What system isn't?Except that by definition, capitalism isn't about meeting human needs in society. It's about creating wealth and perpetuating it.
In and of itself, it's a flawed and immoral system.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What system isn't?Except that by definition, capitalism isn't about meeting human needs in society. It's about creating wealth and perpetuating it.
In and of itself, it's a flawed and immoral system.
Accepting that, what system has a better record of morality?Well, capitalism by definition bases all productive activity on the profit motive, and considers the prospect of meeting human needs in society irrelevant.
Perhaps I should have said amoral.
-Nato
I was only talking about the system in theory. But the docile, democratic socialism practiced in Scandinavia when the left was in power was, in practice, a much more humane system than capitalism.Accepting that, what system has a better record of morality?
What about the docile & humane capitalism practiced by Amish?I was only talking about the system in theory. But the docile, democratic socialism practiced in Scandinavia when the left was in power was, in practice, a much more humane system than capitalism.
Make up your mind. Initially I was talking about the systems in theory. You were the one who asked which system has the better "record of morality." I think systems in Scandinavia which provided a social safety net for millions of people represent a better track record than the species of humane capitalism practiced by what, a few thousand Amish?Naw....you can't say a system is better just because you seek out an example of it turning out that way.
You addressed an example of implementation of a system, rather than a theoretical system.Make up your mind. Initially I was talking about the systems in theory. You were the one who asked which system has the better "record of morality." I think systems in Scandinavia which provided a social safety net for millions of people represent a better track record than the species of humane capitalism practiced by what, a few thousand Amish?