• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

14 Signs of Fascism

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
Yesterday the proposed laws (bills) for this next period of parliament were announced (as read out by Her Madge). The government has an 80 seat majority and so they'll pass. What's coming will make it possible for the Prime Minister to control when a general election takes place, make it harder for people to vote, make it harder to challenge government decisions, and make it harder for anyone to protest about any of this.
Mmmm. Sounds a lot like the recent spate of new laws some U.S. states are passing. But, in the U.S. there are some checks on states passing their own laws. A state law can be overturned for being unconstitutional at the state or the federal levels, or could be overridden by a federal law.

I don't know much about the UK system in those ways. Does the UK have any checks and balances? Does the UK have any kind of court or panel that can review a national law and decide if it's constitutional or some such?
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
It's a bit like a horoscope, people will see what they want in vague, malleable statements.

(also, fascism had disdain for the arts? It was massive on aesthetic and was significantly influenced by Futurism. Hitler was an artist and Nazism was influenced by Wagner)

Yes, a person can see it how they just prefer.

But, someone could do better than just 'malleable' and 'vague' on this list, with some effort.

e.g. #14 --
In the U.S. the elections in several states were reviewed in a variety of ways, checked, and the results updated and proven valid in overall result. That's not a vague thing, to audit ballots, but a process, so the ballots and the count were in those states tested, objectively.
For example, I have a close relative that wanted Trump to win, but admitted (like Cheney, Romney, many others) that Biden won and fairly. It was not really a malleable assessment that relative was doing on that one.

But, sure, many others interpret how they just prefer instead.

But of course the Nazis did this also --
Degenerate Art exhibition
Modern artworks were purged from German museums. ...
Art in Nazi Germany - Wikipedia

So, keeping in mind the Nazis did suppress art they didn't like, it was interesting to recall the Nazi aesthetic as you did though, about art styles they did like.
 

Kooky

Freedom from Sanity
(also, fascism had disdain for the arts? It was massive on aesthetic and was significantly influenced by Futurism. Hitler was an artist and Nazism was influenced by Wagner)
Try googling the term Entartete Kunst.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
It's a bit like a horoscope, people will see what they want in vague, malleable statements.

(also, fascism had disdain for the arts? It was massive on aesthetic and was significantly influenced by Futurism. Hitler was an artist and Nazism was influenced by Wagner)
Facsists have disdain for some arts. They usually don't like abstract, progressive or experimental arts. Anything new, confusing, or that makes them think makes them uncomfortable.
Wagner, on the other hand, was inspiring.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
Anything new, confusing, or that makes them think makes them uncomfortable.
Nonsense. They didn't like modern and post-modern art because much of it was just ugly, didn't represent anything and encourages social and cultural decline. Art, to a Fascist, is supposed to uplift the people and culture, be beautiful and encourage concepts like duty, celebrating land and nation, etc. So they tended to favor Classical and Neoclassical forms of fine art and architecture.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The list is incomplete.
15 Corporate power is suppressed.
16 Religion is suppressed.
17 Political diversity is suppressed.
18 Monitoring speech & conduct of the populace.
19 Suppressing foreign reporters.
20 Government disobeying its own laws.
21 Criminal trials have pre-determined verdicts.
22 Government has "The Truth".
 
Last edited:

Secret Chief

nirvana is samsara
Here in the US, the most obvious sign, to the casual foreign tourist, is #1 -- with the the proliferation of chauvinist symbols like flags and flag bunting everywhere, and the transformation of sports events to political rallies, with flags, anthems, standing to attention, &c.
We're looking much like Germany in the '30s:



I don't think the original architect would approve of this:
iu

File:New York Stock Exchange Facade.JPG - Wikimedia.
Flags are big here too. Every minister interviewed in their homes (becaue of lockdown) had a flag in shot. Even in the kitchen. It became a joke, but of course laughing at the flag is unpatriotic.
 
Facsists have disdain for some arts. They usually don't like abstract, progressive or experimental arts. Anything new, confusing, or that makes them think makes them uncomfortable.
Wagner, on the other hand, was inspiring.

Fascism was influenced by Futurism :

Futurism glorified war, power, chaos, and destruction – ways of forcing humankind into novelty. Futurists celebrated the beauty of machines, the morals of might, and the syntax of babble. Old-fashioned values, including sensitivity, kindness, and fragility, they dismissed in favour of ruthlessness, candour, strength. They painted ‘lines of force’ – symbols of coercion – and machines in madcap motion. Earlier artists had tried and failed to capture the speed and rhythm of industrial energy: Turner’s steam engine is a blur, Van Gogh’s depressingly static. But the Futurists excelled them by breaking motion into its constituent elements, like physicists splitting atoms, and copying the way cinema reflected movement in split-second sequences of successive frames. The excitement of speed – attained by the new-fangled internal combustion engine – represented the spirit of the age, speeding away from the past.

Futurism united adherents of the most radical politics of the twentieth century: fascists, for whom the state should serve the strong, and communists, who hoped to incinerate tradition in revolution. Fascists and communists hated each other and relished their battles, first in the streets and later, when they took over states, in wars bigger and more terrible than any the world had ever seen. But they agreed that the function of progress was to destroy the past.

The radical politics of futurists and fascists—and us, here, today
 

Secret Chief

nirvana is samsara
Last edited:

Secret Chief

nirvana is samsara
Facsists have disdain for some arts. They usually don't like abstract, progressive or experimental arts. Anything new, confusing, or that makes them think makes them uncomfortable.
Wagner, on the other hand, was inspiring.
If you want to invade another country, you can't beat Bruckner. OTOH, the British government have just announced an absolutely massive cut in funding for the arts in higher education.
 
Top