Haha, are you seriously saying that a fish can transition into a human instaneously? Is your IQ through the floor or something? :biglaugh: Because that's what the user was rejecting they saw, and what I agreed with. And now you're sitting there telling me that it's possible for a fish to turn...
That's not what I said, nor have I suggested that. For a staff member who's supposed to be able to read people's posts, you sure aren't doing your job properly.
Stop fishing for attention with that crap. Nowhere did I say in my response to that particular user of this forum that their "no" response implies that evolution couldn't have happened. That's a sick, twisted strawman conjured up by yourself. Despicable, go and learn basic English comprehension...
You've just written a whole paragraph of ********. I didn't say evolution is a fish turning into a human being Mr. Kojo, I asked if you've seen a fish turn into a human being. There's a difference between a question and a statement, something the homo erectus probably knew.
And about Pokemon...
That highlighted word has been used incorrectly, like I said; learn English. BBC have a decent section that could get things moving for you in the right direction.
Don't forget Biology though, try and learn them simultaneously :) Good luck.
I think you need to learn two subjects; biology and English. Biology because I believe you are masking your incompetence of the theory with deflections, and English because you don't understand my posts. http://www.bbc.co.uk/learning/subjects/english.shtml And also, make use of the Berkley link...
I agree, it does seem a little hypocritical for evolutionists to behave that way, I'm not intending to blow my own trumpet here but when I talk to people who genuinely have no clue what the theory of evolution is, yet they believe in it anyway despite not knowing how the evidences for it are...
Like I said, I'll contact you if I need a two-worded rebuttal. It seems as if you're the only person on the internet who provides this service with such quality. I'm glad you're proud of your achievements, as you should be of course.
Right ok. As far as I'm aware, the rules of the forum do not allow posts such as this, namely calling out other members by referring to them as third-persons. So I will be submitting a report. If you want to address me, use the quote function, it's not too difficult sunshine.
I've never seen an argument so elaborately worded and rich in quality since my time on this forum. It was truly a pleasure reading it. I'll let you know next time I need a two-worded rebuttal. :)
It seems as if you're the only one that actually understood where I'm coming from, or maybe I'm being deceived. Nobody else seemed to comprehend the intent behind the question, it was not about the theory of evolution, it was about the conviction behind it. Right, so you've admitted that it is...