To quote Feynman, "the truth is so much more remarkable." And I never mentioned the deliberately ignorant/called targeting them a "fool's game."
In my opinion, they try too much to make it interesting so it sounds a bit odd. Yes, there is a place where you can make it interesting, but science...
What do you guys think about the state of science communication today? In my opinion, I think that things are being oversimplified. The science communicators seem to not realize that we have something in our pockets capable of looking up the terms that they're using. A great example of someone...
If the god is omnipotent and omnipresent, like many people believe for Abrahamic Gods, then he is more than able to show himself rather than send cryptic messages that are obvious propaganda. For a God like Yahweh, it truly is odd that he commits genocide on multiple occasions and allows Samson...
It depends on the God. For example, Yahweh would not show himself, as he is not supposed to in the Bible, however, if he's an all-good and omnibenevolent being then yes, he should, since allowing war, terrorism, arguments, and fights over such a simple idea such as his existence when it can be...
Correct, and this is one of my main issues with claiming that the Atheist position requires Creatio Ex Nihilo. It doesn't, and it never will, until scientists give evidence that it does or doesn't.
The probability that he would have spoken to humans on Earth? Even then you're making it bigger than it was. He only spoke to one people, in one region, in only a few, small countries, until Rome came along. But really, why would God speak to humans on Earth?
The universe is large and amazing...
You haven't defined "complex" yet, and I am not nature. It would be quite difficult for me to make an atom or cell. However, nature is more than capable of creating things.
Did God create the universe to wait 9 billion years to have earth, then wait 4 billion years for life to evolve into humans, then wait hundreds of thousands of years so he could give his message to one chosen people in one region of the globe on one spec in our galaxy, then, because they...
What about the "atomic structure" is complex? What about the "many varieties of cells" is complex?
I didn't say logic does debunk religion, I said it's the only thing that, within reason, can debunk God. It is up to you to decide if logic debunks God, but it is the best tool of all of them to...
Yeah, Empirical Evidence is quite odd and fuzzy when discussing God or what God has done. I try to stick to logical evidence because that's the only thing that can reasonably debunk God. Also, thank you.
You're completely misunderstanding everything I said. First of all, I was speaking of "Your God" in terms of if anyone wants to debate me on God, and second off, they have to prove their God is a thing to me before I say their God exists. That's just how arguments work.
Because your God can't create the universe if he doesn't exist, so connecting the logical evidence of the God with their "origin mythos" is quite important. And it's about both the God existing and what he did.