I'm slowly getting there. But I think as a society we should ban the commerce of animals, and simply ban meat because 6 billions is alot to feed, and we are simply doing harm to other beings.
Yes, yes, but do you not see the difference between what they were doing and what we are doing? There are too many to feed, therefore we give ourselves the right to raise animals for the sole purpose of feeding the masses. We are not doing anything honourable in eating a steak or chicken breast.
But you are not killing what you eat. Mass production slaughterhouses are doing what was once a natural part of the world. And the animals hunted in the wild by other animals, are living in their natural environment, not in a tiny filthy cage with 20 other of their species, which makes them go...
So it's fine to raise animals simply to kill them and eat them? Denying their right to a real life within the nature that first brought them to this world...
Thou shalt not kill. Is ending another life not considered a kill?
I eat meat, I drink milk, I love cheese and any other dairy product for that matter. Just so you know, this thread is against myself too! :areyoucra
It is clear that we shouldn't eat other animals, and we shouldn't raise livestock for their milk either. First of all, our teeth are not made...
I haven't posted here in a long time, but I just got frustrated reading this earlier thread about evidence that god exists. This argument for the existence of god always pops up: "There is no evidence God exists, but there is no evidence to support the opposite". How can such an argument hold...
If the soul has a gender, then you are right since homosexuality does not seem to be approved by many christians. But who said christians were right about anything?
That's not better. Equality is all there should be. If what you say is true, then Judaism is further dividing men and women. We should embrace our differences in the minds of our counterparts, not in their tasks.
It doesn't matter which, I'm generalizing christianity, islam and Judaism. We're making progress, yes, of course! But the demonization of women was mainly in the past, which is the basis of all these religions, the past, no?
Canada. but like I said, I'm generalizing.
Forget the gospels...
Margaret Mead is the biggest joke in psychology. Her research was found to be completely bogus, and was made for the sole purpose of her teacher's expectations. The females were not permitted to mate before marriage, and would most probably be cast out of the family or society if they had done...
Incorrect! Our gender is determined by our genes and it is in our nature to be male or female, therefore it is NOT merely cultural programming. If you're going to discard souls, better not discard human nature as well, 'cause then you really can't even begin to explain what you are.
But surely you know of the churches bloodfilled past. Like I mentioned the Malleus Maleficarum was intended as a tool to hunt down unruly women. And doesn't the bible state that women suffer during child labour because of Eve? And that women must bear her sin? Isn't that unfair? If this Adam and...