You certainly come off as angry. It seems you’re angry because you’re not getting what you want, so you keep spewing the bs and repeating yourself over and over in hopes it will get you what you want. It won’t. If you don’t understand spirituality and know what I’ve been telling you, then too...
Your comments are mostly angry BS. They are close-minded and extremely self-righteous. Your words show signs of know-it-all-ism, which is really words of foolish-ism.
I expect a tidbit of open-mindedness and words of intelligence on a debate forum, not foul attitudes and stale sentences...
It’s not quick offense, it’s annoyance. None of your annoying points were worth my time to respond to, get a clue. For me, there is evidence that the theory of evolution is false. Some of that evidence gets used in an attempt to prove the theory.
Well, one or two people answered my topic question. Others chose to make it about me by proceeding to tell me what, and how I was thinking and feeling; then, told me I should change and how I should change. Hahaha. Still, others acknowledged, but justified the way “debates”go on and that...
So instead of answering my topic question, you serve as evidence to my topic by criticizing and nit-picking me, and misconstruing what I said in my responses to others. Great job by illustrating my points!! Thank you.
So, the non-religious group doesn’t have to be civil? Got it. It’s obvious it’s not expected out of them. They don’t expect it out of themselves, either. The double-standard is absolutely appalling. No wonder most of the civil people appear to have left. What a shame.
You asked me to answer one of your questions in your post #1572 on page 79.
I answered your 4th question in my post #1574 on page 79. In your post #1840, you said that you tried, and got no answer, and claimed God isn’t real. You gave yourself less than 24 hours from the time I answered your...
If it’s actually debate, possibly, otherwise what is there to learn from attacking comments and words that are unrelated and irrelevant to the topic? What’s the point of having several off-topic, unrelated, on-going arguments inside the posted debate topic? It’s confusion, not learning.
What...
Well, silly me. I joined this website because I thought it would be interesting to learn about others’ beliefs and religions from around the world. On some topics, it would be interesting to find out why they believe what they believe. On debate forums, I expected— at least part of the time—...
So you don’t have the science definition of proof and evidence from a science book then? Ok. One would not need a science background in anything, in order to understand a definition of proof and evidence. You are simply making that your rule. If you can’t provide a simple but truthful...
I’m aware of the quote. I covered that info in my comments more than once.
“Should have” means NOTHING. Please, provide the LAW of New York or the Federal law that says that confessing to saying “murder-suicide” WILL put a flag on a person’s record and WILL keep a person from buying a...
This is a general English definition of proof. It claims no specific field. No one yet has provided the definition of proof or evidence from a science book that defines it as something other than what our own language does.
And the droning-on is proven. Instead of droning on with a boring explanation I’m not going to read, why not provide the short definition of proof and evidence as provided in a credible science book?
The definition I provided is a general definition, non-specific to any field of study. It is...