We have opened up a whole new website dedicated to John 8:1-11.
There are over 50 rare and out of print, or otherwise hard to find articles, and hundreds of photographs of the earliest manuscripts, with analysis.
We have also added a watchdog page monitoring violence against women around the...
Isn't this the same translation that has Moses' wife casually touching his penis with his son's (lopped off) foreskin, on the flimsy basis that 'at his feet' is supposed to be a euphemism for sexual coitus or foreplay everywhere it appears?:
In any case, a good discussion of how incredibly...
I'm not quite sure what you mean.
I posted some good links presenting counter-evidence and arguments in favour of the Pericope de Adultera. Surely that was a reasonable thing to do.
What could be more closely described as 'disappointing slop', than the misleading footnotes in a modern...
If anyone wants to look at the more detailed internal evidence in favour of this passage of John, it can be found in several links here:
Why John 8:1-11 is Authentic
Previously Unconsidered Evidence for John 8 1-11
And also there is a good summary of the evidence here:
Intrinsic...