Science most certainly CAN investigate the ice cream preferences on the population, and the various reasons why individuals might decide that one particular flavor is the best. But none of that will ever determine what is the BEST flavor, since that is purely a subjective opinion. In this case...
I don't think that I've ever heard anyone claim that the scientific method can determine the the answer to ALL questions. For instance, no one that I'm aware of claims that this method can determine what ice cream the 'best' flavor. It's a purely subjective questions and is not the something...
Now come on... you can only speak for yourself as a gay man. Just because you associate with beautiful women and hate other men and ugly women doesn't mean that's the case for all gay men, or for any other gay man for that matter.
1. God is not weak because He chooses to use Messengers to communicate. God uses them because the all-knowing God knows that Messengers are the *best way* to communicate to humans.
-- This is a claim but it is not based upon flawed logic.
Sure it's based on flawed logic. Stating that god is...
Look, the question about 10 dollars in my pocket. Are there ten dollars now in my pocket? The possible answers are just two:
Yes. No.
Are there $10 in your pocket? The possible answers are Yes, I believe you DO have $10 in your pocket. No, I do NOT believe that you have $10 in your pocket, or...
Nope... #1 is a claim based on flawed logic which employs the fallacy of circular reasoning. #2 is NOT based on verifiable fact, since you've yet to provide ANY verifiable evidence that this proposed god being sent any messengers whatsoever.
Yet another claim for which you've provided no evidence. In fact, based upon much of what you've posted you've been providing evidence for the exact opposite.
No religious claims can be verified.
Messengers cannot be *verified* to have spoken for God because because God cannot be verified to exist.
Which is precisely why I lack any belief in any god or gods. Things that cannot be verified to be real do not warrant my belief.
1. God is not weak...
Claims that can't be verified are about the weakest evidence someone can provide. Thus if there are genuinely 'messengers from god' then I can only conclude that this god is extremely weak and ineffectual and probably not worthy of my attention.
I have read what followers of Baha'u'llah claim are his most compelling writings and have not found them to be any more convincing than any other claims made by other professed messengers from god. Was he a liar, crazy, or deluded? I don't know. He could have been all or none of the above...
Unverifiable claims just barely qualifies as bad evidence and doesn't come even close to providing anything akin to proof. Yes, I have read many if not most of the unverifiable claims and they remain just that, claims that cannot be verified.
Yes, important information that should be included in ANY official police report... yet for some reason the report she paid for and received didn't include it.
That is all the defendant will give as proof of God.
Then the defendant has given ZERO proof, since all the defendant has provided are unverifiable claims. Defendant has failed to prove its claim, thus the case is dismissed.
That means if there is serious injury to the WOMAN who was pregnant. SHE is considered a human being, but the fetus is NOT. The man who caused the premature birth isn't considered a murderer, because he didn't kill a human being. All he did was to kill a potential human being that the...