Still with the proof thing? Scientists don't require or care about proof, which is seldom possible.
Good to see you've realized scientists have faith, too. It's to bad they put their faith in each other's guessing games.
Scientists are the problem, not science itself. How one interprets evidence has everything to do with their own personal bias and preferences.
Scientists cannot prove abiogenesis, big bang theory, macro-evolution or any of the many, many assumptions used in the "truth" of such theories that...
I have looked into it. Abiogenesis is just about as stupid a theory as spontaneous generation was. Even if scientists managed to create some resemblance of a life form in a lab it would not prove abiogenesis. But why prove it when they can get intelligent people to believe it, anyway?
That's a fact, not just a scientific denial.
Scientists are busy now trying to determine exactly how that happened a few billion years ago.
Scientists need to get busy on feeding everybody, curing cancer, AIDS and researching things that really matter.