• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. poorAtlas

    Why do the word "morality" create so much fuss ?

    I think it's lack of understanding of virtue, which in my opinion is where our Divinity comes from
  2. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

    A stoic is a person First a stoic person is some who handles pain and suffering without complaint. Not relevant to morality. Secondly the science is irrelevant to you and I without the light we would die. Our whole society is based on or manipulation of light(or energy if you must). Research...
  3. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

    And again your ego is that of a burrow
  4. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

    The reason for the title of this thread and the question asked is to bring into question that the way things are labeled and said could be based in reality and lost in how we misinterpret them. If anyone here thinks they could live without a heat source(this includes your body heat), I would...
  5. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

    Agreed good and evil are human constructs. Are they based in the reality of polar opposites?
  6. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

  7. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

    Hang on " in reality there is no darkness" have you ever turned off a light switch or watched the sun go down?I'm sorry but if that made sense for you to say I'm baffled
  8. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

    That light is from fire or heat. Reality is that without heat\fire\light our existence would not be possible. To argue that you or any living in the known universe can survive or exist without it is ludicrous?
  9. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

    I didn't state what I believe. It's not dualism it's the comparison between day and night, to what a dualist religion might refer to as good and evil
  10. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

    Assuming lack the understanding of a definition is an insult. And had your statement had nothing to do with the thread
  11. poorAtlas

    A poll on the specificity of laws from God

    Two sets of laws. Natural Law and Divine Law Both are laws of "God"
  12. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

    Stoicism is the symbol. I like the night, I like it better with moon"light". But as all of must have experienced a person or being that seem to be inherently evil\dark. Is this natural order of the universe? If so how can we be absolute about what is right or wrong? Or virtuous.
  13. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

    I would go with pantheism over panenthism. Maybe your too presumptuous, and slightly insulting. Reality and Divinity being one in the same, the intention of the of the thread would be to establish the nature of right and wrong, and wether it is synonymous to light and dark
  14. poorAtlas

    The Way, The Truth, The Life

    Would it be true to say that light enables life, therefore is synonymous with Good. And therefore darkness must be synonymous with Evil?
  15. poorAtlas

    Can't decide what religion a pantheist belongs to

    Essentially Faith\Religion, are all based on "knowing" life or existance is eternal. I found once I accepted that as absolute fact, I learned to surrender my own will to the the Lord's. There should be no boundaries or walls that completely surround you. Shed the notion of belonging to anything...
  16. poorAtlas

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Concluding that Reality and Divinity must therefore be one in the same.
  17. poorAtlas

    legitimate or?

    Is it possible that all religion is legitimate, but is lost in the interpretation?
Top