• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. N

    Science Communication

    To quote Feynman, "the truth is so much more remarkable." And I never mentioned the deliberately ignorant/called targeting them a "fool's game." In my opinion, they try too much to make it interesting so it sounds a bit odd. Yes, there is a place where you can make it interesting, but science...
  2. N

    Science Communication

    What do you guys think about the state of science communication today? In my opinion, I think that things are being oversimplified. The science communicators seem to not realize that we have something in our pockets capable of looking up the terms that they're using. A great example of someone...
  3. N

    Would/Should God communicate directly to everyone in the world?

    If the god is omnipotent and omnipresent, like many people believe for Abrahamic Gods, then he is more than able to show himself rather than send cryptic messages that are obvious propaganda. For a God like Yahweh, it truly is odd that he commits genocide on multiple occasions and allows Samson...
  4. N

    Universal World Language

    I won't attempt to interpret that verse since it is quite vague, but sure.
  5. N

    Universal World Language

    If you regard all religions equally, then you should not have a universal language, because Yahweh will be pissed at you. Source: Genesis 11
  6. N

    Would/Should God communicate directly to everyone in the world?

    It depends on the God. For example, Yahweh would not show himself, as he is not supposed to in the Bible, however, if he's an all-good and omnibenevolent being then yes, he should, since allowing war, terrorism, arguments, and fights over such a simple idea such as his existence when it can be...
  7. N

    The Main Issues w/ the Kalam Cosmological Argument

    Correct, and this is one of my main issues with claiming that the Atheist position requires Creatio Ex Nihilo. It doesn't, and it never will, until scientists give evidence that it does or doesn't.
  8. N

    Thanks. I'll accept the debate.

    Thanks. I'll accept the debate.
  9. N

    NoToReligion and SA Huguenot creation evidence.

    The probability that he would have spoken to humans on Earth? Even then you're making it bigger than it was. He only spoke to one people, in one region, in only a few, small countries, until Rome came along. But really, why would God speak to humans on Earth? The universe is large and amazing...
  10. N

    Debate on Creationism

    Archaeology.
  11. N

    Debate on Creationism

    You haven't defined "complex" yet, and I am not nature. It would be quite difficult for me to make an atom or cell. However, nature is more than capable of creating things.
  12. N

    Debate on Creationism

    Did God create the universe to wait 9 billion years to have earth, then wait 4 billion years for life to evolve into humans, then wait hundreds of thousands of years so he could give his message to one chosen people in one region of the globe on one spec in our galaxy, then, because they...
  13. N

    Debate on Creationism

    Sorry, I said this isn't science vs. religion. However, if you want me to give you evidence, I can send you messages of evidence.
  14. N

    Debate on Creationism

    Of course you didn't, but you acted like I did when you said "How does logic debunk an Intelligent source for the world around us?"
  15. N

    Debate on Creationism

    What about the "atomic structure" is complex? What about the "many varieties of cells" is complex? I didn't say logic does debunk religion, I said it's the only thing that, within reason, can debunk God. It is up to you to decide if logic debunks God, but it is the best tool of all of them to...
  16. N

    Debate on Creationism

    Yeah, Empirical Evidence is quite odd and fuzzy when discussing God or what God has done. I try to stick to logical evidence because that's the only thing that can reasonably debunk God. Also, thank you.
  17. N

    Debate on Creationism

    I hope to have them be nearly the same thing in the debates, since they usually can be/are.
  18. N

    Debate on Creationism

    Define "complex" in this case.
  19. N

    Debate on Creationism

    You're completely misunderstanding everything I said. First of all, I was speaking of "Your God" in terms of if anyone wants to debate me on God, and second off, they have to prove their God is a thing to me before I say their God exists. That's just how arguments work.
  20. N

    Debate on Creationism

    Because your God can't create the universe if he doesn't exist, so connecting the logical evidence of the God with their "origin mythos" is quite important. And it's about both the God existing and what he did.
Top