus in the day phase of Brahma. The current Manu is called Vaishvata Manu.

It still gets more amazing. It describes the universe coming into being from nothing(well not exactly nothing, some sort of fuzzy state between existence and non-existence) which sounds like something from inflation and supersymmetry though. It says that in the beginning the three fundamental qualities of nature or the gunas are in a state of super-balance(meaning they have not yet diverged) The first one to break away is the guna responsible for activity, expansion(rajas). It causes the universe to expand rapidly, then the guna that is responsible for inertia, contraction acts against it, and the expansion slows down. The final guna, responsible for balance(sattva) acts on both to maintain harmony. In the end(after 311 trillion years) the gunas will resolve back into a state of super-balance and the universe will be destroyed. The cycle then repeats forever. This great cosmic cycle is mirrored at the atomic level, where every moment atoms are being created and destroyed. This atomic dance, is represented beautifully by dancing Shiva image(nataraja) and has been adopted by CERN which has a giant version outside of it.

3. Atoms: Hinduism teaches the existence of atoms as a matter of fact basis. I think it is the only religion(the other one being Jainism) that actually fully accepts doctrine of atoms. But this atomism is far far superior to the one of Democritus(some research shows that Democritus probably learned it in India, as there are Hellenic records of his contact with India -- who knows?) Hinduism teaches the classical doctrine of 5 elements as what matter is made of, but it is more sophisticated then the classical Greek version; the 5 elements range from subtle to gross, with the subtle part being atoms of the element. So fire for example is only the most gross version of the subtle fire atoms. The subtle atoms are characterised by the property they are responsible for --- so fire atoms give the property of colour(its a dead ringer for photons) and these atoms are infinitesimal, described as having point like dimension and imperceptible. Atomic aggregates gain magnitude not because of different size of atoms, but because of clusters of atoms. Akasha(often translated as ether) is the only element which is non-atomic, it is described as propagating through waves and it the most fundamental state of physical matter -- this is why Hindus believe it is in fact sound that creates all physical mater.(It is not sound in the audible sense, but the inaudible sound(pranava) that yogis claim to hear in meditation --- AUM


The most amazing part is even how atoms combine is described. The Greeks said atoms combine through random collisions, and they joint together through micro-nuts and bolts. In Hinduism atoms do not combine randomly, they combine according to precise laws. Primary atoms combine to form binary atoms, binary atoms to form trinary atoms and so on, until the most gross visible atom, motes of dust in a sun beam. So central are atoms in Hindu thought, that even classical Hindu measurements of time and space begin with the time and length of primary atoms, then binary and so on.

They combine though exchange of energy(doctrine of paka, means cooking) and the chemical properties of the compound change based on its atomic combinations. There are three types of reactions 1) where atomic bonds are broken and recombine to form new products 2) Where atoms bonds are not broken, but molecular changes take place. The third type of reaction is just a state change, where neither atomic bonds are broken or molecular changes take place, but the atoms gain or lose more fluidity to become either solid, liquid or gas.

It is wrongly thought that by some Indologists(like A L Basham) atomic theories of Hindus were just pure speculation that just happened to get it right(like epistemic luck) in fact they were based in empirical observation. The texts describe observations of say colour changes of how bricks change when heated, and then explain it terms of atomic and molecular changes. There are entire treatises written on chemistry(rasashatra) and lab equipment described, including chemical tests like flame tests to identify elements.

4. Gravity: Hinduism teaches the cause of falling to be Sanskrit "gurutva" literally translates to heaviness. Interestingly, the word gravity has the same etymology. In the Vaiseshika sutras, the laws of gravity and motion are stated in a matter of fact aphorisms. The most startling of these aphorisms(sutras) is the description of why an arrow follows a parabolic path. It goes something like this: The energy transferred from the bow to the arrow causes the arrow to course forward in proportion to the energy, this is reproduced at every moment causing its forward motion, the arrow would course forward forever were it not for gravity, the arrow gradually loses energy at every moment because gravity acts against it. The most startling revelation here is that motion is instantaneous not continuous. Later, this understanding was used by Brahmagupta to explain that things fall towards the centre of the planet Earth due to Earth's gravity, in order to explain why we don't fall of the Earth though it is spherical and spins on its axis. Later differential calculus to calculate the instantaneous motion of a body was developed by Bhaskara II (see Bhāskara II - Wikipedia) .

5. The equivalence of energy and matter: Many don't actually know this, but before Einstein published his theory of relativity, Tesla inspired by his meetings with the famous Hindu guru Swami Vivekananda who taught him the Samkhya philosophy(one of 6 schools of Hindu philosophy) tried to prove all energy and matter were equivalent. In an unpublished essay he tried to prove this using Sanskrit terms Akasha and Prana. Samkhya basically teaches that all matter, including light and energy manifests from a single substratum(moolaprakriti, means root matter) which is infinitely subtle, hence imperceptible, and remarkably it says at this level all matter is undifferentiated, non-dual and unified(avyukta) How matter goes from this level to the manifest level(where it is particular) is the subject of great debate in Samkhya and later Advaita philosophy. It is either a real change(parinam-vada) or an apparent change(vivarta-vada) In Samkhya the explanation will literally astound you: It is the observer that observes the root level of matter that causes the state to collapse into the manifest particular state(it also collapses the super-balance state of the gunas)

