The author of the post fail to distinguish between the historical first century Ribi Yehoshua and the le-havdil (to differentiate) Christian Jzus .
Le-havdil, A logical analysis (found in the website netzarim.co.il (Netzarim.co.il is the website of the only legitimate Netzarim-group)) of all...
"Historical J...."?!?
Using that contra-historical oxymoron (demonstrated by the eminent late Oxford historian, James Parkes, The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue) exposes dependancy upon 4th-century, gentile, Hellenist sources.
While scholars debate the provenance of the original...
Hello,
So you love the Jews? Why do you wan't them to stop practise non-selective Torah-observance then??
No one can follow two polar-opposite masters the authentic, historical, PRO-Torah 1st-century Ribi from Nazareth and the 4th-century (post-135 C.E.), arch-antithesis ANTI-Torah apostasy...
Fish-Hunter:
From square one it must be recognized that any possibility of kipeir [To Wipe on (a Torah [Instruction the Jewish Bible]-defined transgression-blotting agent) or Wipe off (a Torah-defined transgression] is explicitly denied to the individual who presumptuously transgresses...
Fish-Hunter,
Your view have no support in the Bible.
The contrast between the Torâh formula for kipur [atonement] and, le-havdil [to separate] , the Hellenist-Christian "plan of salvation" exemplifies the intractable antithesis of these mutually exclusive belief systems:
1. For...
Dunemeister,
I notice that you rely on NT in the rows that you write.
The most authoritative Christian scholars, e.g., The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, acknowledge that many readings in NT were created for theological or dogmatic reasons. The logical conclusion is that NT is NOT a...
This post we about the historical Jesus . who was he? Did he or his followers create a new religion?
According to historical scholarship [sources: see at the bottom of this post] he practised what corresponds to todays Orthodox Judaism all his life. His followers were called Netzarim that is...