I told you how it all works, and you're still playing games.
Here's an idea: why don't you talk about where you really stand with religion and we can compare notes?
Really? Then how is it possible that homosexuals are getting married, when society says they can't? Unless they are ignoring society, and the legal definition of marriage, and doing it anyways.
I believe some people enjoy being miserable. Hell is suited for those who enjoy misery. You could even say that some people have grown so accustomed to being miserable, that to hear any opinion that goes counter to this state of mind, would be considered hellish and wrong. It really depends on...
You can have a relationship with other men. Who said you can't? You're a free agent, you can do what you want (within the limits of the law, of course).
Too agnostic. See, there are several levels to an atheist's/agnostic's ignorance: Agnostics merely acknowledge that they don't know whether God exists, or not. This is where your lack of belief argument is most closely suited.
The next level is good old fashioned atheism. This is where the...
Uh-uh. Not strong enough. It's the disbelief in the existence of a deity. As in, "I don't believe in God, because there is no God".
Wrong. It is specifically the disbelief in a deity. As in, "I don't believe in God, because there is no God". It explains, in part, why so many atheists are...
Nope. Theists believe in what they want. Some believe in Christ without really understanding His gospel. Others have taken God's word and put it to the test. What Christians must believe, if they want to return back to their Father in Heaven, is that they must fear God and keep His commandments...
But it is happening, despite the overwhelming evidence that destroys the spirit in the toenail argument. This is why it's time for me to leave you to your mendacity before one of us gets banned.
You're trying to tell me that your God is not an actual being. That's as ridiculous as your claim that brainless forces organized the first human being.
Then why didn't you make that distinction at the outset?
Wrong. It's a preponderance of evidence, and the fact that I made it shows how absurd the spirit in the toenail argument really is. I have truck loads of evidence, and you guys have zilch. Find a new argument, or concede the point.
Appeal to the masses, appeal to history, appeal to millions of testimonies, appeal to so much more than some random thought coming from a hate-filled anti-theist. It's an excellent technique, and it beats the crap out of his argument.