• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. stevehauk

    Adam was not being "physically created" in Genesis 1 & 2

    All it is saying is that Adam was dust FROM the ground. Here is the literal translation:: Gen 2:7 And forming is Yahweh Elohim --- the human of soil from the ground, --- and He is blowing into his nostrils the breath of the living, and becoming is the human a living soul. So our question...
  2. stevehauk

    Adam was not being "physically created" in Genesis 1 & 2

    Let's 's take your translation:: And Jehove Elohim (God) created the man(Adam) dirt from the earth, and God "blew" life into him. It would be like saying .... And Jehove Elohim (God) created the man(Adam) --- [dirt from the earth being,] --- and God "blew" life into him. So our question...
  3. stevehauk

    Adam was not being "physically created" in Genesis 1 & 2

    Thanks for asking. It works in that God made a spiritual -- not a physical creation. I like to point out that Jesus blew in the disciples faces, John 20:22. How is this different? In Polynesian cultures, a father blows in the face of an infant to show the world, that infant is his.
  4. stevehauk

    Adam was not being "physically created" in Genesis 1 & 2

    It states that Adam is the dirt man, it does not state that is what God made him out of, was my point. Please relook at it.
  5. stevehauk

    Adam was not being "physically created" in Genesis 1 & 2

    I was referring to Jayhawker, but it would make a difference to a nonbeliever too, because this means Adam was not the first human, which means the Bible does not conflict with science.
  6. stevehauk

    Adam was not being "physically created" in Genesis 1 & 2

    Are you kidding? Are you a Christian? This is one of the most fascinating things I've ever heard and you think it's boring?
  7. stevehauk

    Adam was not being "physically created" in Genesis 1 & 2

    In the OP, I said...... Please see for yourself and reply, then I will show you it was a spiritual formation/creation that God made.
  8. stevehauk

    Adam was not being "physically created" in Genesis 1 & 2

    From Book 3 of The Christian MythBuster Series .... This Holy Breath [NOT OXYGEN] of God is the same as the one that is implanted by the Church like a seed in Christians. During their baptism, which, if person’s free will permits, will sprout holiness and bring forth the fruits of the Holy...
  9. stevehauk

    Adam was not being "physically created" in Genesis 1 & 2

    Can you refute it?
  10. stevehauk

    Adam was not being "physically created" in Genesis 1 & 2

    Gen 2:7-8 And Jehovah God forms the man—dust from the ground, and breaths into his nostrils breath of life, and the man becometh a living creature. 8And Jehovah God plants a garden in Eden, at the east, and He sets there the man whom He hath formed; So, in Gen 2:7 it says man became… So what...
  11. stevehauk

    The 1000 year reign of Christ

    Pegg you are right, it is metaphoric. You uncovered much with the above statements you made. One way to prove it's metaphoric is to look at a few key words, like the word "elements" Peter uses. 2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief; in the which the heavens shall pass away...
  12. stevehauk

    The 1000 year reign of Christ

    Pegg you are right, it is metaphoric. You uncovered much with the above statements you made. One way to prove it's metaphoric is to look at a few key words, like the word "elements" Peter uses. 2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief; in the which the heavens shall pass away...
Top