I'm an agnostic on the issue, but if it isn't by chance, how does the theory of evolution explain the existence of dual coded genes? Be specific, please: what are those possibilities you're hinting at?
It's like a cloud formation writing: ''Hello guys, it's Me writing, but you'll never believe Me, since you say My actions are indistinguishable from random quantum fluctuations, so there is no rational way to conclude I do anything at all :)''. Almost impossible by chance, but admitted: almost...
If it's virtually impossible that dual coded genes came into existence accidentally, then what's the alternative? What instrument does the evolution theory have to its disposal to create dual coded genes?
Determinism doesn't explain away the complexity of duons, it just presumes a deterministic cause without explaining the ''how''. How would you scientifically explain the deterministic evolution of ''dual coded genes''?
Intelligent designer, intelligent designers or intelligent whatever. Whether it, he, she or they have designed it deterministic or not, it seems to me that determinism doesn't defy intelligence as the only alternative.
Thanks for your replies!
On Pubmed - A first look at ARFome: dual-coding genes in mammalian genomes. - PubMed - NCBI - it says that ''dual coding is nearly impossible by chance''. To me it seems that this info poses a challenge for ET, where chance is heavily involved. But again, I'm not an...
Hi all.
I'm new here, living in Spain and looking for evolutionist answers for something called ''duons'' or ''dual coded genes''. I've been told that coincidence can be excluded: it's entirely impossible that dual coded genes came into existence accidentally, therefore intelligence must have...