If you think this sounds like quantum physics, then you then are right. Just as many don't know Tesla's Hindu connection, many do not know that Schrodinger(considered the father of quantum mechanics) developed his theories after reading Samkhya. He was so convinced that Samkhya was true, that he wanted to give empirical and mathematical proofs of it -- his biographer confirms it. He converted to Hinduism, often used Sanskrit terms in his writings to describe concepts in quantum physics, kept a copy of the Bhagvad Gita on his bedside table and even named his cat Atman. It is even confirmed, that his famous Schrodinger's cat paradox(to show the absurdity of observer-collapse theory) was based on an old debate of the same observer paradox. Just as observer collapse is controversial today in quantum physics, it was controversial back then too, almost 2000 years ago. Schrodinger was not the only one, all the pioneers of quantum physics all made huge studies of Samkhya, including Heisenberg, Wigner and Bohm(who sided with apparent change doctrine of Advaita, and even had an Advaita mentor, the illustrious Krishnamurthy)


I would like to add some words of caution. We cannot overstate that Hinduism is all science, what I have presented above is a distilled version to extract only the scientific part. In Hinduism science, spirituality, mythology, history, ritual, art all are mixed with each other.
 

Aubrey Meyer

New Member
Not sure if I have got the hang of this 'reply function' . . . but in case I have . . .

While I dwell on 'quanta' and the endlessly fascinating Dwaita/Adwaita Wave/Particle 'duality' (or not) discussed here, to read that Schrodinger called his pet cat 'Atman', got me purring all the way to this milk - it is a really lovely story.
 
Last edited:

Spirit_Warrior

Active Member
Not sure if I have got the hang of this 'reply function' . . . but in case I have . . .

While I dwell on 'quanta' and the endlessly fascinating Dwaita/Adwaita Wave/Particle 'duality' (or not) discussed here, to read that Schrodinger called his pet cat 'Atman', got me purring all the way to this milk - it is a really lovely story.

It is indeed an interesting and thought provoking metaphor to see the Avaita and Dvaita dichotomy as particle wave duality. Although both schools are mutually opposed to one another, with one saying reality is non-dual, the other saying it is dual. There is another school bhedabedha which says reality is both non-dual and dual depending on how you approach it. I was traditionally on the non-dual side, but over the years I have realised there is no way to know for certain. I am just prepared to be just agnostic on the matter.

I did want to point out something within the Vaiseshika school I just described above, where there is definitely an implied particle/wave duality. As I mentioned there are four kinds of atoms in Vaiseshika thought and the final physical matter is akasha(translated as ether, but can be deceptive) which is the root substratum of the four atoms. Here is how the properties of the atoms are described in the sutras

Earth: Touch, colour, taste and smell
Water: Touch, colour and taste
Fire: Touch, colour
Air: Touch
Akasha: waves

It is implied that as the primary atoms originate from the akasha that they have a wave-aspect too. Now Gravity, magnetism, and electrostatic attraction have been described as belonging to air category because they have touch, but no colour. Light, heat and fire belong to the fire category because they colour but no taste.. Fluids, currents belong to the water category, because they have taste but not smell. Hard atoms, rocks, planets belong to the earth category because they have smell;. They would all have a wave-aspect too as akasha is fundamental. There is also an implied evolution from how matter starts as waves, then becomes forces, then light, then currents and finally hard matter.

I just thought this would be an interesting observation to share.
 
Last edited:

Aubrey Meyer

New Member
The name of Schrodinger's Cat - Atman - really spoke to me. But the super-position of dead/alive-cat suggested to me that perhaps naming his cat 'Elektra' might have been more appropriate.
 
Last edited:

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
5 Little known but amazing scientific facts about Hinduism


Please quote from Veda/Yajurveda to support one's stance. Please give clear passages from Veda/Yajurveda about:

1. Evolution
2. Big bang
3. Atoms
4. Gravity
5. The equivalence of energy and matter

Please
Regards
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
Einstein is regarded by many as one of the greatest scientists of the 20thcentury. But it is interesting to know what according to Einstein are some of the greatest inventions or discoveries of human race. The following statements of Einstein will explain his views on the scientific discoveries of the ancient Hindus.

Ø “We owe a lot to Indians, who taught us how to count, without which no worthwhile scientific discovery could have been made”.

Ø “When I read the Bhagavad-Gita and reflect about how God created this universe everything else seems so superfluous”.

When asked from where he drew inspiration for his scientific inventions, Einstein replied,

Ø “I have made the Bhagwad Gita as the main source of my inspiration and guide for the purpose of scientific investigations and formation of my theories”.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Einstein is regarded by many as one of the greatest scientists of the 20thcentury. But it is interesting to know what according to Einstein are some of the greatest inventions or discoveries of human race. The following statements of Einstein will explain his views on the scientific discoveries of the ancient Hindus.

Ø “We owe a lot to Indians, who taught us how to count, without which no worthwhile scientific discovery could have been made”.

Ø “When I read the Bhagavad-Gita and reflect about how God created this universe everything else seems so superfluous”.

When asked from where he drew inspiration for his scientific inventions, Einstein replied,

Ø “I have made the Bhagwad Gita as the main source of my inspiration and guide for the purpose of scientific investigations and formation of my theories”.

Yet, one could not quote from Vedas in support of the proposition. Vedas must have core teaching of the Hinduism.
Right?
Please
Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Veda is the basis of the religions called Hinduism. Veda does not claim to be a book of science.
So, the title of the thread is not correct. Please
Regards
 
Top