Of course COVID by itself doesn't serve a useful and helpful purpose, but the point is that real life, physical connection with people DOES. That's not to say we shouldn't take precautions. We absolutely should. But there is still a need for contact with people, and no, "virtual" communication...
The evidence is pretty strong that getting the virus provides some temporary immunity, but no one knows exactly how much or for how long, so yeah, getting the vaccine is still a good idea, and that's why everyone will probably need to get vaccinated at least every year.
There are lots of good arguments for atheism, but this is actually a pretty bad one. It's easy to get around it logically simply by stating that whatever happens in the universe is what God wants. We might hate it and THINK that it's evil, but if there's an omnipotent god and we define the word...
Fair enough. But my argument still holds. Maybe nursing home workers do NOT have the highest expected number of hospitalizations that will directly follow from them contracting the virus. But, obviously, I think you would agree, every person theoretically has a different expected number of...
Hmm. I guess I'm not familiar with the equipment that nursing home workers wear. I assume that most of them wear masks and gloves, but given the close contact with residents, including administering medication, feeding, and in some cases changing catheters and diapers, I would imagine the risk...
Actually, I would support a system with different speed limits for different people, if in fact it could be effectively enforced. A professional racecar driver could probably drive safely at much higher speeds on the roads than the average person, and people with measured reaction times that are...
But it should change the general guidance. If a person who lives alone and works from home contracts COVID without knowing it, they are far less likely to accelerate the spread--they probably won't spread it to anyone at all. If a healthcare worker gets COVID without knowing it, they could...
I suppose that depends on what you mean by "responsible." I think that healthcare workers and people who work with higher numbers of people in their jobs are more responsible for hospitalizations and deaths, because in the event that they catch it without knowing it, on average, they will...
Please explain how a person who contracts COVID, has mild symptoms or is asymptomatic, does not spread it to anyone, and has no long term complications is a "drain on the system." Certainly you understand that it is more problematic when a person contracts COVID and has a higher probability of...
I'm not sure you're understanding the analogy, because speeding IS analogous in this case.
True, speeding is on a spectrum, in that higher speeds raise the probability of crashing but crashing (like catching COVID) is not on a spectrum. In the same way, different activities performed by...
Hmm. Can't say I agree. Let's say the speed limit is 45. Should a person driving 46 be given the same fine as a person driving 106? If not, then what's the difference between this and drunk driving? Exceeding the speed limit by a small amount increases the likelihood of crashing by a smaller...
Fair enough, however, wouldn't you agree that an emphasis should be placed on those who are routinely exposed to a high number of vulnerable people? Something like: "Everyone should stay home, ESPECIALLY those who interact with high risk people who have a higher probability of being...
That's true, but not exactly my point. To try to summarize it more concisely: Since the goal is minimizing the number of hospitalizations, a person's behavior should be calibrated based on the expected number of severe cases that would occur as a result of them getting the virus. Obviously this...
One of the things that bothers me about the government and media messaging about COVID-19 is the lack of nuance and critical thought applied to the messages about how people should calibrate their behaviors in order to prevent deaths and prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed.
To be more...
I think the simpler way of putting it would be that everyone, whether theist or atheist, has to take the existence of something as a basic, unexplained fact. Atheists take the universe as such, and theists take God as such. The problem I have is when theists accuse atheists of being irrational...
That's a reasonable analysis, although as you already stated we don't know that the speed at which bacterial life formed on earth would be matched on other planets with similar environments. I tend to agree that extraterrestrial life exists, mostly because of the weirdness of earth being the...