Yerda
Veteran Member
If this topic has been broached and dealt with already I apologise, it has been niggling at me for a little while.
For those who believe that evolution as a shift in genotypic and phenotypic ratios across populations leading to moderate adaptations and other micro-evolutions can occur, but have difficulty in accepting speciation etc (or macro-evolution if you like).
Do you consider irrelevant the biochemical similarities, and most importantly comparable DNA sequences, between differing species?
My point is that evolutionary leaps don't appear quite as large when considering the small contrast in DNA required.
For those who believe that evolution as a shift in genotypic and phenotypic ratios across populations leading to moderate adaptations and other micro-evolutions can occur, but have difficulty in accepting speciation etc (or macro-evolution if you like).
Do you consider irrelevant the biochemical similarities, and most importantly comparable DNA sequences, between differing species?
My point is that evolutionary leaps don't appear quite as large when considering the small contrast in DNA required.