• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    in this thread alone I get about 10 to 20 questions from you guys and sometimes I have only 2 to 3 hours to read and respond to those questions. Today I have more time, but just reading those questions is just not enough to answer them all. I have to research everything before answering them.
  2. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Evolutionists do. From a dead, a very dead molecule to man. That's how they summarized evolution and the funny thing is, they are now running away from that argument because they've discovered a new theory, and modern theory of evolution without the classical Darwin’s theory. Poor Darwin!
  3. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    I’ll take his opinion compare to yours. Show me the link or links if you have one..
  4. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Yes, starvation was the cause. So, where is the new information came from again? There is no question they have evolved. The question is did they gain new information and new mechanism. According to you ignorance Meaning you can’t tell the difference between the before and after they were taken...
  5. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    10 to 1 ratio of citrate to glucose can cause starvation. And what is it again? Your opinion only generates ignorance. You don’t have any proof of your claim, and this is only coming from your own ignorance, because if you do, like your math skills, you would have posted it already.
  6. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    You are just guessing. Please read the report. What change are you talking about or at what generation? And if you return them into the glucose environment, will they change back into the old mechanism or is the mechanism was there all the time? Have you ever thought of that? Cit- phenotype...
  7. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    The Cit- phenotype, the old species of E.coli, was replaced by the Cit+ phenotype, the new species of E.coli, right? To digest citrate it needs a transporter protein, right? How did the bacteria “know” when to switch on the genes for making the proteins that could pull citrate into the cell...
  8. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Enough with the rhetoric please. Summarize those links on how you understand them then I would be interested in reading your post.
  9. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Your ignorance is leading you to believe that modern ToE has nothing to do with Darwin’s ToE and using this modern ToE as your STRAWMAN so you can get away from the main argument, i.e., man came from a dead molecule. Really? What is the point of our arguments here then?
  10. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    I don’t think you understand what a genetic basis for the change means. What I meant is, from eating glucose to eating citrate is not a genetic change as in gain new genetic information or gain new mechanism, i.e., by means of mutation, to digest citrate. In the case of E.coli the genetic change...
  11. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    I respect your opinion but do you have anything to back this up like this one, As Dr. Spetner again explains, “I really do not believe that the neo-Darwinian model can account for large-scale evolution [i.e., macroevolution]. What they really can’t account for is the buildup of information. …And...
  12. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Explain gene flow and Darwin’s theory on how life started here on earth and see what you meant by this I don’t think you understand the question here. It’s either God created man according to Genesis 1:27 “God created man in His own image” or man came from molecules is what we are arguing here...
  13. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Do you understand the meaning of new information and new mechanism? Just to give a couple of examples: E.coli feeding on glucose in an aerobic environment, but after consuming all the glucose they started to eat citrate to survive. Cause of mutation: starvation. Guess what, they can’t find any...
  14. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    edit
  15. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    “better technology”? Really? What’s this got to do with Darwin’s theory of where man came from? You need to answer that because that is the main question here.
  16. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Genetic mutation does not produce new genetic info. This is what evolutionist cannot back up with science. What you are saying is the rearranging of the preexisting genetic information through sexual reproduction or genetic mutation. No new information is added on either process. As Dr. Spetner...
  17. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Yes, I do have trouble understanding it. C&P is different from explaining what you’re Copying & Pasting, so if you could summarize it a little bit on how you understand the allele frequency compare to Darwin’s ToE then that would be great.
  18. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Is there a process, known to man today, by which new genetic information is added to the genome that would evolve to a new feature? Nothing!
  19. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    You don’t need to because this is observable while the ToE is not.
  20. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Yes, you do. From where life came from is the main argument in this thread and you guys cannot provide that information. You need to go back to Darwin’s ToE because that is the main argument in this thread [you know the monkey to man theory], but according to you, The funny thing is, your denial...
Top