On the contrary - I don't take offense so easily. Only people with an ego intact take offense and/or project others as having one that upsets their own.
I understand Islam on a more "rudimentary" level than most Muslims do: they don't 'know' their own history, because their own leaders lie to them about it.
Early Muslims post-Muhammad used to face and pray toward Petra. Hardly a single Muslim knows this today. They are indoctrinated as having...
Don't be so sure: there is a lot of information available about it.
This guy wrote a book (which I have):
and there is Freud:
Moses and Monotheism - Wikipedia
Had Freud had access to the archeological reliefs we have now he might well have likewise deduced that rather than Moses having...
It doesn't matter what Muslims "believe" - "belief" is not a virtue. The story itself indicates that Adam blames Eve for his own eating. The point is they hypocritically call Moses a prophet (he didn't even write the Torah) yet do not read/understand it. Man blaming woman for his own iniquity is...
Muhammad is not a prophet of any god - the Qur'an is forged from Christian strophic hymns and apocryphal texts. By virtue of this, as stated, the shahada is necessarily a false testimony contrary to the ten commandments.
Not a single Muslim alive today was there... but they still bear testimony...
It's not a belief - "belief" is not a virtue - it is the problem.
No - it is ignorant. Some "beliefs" should *not* be respected, especially when they:
i. are not true, and
ii. dictate how to treat/regard others (ie. "unbelievers"). This begs for fascism and is a source of it.
Tolerance is a...
"BELIEF" is not a virtue - I don't "believe" things.
This said I know the Qur'an is forged and did not come from a god. I've researched the origins of the Qur'an and traced it back to its original sources, which I have read and cross-referenced with the Qur'an, and found it to be certain that...
What point are you trying to make?
The problem is Islam indoctrinating Muslims to "BELIEVE" something that is not true. As such, Muslims naturally require scapegoating in order to justify its own 'state' despite not actually addressing it: the state of Islam itself. This is why I stated that...
If we take 'I AM' as the root of all consciousness, and strip it completely of any/all possible accessory identifications, what is one left with but the name the Abrahamic god equips Moses with upon his descent into Egypt? Importantly, though this god identified itself roughly as "I am that I...
Lol what nonsense is this.
The reason Islam is so dangerous is simple: Muslims "BELIEVE" the Qur'an is the perfect, inimitable, unaltered, inerrant word of god when it is not. It is forged from Christian strophic hymns and apocryphal texts. That Muslims "BELIEVE" a god had anything to do with...
Herein contains an argument which attempts to resolve the Abrahamic Edenic conflict(s).
___________________________THE '(AS) GOD' ARGUMENT__________________________
If (i):
satan necessarily requires "BELIEF" in order for "BELIEVERS" to "BELIEVE" satan is GOD (in the first place)
(ie. good is...
I feel we have the same <object> in mind using different expressions as well, however I still defend there is no such thing as a "justified belief". For example, if it is "believed" that whatever solution is required for world peace would necessarily involve eradication of Jews (ie. mindset of...
There is no such thing as a "justified" belief. If something is "justified", it has a basis which elevates beyond a simple "BELIEF". A "belief" does not require a justified basis to be a "belief".
lol
This is not owing to "belief" - in fact the opposite: science. Science requires testing...
This is not a "belief" - if something is supported by actual evidence, that is minimally a hypothesis, not a "belief". A "belief" does not require evidence - a hypothesis does.
An example of a "belief" is: we are in possession of the perfect word of God. This "belief" is shared by billions of...
Grants: The Torah (ie. first five books of Moses) *could* have come from God, but argues not in favor neither against.
Addresses: Abrahamic Faiths (ie. god of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob etc.)
*Assumption: God exists (ie. for the purposes of argumentation only).
**Presumption #1: God "knows" good and...
The synthesis is:
If satan, in order to have power/control
requires that "believers" "believe" satan is god,
(when in fact satan is not)
then "belief" is necessarily not a virtue
because "knowing" 'good and evil'
informs one of what NOT to "believe"
ever-reducing satan into irreducible...
_____________________________
אלהים ARGUMENT: YOU ARE GODS.
IF: A BEING(S) "BELIEVES" THEY ARE NOT AS GOD(S),
THEN: THEY WILL NOT BE AS GOD(S)
ELSE ONLY: "BELIEVING"to "KNOW" GOOD AND EVIL.
IF: A BEING "KNOWS" THEY ARE GOD(S),
THEN: THEY WILL BE AS GOD(S)
"KNOWING" GOOD AND EVIL...
hello e'ry1,
ok so i am argue:
SINCE SATAN REQUIRES "BELIEF" TO EXIST (IE. RULE)
(by virtue of "BELIEVERS" "BELIEVING" satan to be god)
IT FOLLOWS "KNOWLEDGE" (in/of (knowing) 'good and evil') IS A VIRTUE,
(by virtue of knowing what and/or what NOT to "BELIEVE")
AND BECAUSE "BELIEF" (in/of...
"Belief" is not the next-best thing to "knowing".
Just a simple question would be better than a "belief" - and the being focuses on this one question until it is answered within themselves such that they "know".
For example rather than trying know what god *is*, eliminating everything god is...
That is a gooooood question.
No - "belief" is not required to love someone. I would say true love would be the opposite: not that you "believe" in a person, but you know them, and love them for who they are.
However, a person *can* "love" someone based on who they "believe" that person is. For...