Also.. mathematically for like an "E=mc2" equation we could say a few different things maybe...
(f)|0|= [0=0║0≠0]
or...
|0| = ±∞
We could illustrate it maybe as something like this image below... but this is just my interpretation, I don't know formally what would make the most sense, I'm...
I guess I misunderstand the point though sorry lol.
I think we are discussing what it means if I describe the impossibility of duplication, and that to interpret that concept more accurately we need to understand that replication is the only thing that can occur.
That there's a subtle...
I'm not following.
If you make a scale model, its still not the original, they are different things. But each and every thing is of infinite information, yes, as there are infinite relationships to be subject to.
I'm trying to spread this reasoning, it seems legit and a potential sign of humanity awakening a bit more. But I also have to play video games and go to bed.
The point of that statement is to describe a boundary of reality. Exact duplication of information is fiction. Every single perspective is of it's own perspective.
I tried to express illegitimacy of duplication existing. It doesn't exist. It's a linguistic misinterpretation. Only replication...
continuing... (also there's a lot I'm thinking but not writing cause it's just too much text, so I'm sorry if I skip thoughts or my if words/sentences don't align well)
We could continue to analyze any observation and correlate the same expression at the centers of each and every thing, or at...
...continuing.
We briefly glanced at aspects of life transforming, and how we can measure space.
What about configurations of space? In the same manner of relationships forming new information, spatial occupancy is grown into. Observing the golden ratio or fractals can speak a lot to this...
Well, to appreciate this notion (before we get to the juice of origins and objectivity) it might be beneficial to glance at the scope of its implications. (this might get wordy, I'm sorry)
Forget about asymmetry for a bit. I theorize that there's a fundamental aspect of reality. Before I am...
"Stuff" is not specific enough for me to understand the origin of existence and why or what we are, objectively. I hear "stuff" and I think of the 80's horror movie "The Stuff".
Also the question is "what is most fundamental about existence?", I'm not referring to life specifically.
However...
Ah...Alright let me try to walk through it step by step.
Relationship = the way in which two or more concepts are connected, or the state of being connected. (everything is connected at least through the fact that everything shares existence in some fashion)
Information = a variable or set of...
Isn't that cool? haha. I didn't tell you guys what to say, and I went first, but we all said the same thing even though we used different words and thoughts. At the core the meaning is the same.
There's details sprinkled and layered on top of these fundamental asymmetry's that define uniqueness...
I've started a thread on what does and doesn't have value for me. I entitled it, "What is Fundamental?"
If you're really interested in what I think has value.
https://www.religiousforums.com/threads/what-is-the-most-fundamental.175015/
Is there a more appropriate area in the forum to discuss this? Or maybe this isn't the right forum? I would think people would be interested in understanding reality, especially Non-Theists who reject fantasy as real. Why else would there be a Non-Theist section? LOL
I'm sorry, but I challenge that statement and claim that it is answerable.
"The question" has meaning just as the words in it do. And as for the answer, I've already stated what I think it is, and I'm trying to walk us through understanding, but it requires thinking about the definitions of the...
Oh. :(
I asked what is the most fundamental thing.
People responded with various words in attempt to answer.
I attempted to explain how the meaning and definition of the words chosen all share a common theme that is fundamental to the meaning of the words. And that this common core is also...
I'm sorry, I understand. You can look up the meaning of my used words with a dictionary website if you're interested. I know it's a thick usage of deep concepts not easily entertained though. Maybe some others posts and more input from others will help make it clearer in the future.
Because it wouldn't mean much if we didn't walk there together. And I already did state what I think is most fundamental in the first post of the thread.
Now I'd like to see if people can understand how whatever they thought was most fundamental is actually the same thing as what I first...