All renderings are 100% verifiable for those willing to do so.
Renderings such as Arberry cannot be verified as he left no exegesis behind to follow...as you have found out.
There are legions of verses in the Koran which proclaim Jesus' divinity.
Here is an example...
قل إن كان للرحمن ولد فأنا أول...
You keep busting yourself, brother.
We asked point-blank for you to give Arberry's reasoning for his rendering of the term...and look at you....running off and doing everything other than providing Arberry's reasoning.
You can't even define the very term you are arguing.
What a hoot!
Since you are taking over for your brother, then please tell us who is sitting on the Throne in this verse.
Your brother kept ignoring this time and again...
και ειδον θρονον μεγαν...
Lets see exactly how much you know.
Please tell us what word this is and why Arberry rendered it as he did
وقفينا على ءاثرهم بعيسى ابن...
According to Greek grammar, Jesus is God.
Even your brother comprehended this....that is why he left you on your own...as you are not quite bright enough to understand this fact.
What's the matter brother...can't think of any material on your own?
The point is you rely on others' renderings in lieu of your own because you don't know any Arabic at all.
Therefore you must constantly be defending someone else's work....of which, you cannot support.
None of your renderings show their work.
We have already been over this numerous times...
The bottom line is that Jesus is God.
Wrong.
Not only does it apply, but it dismisses you and your brother's argument altogether.
Hmmm....now that you are both cognizant that Jesus is God, what syntax issues could possibly matter?
What part are you having trouble with?
Owning an English Koran must be pretty important to you...yes?
Now...how about discussing the Arabic behind your special English renderings...?
Not that you ever have...but, you never know...
Another meritless assertion without a shred of evidence.
Still pandering to that fantom wiki...
Not a single, solitary word of our assigning the G-S rule to anything in your links, brother
Keep looking for for the link...
Now we are getting somewhere....and yes, the G-S rule does indeed apply to Rev 5.12....of which, is even called-out directly by Granville in his book.
However, you...
We have already been over this brother.
You keep repeating your same mistakes, over and over...
It looks like you are wanting to slavishly google your responses again, and then run away from defending the Arabic behind the rendering.
Just like you have always done...
What Arabic word...
Nope.
What verse?
Nope.
We never once stated the G-S rule....as anyone familar with it already knows its implications.
Furthermore, Titus 2.13 & 2 Peter 1.1 completely and utterly affirm that Jesus is God.
There is absolutely no doubt.
You don't even even know to what Biblical...
You ain't no 'Christian'...and you ain't no 'scholar'.....willie...
Just another guy with a chip on his shoulder.
Now...run along and let brother DP help you out with scripture.