Hi, looks like the powers that be limit my response to 420 characters so I will have to break my response into a few blocks. I think 512 characters would make more sense ha ha.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Religious Forums
JoshuaTree
JoshuaTree
I don't dispute that observation or observations involving the merger of black holes, the point I've been trying to make (apparently very poorly ha ha) is if you pluck a star or whatever from the universe then the gravitational effects of the missing star could be measured across the entire universe at the same time hence instantaneous gravity.
JoshuaTree
Of course plucking a star from the universe violates conservation of energy... As do stars falling beyond the particle horizon given finite gravity... And as maybe the mass of a star on formation of a black hole.
JoshuaTree
I am math guy who has written software most of my life not an astrophysicist so I fully understand you are much more qualified to comment on this than I am... But there seems to be some issue with finite gravity and observations like the particle horizon.
JoshuaTree
Entanglement is instantaneous as I understand it, I'm not sure how to express it but seems like a similar connection for gravity that maybe we don't fully understand yet.