• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. F

    There is no evidence for God, so why do you believe?

    Huh? You really think I’m gonna take the time to read your long diatribe? I couldn’t care less about what you have to say.
  2. F

    There is no evidence for God, so why do you believe?

    You certainly come off as angry. It seems you’re angry because you’re not getting what you want, so you keep spewing the bs and repeating yourself over and over in hopes it will get you what you want. It won’t. If you don’t understand spirituality and know what I’ve been telling you, then too...
  3. F

    There is no evidence for God, so why do you believe?

    Your comments are mostly angry BS. They are close-minded and extremely self-righteous. Your words show signs of know-it-all-ism, which is really words of foolish-ism. I expect a tidbit of open-mindedness and words of intelligence on a debate forum, not foul attitudes and stale sentences...
  4. F

    Debating vs Arguing vs Antagonizing vs Nit-picking, what are they?

    It’s not quick offense, it’s annoyance. None of your annoying points were worth my time to respond to, get a clue. For me, there is evidence that the theory of evolution is false. Some of that evidence gets used in an attempt to prove the theory.
  5. F

    Debating vs Arguing vs Antagonizing vs Nit-picking, what are they?

    First, you didn’t answer the question in the paragraph you quoted. Second, I did not mention religion in that quoted paragraph.
  6. F

    Debating vs Arguing vs Antagonizing vs Nit-picking, what are they?

    Well, one or two people answered my topic question. Others chose to make it about me by proceeding to tell me what, and how I was thinking and feeling; then, told me I should change and how I should change. Hahaha. Still, others acknowledged, but justified the way “debates”go on and that...
  7. F

    Debating vs Arguing vs Antagonizing vs Nit-picking, what are they?

    So instead of answering my topic question, you serve as evidence to my topic by criticizing and nit-picking me, and misconstruing what I said in my responses to others. Great job by illustrating my points!! Thank you.
  8. F

    Debating vs Arguing vs Antagonizing vs Nit-picking, what are they?

    I said nothing about Christ, a Christian forum, or Christianity. The word was “civil.”
  9. F

    Debating vs Arguing vs Antagonizing vs Nit-picking, what are they?

    So, the non-religious group doesn’t have to be civil? Got it. It’s obvious it’s not expected out of them. They don’t expect it out of themselves, either. The double-standard is absolutely appalling. No wonder most of the civil people appear to have left. What a shame.
  10. F

    There is no evidence for God, so why do you believe?

    You asked me to answer one of your questions in your post #1572 on page 79. I answered your 4th question in my post #1574 on page 79. In your post #1840, you said that you tried, and got no answer, and claimed God isn’t real. You gave yourself less than 24 hours from the time I answered your...
  11. F

    Debating vs Arguing vs Antagonizing vs Nit-picking, what are they?

    If it’s actually debate, possibly, otherwise what is there to learn from attacking comments and words that are unrelated and irrelevant to the topic? What’s the point of having several off-topic, unrelated, on-going arguments inside the posted debate topic? It’s confusion, not learning. What...
  12. F

    Debating vs Arguing vs Antagonizing vs Nit-picking, what are they?

    Well, silly me. I joined this website because I thought it would be interesting to learn about others’ beliefs and religions from around the world. On some topics, it would be interesting to find out why they believe what they believe. On debate forums, I expected— at least part of the time—...
  13. F

    Darwin's Illusion

    So you don’t have the science definition of proof and evidence from a science book then? Ok. One would not need a science background in anything, in order to understand a definition of proof and evidence. You are simply making that your rule. If you can’t provide a simple but truthful...
  14. F

    10 killed in Buffalo, NY store shooting!

    I’m aware of the quote. I covered that info in my comments more than once. “Should have” means NOTHING. Please, provide the LAW of New York or the Federal law that says that confessing to saying “murder-suicide” WILL put a flag on a person’s record and WILL keep a person from buying a...
  15. F

    Why Evolution Is Wrong In Biology And What is Right?

    This is a general English definition of proof. It claims no specific field. No one yet has provided the definition of proof or evidence from a science book that defines it as something other than what our own language does.
  16. F

    10 killed in Buffalo, NY store shooting!

    You didn’t answer my question. You simply provided a long explanation on something you thought applied.
  17. F

    Darwin's Illusion

    And the droning-on is proven. Instead of droning on with a boring explanation I’m not going to read, why not provide the short definition of proof and evidence as provided in a credible science book? The definition I provided is a general definition, non-specific to any field of study. It is...
  18. F

    10 killed in Buffalo, NY store shooting!

    What do you mean? Why not expand with some more statistics comparing how few murders by guns there are compared to how many guns exist? Etc.?
  19. F

    There is no evidence for God, so why do you believe?

    Another deity existed before and formed my deity. My deity is made of flesh, bones, and spirit. If he is unevidenced to you, that is a shame.
  20. F

    There is no evidence for God, so why do you believe?

    If that were true, no one would respond to my posts.
Top