• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. T

    Theory versus Law

    You were incorrect due to a lack of scientific literacy.
  2. T

    Scientology

    Inb4b&
  3. T

    who is lord xenu?

    Most FreeZoners will have no problem discussion their beliefs with you. In fact you can download the entirety of the ‘Clearbird’ doctrines here. But to answer your question with respect to Scientology proper – there is absolutely no reason whatsoever you should consider joining any group...
  4. T

    The ToE and common ancestry of all life forms did not come from looking at the evidence

    fify.
  5. T

    The Koran is the Word of God? How do we know this?

    I could be wrong here, but I tend to use the word 'scientist' to refer to people who have made positive contributions to the field of science and have helped expand our scientific understanding of the world around us. All I see Naik doing is talking crap and being a laughing stock.
  6. T

    To any Atheists, I Have a Few Scenarios for you to Look At.

    Your continued refusal to admit that find the satan defense unjustified amuses me.
  7. T

    To any Atheists, I Have a Few Scenarios for you to Look At.

    I just have to say how freaking funny it is to watch DS appeal to majority law in order to avoid confessing his agreement with the unjustifiably of the satan defence. You dug yourself into that hole and it has been very entertaining watching you do so.
  8. T

    Atheists/Skeptics: Don't want to believe?

    How cool would astral projection be?
  9. T

    Think like Darwin. Are God and His works perfect?

    This makes no sense and I suspect you already know this. The phrase is "survival of the fittest." In that context 'fittest' means exactly that - those creatures which are 'fitter' than their competition. Care to respond without defacing the theory?
  10. T

    Let's Present Some Evidence ...

    Would hallucination (perception in the absence of a stimulus) fit better?
  11. T

    Think like Darwin. Are God and His works perfect?

    If you use perfect in the sense of optimal state then the whole argument seems moot. To me I do not see how you could justify the claim that any creature has reached an optimum. Evolution can only reach an optimum if the factors of environmental attrition remain fixed for a sufficiently long...
  12. T

    Think like Darwin. Are God and His works perfect?

    Thinking like Darwin I suspect you put the cart before the horse. The environment isn’t perfect to us, WE are perfect for the environment. You need to understand the inversion of reasoning that Darwin discovered here. I can’t really comment much on your ideas due to the word ‘perfect’...
  13. T

    To any Atheists, I Have a Few Scenarios for you to Look At.

    I too want to see how this is a strawman. Particularly given that you seemed unwilling to confront such analogies in previous treads. I can imagine OJ’s lawyer in court during his next case telling the jury that since they cannot disprove aliens involvement with the evidence they must...
  14. T

    The dishonesty of creationists.

    So when you claimed not to be able to open a banana the way chimps can you were being disgustingly dishonest by not mentioning this? I don’t feel any guilt when I say this, but for you to parade your own disability as a means of scoring points in a debate, particularly when that disability is...
  15. T

    The ToE and common ancestry of all life forms did not come from looking at the evidence

    It is exactly this type of vacuous thinking and rationalisation that make creationism so cancerous to science.
  16. T

    The ToE and common ancestry of all life forms did not come from looking at the evidence

    Isn’t electronics underpinned by semi-conductor theory which is in turn underpinned by atomic theory? This would be the same atomic theory you spit on when you try to challenge radiometric dating.
  17. T

    Global warming not caused by greenhouse gasses

    Given that Mann did not, in any way shape or form, attempt to quantify the role of natural forcing with his paper, and was solely concerned with generating an historical record for comparison, shows that you have a gross misunderstanding of both his paper and the relevancy of that paper to the...
  18. T

    The dishonesty of creationists.

    I’m able to open bananas the chimp way without any paste. Ever since I seen it done I’ve copied the method due to not having the stringy problem. So you pretty much fail here. WE designed the banana. Humans designed the banana through centuries of domestication. When you ignore this...
  19. T

    Global warming not caused by greenhouse gasses

    1) You are still misrepresenting Mann’s work and its role in the AGW debate. I’ve called you out for this on numerous occasions. Please review my posts where I discussed this in depth. In particular you are ignoring the lack of natural forcing mechanisms that have been demonstrated for current...
  20. T

    The dishonesty of creationists.

    See that computer you are using? It was made using this thing called semiconductor theory which is in turn based on atomic theory. In the other thread you have someone trying to deny radiometric dating, and thus atomic theory, for entirely religious reasons. In short, such people are...
Top