• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. usfan

    Inquisition of usfan

    I find myself fading from this forum, for several reasons: 1. The vitriol from hostile, dogmatic 'debaters' is more than my dainty disposition can bear. 2. Censorship from biased moderators. 3. Bigotry. I may drop in from time to time, but posting is very painful, which is the intent, i am...
  2. usfan

    Anti Science

    A consensus from 'experts' of a flat earth, the 4 humors, spontaneous generation, and leeches to draw out 'bad blood' did not make these true. Neither does the consensus of universal common ancestry, 13.77 billion years, uniformitarianism, big bang, inflation, or any number of hare brained...
  3. usfan

    Should bad religion be tolerated?

    ..you mean, like the 'bad religion' of communism, based in atheistic naturalism, that promoted genocide and the death of millions last century? Or, the 'bad religion' of national socialism, based in evolution and a 'master race', that should help evolution along, and eliminate inferior stock...
  4. usfan

    Foundation for objective moral standards

    I posted this in a similar thread about morality..
  5. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    The 'pea' reference was just a rhetorical reference.. 'particle', is more precise, even if it is vague and undefined. The whole universe, compressed into a particle.. yeah, that is believable and testable!
  6. usfan

    Evolution My ToE

    ..i would have guessed, because of rude and insulting behavior.. not all people are thick skinned, and can dish it back, to hostile religious bigots.. :shrug:
  7. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    This thread is a punishment.. an origins purgatory.. for those who are in limbo with their beliefs.. ;)
  8. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    You have mixed your philosophical metaphors.. '42' is the Answer, to the 'Meaning of life, the universe, and everything'.. ;)
  9. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    Which study? Did you quote one, or are you referring to the one i sourced in the OP (originally posted by polymath, himself!) I did read that one carefully, and found no methodology for the measurement of 'trillions of a trillionth of a second!', some 13.77 billion years ago.. (which sounds...
  10. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    For the ex nihilo group, what fine point of distinction can be made from 'nothing', to a particle invisible to the eye? This is more like the old monastic debate on how many angels can fit on a pin's head.. ;)
  11. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    ..maybe.. but maybe not. Lots of 'papers' print assumptions, beliefs, and biases, without batting an eye. How would one measure 'trillions of a trillionth of a second?' ..sounds more like a guess, than something empirical. And how would all the matter in the universe, cooped up in some...
  12. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    How do you measure, or differentiate, between 'trillions of trillionths' of a second, and instantaneous? Is that not a nit pick deflection? Was this time frame actually measured, by empirical methodology, or conjectured, to give plausibility to our existence?
  13. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    Great! But it does not answer the question: How did the universe expand trillions-fold, in trillionths of a second? This violates all laws of physics. There is no mechanism that can account for this conjecture. And if it did suddenly expand in such a short time, how can you extrapolate...
  14. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    No. Common ancestry is a belief, with no empirical evidence. It is pounded as an Indoctrination meme, so people THINK there is, 'all this evidence!', but if pressed to present it, they can't do it. Most of what you call, 'proper science education!', is just memorized dogma.. belief presented...
  15. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    Ah, so very similar to the forced Indoctrination from State Mandated institutions.. who fund THEIR religious beliefs through forced taxation, and present common ancestry as 'settled science!', through constant propaganda, until all nod like bobbleheads.
  16. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    ..let me see the repeatable science behind the conjecture of the universe expanding trillions fold, in trillions fold of a second.. this is possible naturally?
  17. usfan

    Big Bang: Whodunit?

    Most people believe the present theory of a 'big bang', for the origins of the universe. Here are some points to ponder, about this theory: 1. Who or What initiated this big bang, compressing the universe into a small size, then exploding it into the universe? 2. What is the difference between...
  18. usfan

    Inquisition of usfan

    :rolleyes: You heckle and disrupt my science threads, with floods of personal attacks and hateful dogpiles, then want to debate science in an inquisition thread? Seriously? :facepalm: No, you and your crony hecklers, with complicity from biased mods, have shown me that rational, scientific...
  19. usfan

    Inquisition of usfan

    Shakespeare is fine, but I'll include a quote from the German Shakespeare, too. ;) I am used to men who mock and scorn things beyond their comprehension. ~ Goethe It is a tragic commentary on the state of knowledge and epistemology, where ridicule substitutes for reason. ..and nowhere is...
  20. usfan

    Inquisition of usfan

    I've not posted here much lately, and am considering the value of time spent. The over the top hostility toward biblical Christians, and the barrages of insults, false accusations, and other logical fallacies are driving me away from this forum. Reason and civility seem despised, here, for a...
Top