Can, nowadays, quality communication span our religious beliefs? When we establish a rapport with another person/persons, will such a bonding traverse religious differences? Or does our concept of "God" interfere with such meaningful communication? What are your thoughts?
Yes, I agree we need inquiry and Self inquiry but how much do we need argumentative skepticism in this already prevailing complexity and fragmentation out there and for sure in ourselves? and i think this is the time when we can leave religious books and intellectual knowledge aside and maybe...
what are supposed things - what are actual things? Where is the line of demarcation in our own life or elsewere between these apparent two different things ? How far should we take a skeptic attitude? What is this 'reality' as a foundation?
a) wow, wow are all communications intellectual by their very nature?!
"I fully agree about the convenience of community-oriented communications, however. Have you heard of "silent transmission"?"
b) I know there are all sorts of " silent transmissions" . How do you define or what does...
a) Yes I agree but aren't there all sorts of rational systems?
b) of course there is a reason for everything even when we don't know this, but don't we try to rationalize almost anything?
c) as far as i understand, they don't advocate this as a constant sort of lifestyle. They use it only...
Yes, I also get out something from this website. They seem to be genuine.
I see the Ahmahaa as a heart-to-heart communication approach, not induced mainly by our intellect. They speak about community as a vital factor.
They say we are over stimulated by our own intellect, our fragmented mind...