Dear epro:
It is impossibe to understand your kind of thinking and writing.
Anyway, I still don't see any explanation at all: why you say that God created the universe is a contradictory statement in itself.
What is contradicting what? in the sentence, God created the universe.
My very...
From epro:
(1) Causality is a component of the universe; (2) you cannot cause causality; (3) thus you cannot cause the universe (or at least not all of it). (4)What don't you understand?
On (1) No comment.
On (2) Give an example of causing causality.
On (3) Obviously I am not causing the...
Thanks, everyone for your contributions.
In the OP I say:
Let us all posters here in RF work together to come to a concurred on answer to the question, Who created God? Is that okay with every poster who cares to participate here?
So, please bear with me, this will sound very undiplomatic...
Who created God?
Let us all posters here in RF work together to come to a concurred on answer to the question, Who created God? Is that okay with every poster who cares to participate here?
I will start.
First and foremost we must concur on the concept of God.
As I am theist because I know...
Dear epro, abstain from getting scornful to cover your ignorance and confusion.
You have not produced two verbatim lines from my posts, where I say something affirmatively in one line, and in another line I say the same thing in the opposite direction.
You keep harping about causality, where I...
Dear Salix, you have taken to flight.
You care to ask the question Who created God?
But you to my suspicion never yourself do any honest genuine intelligent thinking to answer your own question.
I am challenging you to start a new thread in philosophy for you to ask the question, Who created...
Dear Salix, read the title of this thread.
Here, I will bring it to you:
God defined by what He did than by His features.
Discussion in 'Philosophy' started by Pachomius, Tuesday at 4:28 AM.
The thread is about defining the word God by focusing on God's deeds, instead of His features.
Your...
Dear epro:
Cease and desist from evasions.
You allege that I commit an intrinsic contradiction in my argument for the existence of God, in concept as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
I am still waiting for you to produce a verbatim line from my posts...
Dear Salix, we are in philosophy, and I for one - perhaps you not, do not play tricks in philosophy.
So, I am asking you, Are you asking me the question, Who created God?
Answer honestly and intelligently and don't go into nonsense flippancy, this is philosophy.
Dear epro:
The issue now is still that you have not shown any correct understanding at all: of what you say about something intrinsically contradictory in my argument.
You seem to be incapable of thinking relevantly; how should I rebut you when you have not established at all - that I have...
Causality is a feature of the universe. You cannot cause causality nor use causality to explain causality. - epro
Where do I ever say or make it appear that I am using causality to explain causality?
Give me quotes from my posts, okay?
I will not talk with you anymore, because you don't really know my argument.
Why? Simple, you are so muddled up with inutile rote learning.
Proof of that?
Simple, you can't present my argument in less than 50 words, that is the proof of your everlasting muddled up brain/mind.
A concise and...
Addressing epronovost, you seem to be obsessed with my argument for the existence of God, that it suffers from intrinsic contradiction.
Suppose you tell me what you know to be my argument, okay?
Just put it in less than 50 words; if you love to talk endlessly, that just shows that you are all...
Dear Deidre, you believe in God exists, even though you can't prove God exists.
I do not just believe but I know God exists.
Our difference is you believing and I knowing.
So, I propose that you go to threads on God as object of belief, okay?
Still, you are welcome here, though I will excuse...
PS: stolen concept is the name for a fallacy, it doesn't involve an actual theft of intelectual property not more than the term "kettle logic" involves an actual kettle. - epro
Please then talk about actualities, instead of using the word stolen when there is no stealing at all, and also no...