Elohim isn't all encompassing. The usual desciption of YHWH and his people is qodesh (translated as "holy"), which means set-apart. The universal aspect of Christian religion originated with the globalist ambition of the proud man:
Yea also, because he transgresseth by wine, [he is] a proud...
because the context of Habakkuk2:5 is of faith, which relates to the growth of the Christian faith pre Constantine.
Behold, his soul [which] is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.
Habakkuk 2:4
Paul misquotes this verse in his epistle to the Romans:
For...
It grew because of the proud man.
Yea also, because he transgresseth by wine, [he is] a proud man, neither keepeth at home, who enlargeth his desire as hell, and [is] as death, and cannot be satisfied, but gathereth unto him all nations, and heapeth unto him all people:
Habakkuk2:5
Paul's doctrine of salvation is based on hubris. It's one of the things which identifies him in prophecy.
Yea also, because he transgresseth by wine, [he is] a proud man, neither keepeth at home, who enlargeth his desire as hell, and [is] as death, and cannot be satisfied, but gathereth unto...
Collectivism is part of the problem, but it still comes back to Christianity.
Yea also, because he transgresseth by wine, [he is] a proud man, neither keepeth at home, who enlargeth his desire as hell, and [is] as death, and cannot be satisfied, but gathereth unto him all nations, and heapeth...
And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed [it], and brake [it], and gave [it] to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body.
And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave [it] to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;
For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for...
The proud man of Habakkuk 2:3 belongs to the time of the end, because he's part of the vision.
The "time of the end" (Daniel) relates to "at the end" (Habakkuk).
Many that "run to and fro" (Daniel) relates to "he may run" (Habakkuk).
But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book...
I still think the proud man in Habakkuk refers to the babylonian invaders, because that info comes from previous chapters of the short book. James is free to oppose Abraham's views as long as James does not contradict the law. To say it connects the proud man seems tenuous or perhaps...
Paul vs David
As well as James' opposing view of Abraham's belief[אמן] of Genesis 15:6, which connects the vain man of James 2:20 with the proud man of Habakkuk2:5, there's a problem with Paul using David to support his argument that all men are liars. The parable of 2 Samuel 12 describes...
All men, all angels, good or evil, all creation in Heaven and earth, and Godhead - Father, Son and Holy Ghost/Spirit are in the Bible.
So, yes, you, I and Trump are in the Bible, but Trump is not a fulfillment of Revelation 6:4.
Rev 6:4 And there went out another horse that was red: and power...
In the ot- Hebrew--Sheol- where you have hell listed--Sheol = the common grave. ]
Ashes to Ashes, dust to dust.
The first resurrection has occurred-- there will be a resurrection to earth--post Har-mageddon as well.
Just to be clear about hell:.
Here's its etymology
"In Middle English, also of the Limbus Patrum, place where the Patriarchs, Prophets, etc. awaited the Atonement. Used in the KJV for Old Testament Hebrew Sheol and New Testament Greek Hades, Gehenna. Used figuratively for "state of misery, any...
LOL! You can post Greek all you want - and the GREEK HADES - won't magically become the LATER INCORRECT - ENGLISH - TRANSLATION of HELL - meaning a Fiery HELL where people are tortured in Judgment for sins."
*
The next three in your list just for you. LOL!
example 15)
Amos 9:2...
Round and round you go proving nothing.
I noted - AGAIN - at the top - Number 13 - HEBREW text - which you are insisting is "HELL"
And you are AGAIN wrongly using GREEK to come up with this.
The Hebrew word is SHEOL - GRAVE - holding place until Judgment.
Here are some correct...
Post two of two
Ingledsva’s reply was (#1460) :
“LOL! Dude, as usual you are making stupid statements about me. I am well aware of ALL the words in Tanakh and NT erroneously translated as the Christian Fiery "Hell," which they are not. And the ridiculousness of trying to...
post two of two
example 13)
Isaiah 57:9 And thou wentest to the king with ointment, and didst increase thy perfumes, and didst send thy messengers far off, and didst debase thyself even unto hell.
The Greek LXX reads : και...
Pure BULL!
There is no "hell" in Tanakh.
And the others have different words meaning grave, in most cases, or are being misread, or are translating the Hebrew.
We have discussed these many times.
And no Lucifer fallen from heaven either.
*
Simple question for you...
Ingledsva asks : “Does Jesus actually teach about "Hell?"
Disciple replied: “yes, He does.”
Ingledsva responded : “Actually I don't believe Jesus does. Tanakh definitely does not have Hell.
Disciple replied : “Nope, He does, I'll find the verse(s)”...