• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

viole
Reaction score
5,210

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Thanx for the fosilized frubal !
    And for froobing the Flying Ravioli Monster.
    And for the Arts & Entertainment network frubwork.
    And for fruballing my minor fix of that really bizarre post.
    And for flurbing religious invocations in trying times.
    Ah the good ld days of Godel the meek king of the metaphysical whoopping up the LPers of the day! COME BACK GODEL WE NEED YOU! lol oops I posted thes in reverse order please read the last as 1st? thanz
    I must hold to what is called, and wrongly so, 'The copenhengan interpertation' as being the most likley to be true. The reason I say 'copenhangen interp' is not an accurate moniker is because its really just a set of ideas developed , Bohr, Heisenberg, (Wolfgang) Pauli, and several others in the late 1920s and maybe the early thirties.
    No really math was one of my worst and most difficult subjects (English grammar too). When I began writing in these forums and teaching middle school kids as a summer sub I had to take remedial math courses.....Ugh!One last thing, due to your accomplishments there is no need to source your claims! That said I still can not agree with your version of QT.
    Hi Viole. I finished replying to your post and checked your profile because you seemed well so versed in QT. NO WONDER you were baiting me! Lol. Occupation: Applied Math......Oh yeah, pick on the little guys!
    ..............end .............
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top