It takes more effort to commit to an answer in the true/false binary, and give rational or factual reasons for that answer, than it does to say whether you agree or disagree and how strongly you feel that way. However, it's much easier to argue against feelings-based reasoning than rational...
So when in election season, do as the Vulcans do? It would be nice if it was that easy, but different people feel different ways about different candidates. It's inevitable and can't be helped. I would agree that, in general, logic > feelings, but it's in people's nature to vote how they feel.
'Turtles all the way down' refers to a story in which someone rejects science and holds to their belief that the world rests on the back of a turtle. When asked what the turtle stands on, they reply a larger turtle. When asked what the bottom turtle stands on, they say it's turtles all the way...
I'm answering a question in the OP by saying it's false by default, thereby rendering the other questions moot. I then say it could be proven otherwise just as a CYA policy. Until such time, it is definitely false.