• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Q

    Behe's new paper

    Mr Spinkles, It's impossible to demonstrate what Darwinian processes 'cannot' do, so it's not surprising that Behe doesn't demonstrate what Darwinian processes 'cannot' do. :) Darwinian processes don't merely have to be capable of producing the FCTs, they have to be capable of...
  2. Q

    Behe's new paper

    Mr. Sprinkles, You've made a lot of great points in this thread and I've just gotten to turning my forum brain back on the past few days after a nice break playing video games. I really enjoyed reading your post and I will really enjoy replying to it, if God permits, within a week...
  3. Q

    What & Where is the "Truth" ?

    IT, Do you find success convincing people who know the Bible? I find your views interesting but impossible to accept because they don't agree with the Bible. It's definitely a gentler belief system than Islam, I'll give you that. Looking forward, QM
  4. Q

    Behe's new paper

    Outhouse, I wasn't aware that's what I was doing. I'll take that into consideration. Thank you, QM
  5. Q

    Behe's new paper

    Auto, I get the sense that we're not going to agree and with your closing remark I can't help but think the time spent on exchanges might be better spent reading. My opinions on capitalism are being changed as I write. I find this very interesting: Darwin and Darwinism: The (Alleged) Social...
  6. Q

    Behe's new paper

    Nepenthe, Consensus is the lowest level of evidence. :) Lots of people disagreed with Darwin. Lots of people disagreed with Gould. Lots of people disagree with Behe! Plus, I think you're not giving Behe a fair shake when you say he doesn't state what is a case of something not designed. He does...
  7. Q

    Behe's new paper

    Auto, I've read Edge of Evolution (which goes into detail exploring what Darwinian processes can't do, trying to find the 'edge') and I've read this paper. There must be some difference between what we've read because I think this paper is talking about the edge of evolution. He's on a...
  8. Q

    What & Where is the "Truth" ?

    IT, Well, this is all news to me :) Do you believe in hell? How about predestination? Looking forward, QM
  9. Q

    Behe's new paper

    Hello all, I guess we can safely say that those who disagree with Behe's Intelligent Design also think that the paper he wrote is ambiguous and poor in quality? I'm glad we also agree that the peer review process has a place, but also has limitations(like Darwinian Evolution?)...
  10. Q

    Behe's new paper

    PW, What did you think of the content of the paper? Do you think it will be shredded? Looking forward, QM
  11. Q

    What & Where is the "Truth" ?

    IT, The events in revelation (the breaking of the seal) include every creature in heaven and on earth and under the earth and on the sea and all that is in them singing praises to the Lamb. (Rev 5:13) The Lamb goes on to open the seals of judgement including a judgment with a massive...
  12. Q

    Do you get smart when you die?

    James, I think your post was thorough and generally very good at demonstrating your point, I admire your patience. soli deo gloria Yours in Christ, QM
  13. Q

    Behe's new paper

    Hello all, I'm kind of surprised that no one has recognized that a review of what evolution is capable of sets the backdrop for saying what it is not capable of. Since Intelligent Design is often seen as an inference to the best explanation (and a Designer is seen as being a better inference...
  14. Q

    What & Where is the "Truth" ?

    PA, Is any book ever more than a collection of ideas? Looking forward, QM
  15. Q

    What & Where is the "Truth" ?

    IT, You are using the word mystery differently than the Apostles did. To them the mystery was there, it was hidden in plain sight. It wasn't sealed up, but was going into all the world but only those God desired would receive the message. When you refer to Revelation surely you must...
  16. Q

    Death of Jesus

    JM, Do you think your credibility suffers when you make sweeping statements about a belief system whose book(not very long, might I add) you haven't taken the pains to read? Next time I'll remember that we're talking about various critics interpretation of the Bible instead of...
  17. Q

    What & Where is the "Truth" ?

    IT, What do you mean the book itself says it's sealed? Looking forward, QM
  18. Q

    Behe's new paper

    Does Behe publishing in QRB mean the peer review process has failed, or that Behe is a legitimate scientist doing legitimate science?
  19. Q

    Death of Jesus

    JM, Again I think it would be wise to reserve such critical words until you've actually read the book, wouldn't you? As for Jesus, he doesn't have to have 'the correct interpretation' to have a valid interpretation and see it fulfilled in his own life giving him a reason to believe he is...
  20. Q

    Death of Jesus

    JM, I forgot, the demonstration that God's greatness did not depend on our desire or effort was to show that only God deserves the glory (the honor, the praise). He created the world for His pleasure, and what pleases Him most is getting all the credit. Looking forward, QM
Top